1 / 54

Florida Department of Education’s Teacher Evaluation System

Florida Department of Education’s Teacher Evaluation System. Student Learning Growth. Established by Student Success Act (SB 736) Teacher Evaluation System. Evaluation Criteria for All Instructional Personnel and School Administrators Professional Practice Student Learning Growth

galvin-lester
Download Presentation

Florida Department of Education’s Teacher Evaluation System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Florida Department of Education’s Teacher Evaluation System Student Learning Growth

  2. Established by Student Success Act (SB 736) Teacher Evaluation System • Evaluation Criteria for All Instructional Personnel and School Administrators • Professional Practice • Student Learning Growth • JTEC & Principal Evaluation Committee

  3. Established by Student Success Act (SB 736)Teacher Evaluation System Apply Weights IP = 60% SLG = 40% Final Rating HE Eff NI U Student Learning Growth (SLG) (4)Highly Effective (3) Effective (2) Needs Improvement (1) Unsatisfactory Instructional Practice (IP) (4)Highly Effective (3) Effective (2) Needs Improvement (1) Unsatisfactory

  4. VAM & Student Learning Growth • Contribution to a change in a student’s achievement • Calculated from a measure of student learning growth

  5. What is the Student Learning Growth Score? The difference between Current test score and Predicted test score What is the Predicted Student Score?

  6. What is the Predicted Student Score? It is score you would predict a student to achieve based on the student’s performance on prior tests and other information available on the student

  7. FLDOE Value-Added ModelVariables determining predicted score • Two or more years of prior achievement scores • Gifted status • Class size • Student Attendance (Days) • Mobility (number of transitions) • Difference from modal age in grade (indicator of retention) • The number of subject-relevant courses in which the student is enrolled • Homogeneity of entering test scores in the class

  8. FLDOE Value-Added ModelVariables determining predicted score • Students with Disabilities (SWD) status • Language impaired • Hearing impaired • Visually impaired • Emotional/behavioral • Specific learning disability • Dual sensory impaired • Autism spectrum disorder • Traumatic brain injury • Other health impaired • Intellectual disability • English Language Learner (ELL) status • LY

  9. FLDOE Value-Added ModelVariables not determining predicted score • Gender • Race • Ethnicity • Socioeconomic status

  10. What is the Student Learning Growth Score? Predicted - Current

  11. FLDOE Value-Added Model Variables determining student learning growth TERMS District Data Base of All Student Records

  12. What is the Predicted Student Score? …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… (FY11 FCAT) CURRENT TEST …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… PRIOR TEST (FY10 FCAT)

  13. What is the Predicted Student Score? …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… (FY11 FCAT) 900 800 CURRENT TEST 700 …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… PRIOR TEST (FY10 FCAT)

  14. W What is the Predicted Student Score? …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… (FY11 FCAT) 900 800 CURRENT TEST 700 600 500 400 300 …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… PRIOR TEST (FY10 FCAT)

  15. What is the Predicted Student Score? …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… (FY11 FCAT) Answer: Average of current scores of similar students 900 800 CURRENT TEST 700 PREDICTED SCORE 600 600 500 400 300 …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… PRIOR TEST (FY10 FCAT)

  16. Student Learning Growth is the Amount Above or Below Predicted Score …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… (FY11 FCAT) 900 800 ACTUAL SCORE CURRENT TEST Above Predicted Score 700 PREDICTED SCORE 600 600 500 Below Predicted Score 400 ACTUAL SCORE 300 …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… PRIOR TEST (FY10 FCAT)

  17. What is the Predicted Student Score? Based on Prior Achievement Based on Prior Achievement Only Based on Prior Achievement & ELL (FY11 FCAT) …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100… Each prior year test score has a Predicted current year test score. 90 800 CURRENT TEST 70 CURRENT TEST 600 50 400 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100… …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… PRIOR TEST (FY10 FCAT) PRIOR TEST

  18. FLDOE Value-Added ModelVariables determining student learning growth Two or more years of prior achievement scores Attendance Mobility (number of transitions) Difference from modal age in grade (indicator of retention) Class size The number of subject-relevant courses in which the student is enrolled Homogeneity of entering test scores in the class LY Gifted status Language impaired Hearing impaired Visually impaired Emotional/behavioral Specific learning disability Dual sensory impaired Autism spectrum disorder Traumatic brain injury Other health impaired Intellectual disability

  19. Reading Grade 7Indicators Ranked By Statistical Significance

  20. Illustrative Growth Points All other variables being equal *adapted from AIR materials presented at August 2, 2011,meeting These are illustrative values, not actual values

