280 likes | 476 Views
Practical Issues in Mobile Education. Marguerite Koole, MDE. WMUTE, Athens November, 2006. Agenda. Marguerite Koole A definition of mLearning Overview of usability study Issues for practitioners. What is mLearning?.
E N D
Practical Issues in Mobile Education Marguerite Koole, MDE WMUTE, Athens November, 2006
Agenda Marguerite Koole • A definition of mLearning • Overview of usability study • Issues for practitioners
What is mLearning? • The Framework for the Rational Analysis of Mobile Education (FRAME) Model • Device characteristics • Individual learners • Groups of individuals
The devices • NetBook Pro 2003 • Mac Mini • Sony Vaio U71P • OQO 01 • Toshiba Libretto U100 • Dell Axim X50v • Palm Treo 600
Did you have to add software or peripherals before you could use the device? Did you find it necessary to read the instructions? Did you require assistance from anyone in order to operate the device? NBP=4/9 MacMini = 3/9 Sony Vaio = 8/9 OQO 01 = 9/9 Libretto = 9/9 Dell Axim = 8/9 Treo = 7/9 Ease of use ratings
Task completion ratings • Scale 0 to 4 0 = task could not be performed 1 = task possible, but with errors 2 = task performed, but with limitations 3 = task performed as desired 4 = device exceeded expectations
Read, draft & save document Set up wireless Send & receive email Browse Internet Access multimedia Access LMS Use synchronous communications Install Software Attach peripherals Use BT Move & use in different locations Use help feature Task completion ratings
F2F Debriefing • Recommended for colleagues: Axim & Treo • For travel • Not as main computer • Recommended for students (“serious study”): XP devices, Mac Mini
Limitations • Still considered complementary to desktop computers • Content and instructional strategies may change usage patterns • Small screens • Awkward input/output • Weak processing power • Limited memory • Difficult navigation • Difficult to scan
The amount of time the user must focus on device usage vs. The amount of time the user can focus on learning tasks Seek ways to reduce or limit cognitive load Prevent disorientation Reduce number of required actions Automate functions Transparency
Content Customization • Limitations fragmented experience • Chunking Miller’s Magical Number 7 (+/-2) • Patterns, granularity, context, prior-knowledge • Summaries, annotations, advance organizers • Greatest need: PDAs and cell phones
Flexibility • Time & place • Self-managed learning • Work, family commitments • Access course materials in variety of situations • Culturally sensitive learning experience • Easy to carry course materials • Light-weight, not bulky • New ways of using devices • Modify use, needs & design (cycle)
Information Access • Human & system access • Network variety Ubiquity Transmission range • Transfer information • Email, documents, Internet, multimedia objects, LMSs, VOIP , GSM/GPRS, CDMA • Timely & appropriate access to people & information
Cognitive advantages • Unique location & information access • Generate & contribute new information • Integrate perspectives • find own problems” • Memorize facts vs. locate appropriate information, create solutions • Multiple coding / dual coding • Reduced cognitive load
Social implications • Interaction with others • Sharing with other learners and instructors collaboration, co-create knowledge • Refer to others to help with abundance of information
Unforeseen Impacts • Changes in roles of teachers and students • Knowledge production knowledge navigation (Brown, 2005) • Reduce information noise • Recognize patterns and relationships • As information relationship, relevance, accuracy need for better judgment
Marguerite Koole • mkoole@athabascau.ca