1 / 12

Task 2.3 Thermal-hydraulic analysis of the LFR and ETDR

Task 2.3 Thermal-hydraulic analysis of the LFR and ETDR. Konstantin Mikityuk Paul Scherrer Institut. Task 2.3 Thermal-hydraulic analysis of the LFR and ETDR ( PSI , CIRTEN, NRG, SRS,UJV).

gallia
Download Presentation

Task 2.3 Thermal-hydraulic analysis of the LFR and ETDR

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Task 2.3 Thermal-hydraulic analysis of the LFR and ETDR Konstantin MikityukPaul Scherrer Institut

  2. Task 2.3 Thermal-hydraulic analysis of the LFR and ETDR (PSI, CIRTEN, NRG, SRS,UJV) Goal: to assess thermal-hydraulic core performance for the defined core geometry and power distributions provided by task 2.1 and 2.2. The results will be feed-backed to the mentioned task in order to avoid hot spots in the core (cladding and fuel) and to allow a satisfying natural circulation in case of loss of flow. Technical Documents T56 : Thermal-hydraulics assessment of the ETDR core (M24: April 2012) T62 : Thermal-hydraulics assessment of the LFR cores (M30: Oct 2012)

  3. T56: Table of Content 1 INTRODUCTION (PSI) 3 2 1D THERMAL-HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS OF THE CORE (PSI) 6 2.1 1D CORE MODEL 6 2.2 POWER DISTRIBUTION AND COOLING GROUPS 6 3 CFD ASSESSMENT OF GRID SPACER DESIGNS (NRG) 10 3.1 EFIT SPACER DESIGN 10 3.2 SRS SPACER DESIGN 17 3.3 COMPARISON: EFIT SPACER VS. SRS SPACER 23 3.4 CONCLUSIONS TO SECTION 3 24 4 CFD ASSESSMENT OF PRESSURE DROPS AT FA INLET AND OUTLET (SRS) 25 4.1 ALFRED FA PROPOSAL 25 4.2 PRESSURE DROP EVALUATION 27 4.3 CONCLUSIONS TO SECTION 4. 36 5 CFD ASSESSMENT OF PRESSURE DROPS ALONG BARE FUEL BUNDLE (UJV) 38 6 CFD ASSESSMENT OF ALFRED FA: A ONE-TWELFTH MODEL (POLIMI) 39 6.1 INTRODUCTION 39 6.2 ALFRED FUEL ASSEMBLY MODEL 39 6.3 SIMULATION RESULTS 42 6.4 CONCLUSIONS TO SECTION 6 59 7 CONCLUSIONS (PSI) 60 8 REFERENCES 61

  4. TRACE/FRED model of the ALFRED core • 171 parallel 1D channels and 171 heat structures representing one fuel rod per SA • 3 channels for bypasses -- between FAs; -- through reflector; and -- through CAs • BC on inlet coolant temperature (400C) and flowrate (25458 kg/s)

  5. Power distribution in fuel assemblies and non-fuel regions, MW

  6. Power distribution (D7) • SA-wise power distribution over core radius (CEA)

  7. Power distribution (D7, Figs. 7-11) • SA-wise power distribution and proposal for cooling groups (CEA) CG1 CG2 CG3 CG4

  8. Cooling groups • Proposal for cooling groupsCG1 : 1 – 87CG2 : 88 – 111CG3 : 113 –117 120 – 125 127 – 132 134 – 139 141 – 146 148 – 153CG4 : 112, 119, 126, 133, 140, 147 154 – 171CG 5: 172CG 6: 173CG7: 174

  9. Outlet coolant temperatures • TRACE results : 474 – 491 C. The maximum difference is ~17 C

  10. Flowrate

  11. Coolant flowrate distribution in the core, kg/s

  12. T62: LFR core thermal hydraulics What is expected? 1D TH analysis of the core?

More Related