  21. What is the Predicted Student Score? …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… Based on Prior Achievement Only Based on Prior Achievement & ELL (FY11 FCAT) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100… 90 800 CURRENT TEST 70 CURRENT TEST 600 50 400 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100… …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… PRIOR TEST (FY10 FCAT) PRIOR TEST

  22. What is the Predicted Student Score? …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… Based on Prior Achievement Only Based on Prior Achievement & ELL (FY11 FCAT) (FY11 FCAT) 900 800 CURRENT TEST 700 CURRENT TEST 600 500 400 …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… PRIOR TEST (FY10 FCAT) (FY10 FCAT) PRIOR TEST

  23. What is the Predicted Student Score? …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… Based on Prior Achievement Only Based on Prior Achievement & Low Attendance (FY11 FCAT) (FY11 FCAT) 800 700 CURRENT TEST CURRENT TEST 600 500 400 300 …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… PRIOR TEST (FY10 FCAT) (FY10 FCAT) PRIOR TEST

  24. How to calculate the student learning growth score? …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… The diagonal line is the predicted growth observed among similar students. (FY11 FCAT) CURRENT TEST …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… PRIOR TEST (FY10 FCAT) DRE

  25. How to calculate the student learning growth score? …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… (FY11 FCAT) CURRENT TEST FY10 FY11 FY11 FY11 FCAT FCAT FCAT FCAT …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… PRIOR TEST (FY10 FCAT) DRE

  26. W How to calculate the student learning growth score? …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… (FY11 FCAT) CURRENT TEST FY10 FY11 FY11 FY11 FCAT FCAT FCAT FCAT 100 550 450 300 …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… PRIOR TEST (FY10 FCAT) DRE

  27. Y How to calculate the student learning growth score? …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… (FY11 FCAT) CURRENT TEST FY10 FY11 FY11 FY11 FCAT FCAT FCAT FCAT ? ? ? ? …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… PRIOR TEST (FY10 FCAT) DRE

  28. How to calculate the student learning growth score? …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… (FY11 FCAT) CURRENT TEST FY10 FY11 FY11 FY11 FCAT FCAT FCAT FCAT …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… PRIOR TEST (FY10 FCAT) DRE

  29. FY10 FY11 FY11 FY11 FCAT FCAT FCAT FCAT School Growth Score …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… (FY11 FCAT) CURRENT TEST …100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000… PRIOR TEST (FY10 FCAT) DRE

  30. Calculating Teacher Value-Added ScorePart 1 Student Growth Scores Teacher Effect School Component DRE

  31. Teacher VAM

  32. FLDOE Teacher Value-Added Score Conceptual ) ( ) ( + .5 X = Teacher Effect School Component DRE

  33. A Real Picture is Worth a Thousand Words =

  34. SDPBC Teacher VAM (Grade 5 Subject: Reading) Class >= 10 Mean = 3.3 N = 561

  35. State Teacher VAM (Grade 5 Subject: Reading) Mean = 0.1 N = 12182

  36. Teacher VAM Distribution for Reading

  37. What you need to receive a VAM score? • Assigned students • 10 or more students with a learning growth score • Instructional job code • Reading/math • Class, school, district

  38. Sample Elementary School

  39. Sample Middle School

  40. Sample High School

  41. Teachers Get What Score?JTEC • Teacher receives the value-added score based on the students assigned to them in TERMS who have a student growth score. • teacher < 10 students assigned to them who have a student growth score receive the school component score.

  42. Teachers Get What Score?JTEC • School indicates that the teacher receives the school component score. • Teacher assigned to one school receives school component score. • Teacher assigned to two schools receives the weighted average of the schools' component scores. • Teacher assigned to more than two schools receives District component score.

  43. School Component

  44. SDPBC School ComponentGrade 5 Subject: Reading Mean = 4.0 N = 120

  45. State School ComponentGrade 5 Subject: Reading Mean = 0.02 N = 2082

  46. School ComponentDistribution for Reading

  47. Established by Student Success Act (SB 736)Teacher Evaluation System Apply Weights IP = 60% SLG = 40% Final Rating HE Eff NI U Student Learning Growth (SLG) (4)Highly Effective (3) Effective (2) Needs Improvement (1) Unsatisfactory Instructional Practice (IP) (4)Highly Effective (3) Effective (2) Needs Improvement (1) Unsatisfactory

  48. VAM and School Component Estimated Distributions

  49. Highly Effective (13%) Teachers in Florida

  50. Effective (72%) Teachers in Florida

More Related