200 likes | 330 Views
f 0 , Δ ++ , a 1 with ALICE. Sergey Kiselev, ITEP Moscow for the TOF group Introduction Input info and assumptions Acceptance Signal and background p+p Au+Au Summary. Introduction. SQM’07: short-lived resonances, motivation + last results.
E N D
f0, Δ++, a1 with ALICE • Sergey Kiselev, ITEP Moscow for the TOF group • Introduction • Input info and assumptions • Acceptance • Signal and background • p+p • Au+Au • Summary INFN, Bologna S.Kiselev
Introduction SQM’07:short-lived resonances, motivation + last results channel B.R.(%) c (fm)RHIC dataΔm (MeV)ALICE studies a1(1260) π ~0.5 0.5 ρ0(770)π+ π-~100 1.3 p+p/d+A/Au+Au -70 p+p/Au+Au Δ++(1232) p π+~100 1.6 p+p/d+Au -40 f0(980) π+ π- 66 2.6 p+p/Au+Au K*(892) πK ~100 4 p+p/d+Au/Au+Au -10 p+p/Au+Au Σ*(1385) Λπ 88 5.5 p+p/d+Au/Au+A 0 Λ*(1520) p K45 12.6 p+p/d+Au/Au+Au 0p+p/Au+Au Ξ*(1530) Ξπ~100 21 p+p/d+Au/Au+Au 0 ω(782) π+ π- π089 23 p+p/d+Au 0 ω(782) π0 9 23 p+p/d+Au/Au+Au 0 ω(782) π+ π- 2 23 ω(782) e+e-7 10-223 p+p/d+Au/Au+Au in prog. Φ(1020) K+ K-49 44 p+p/d+Au/Au+Au 0 p+p/Au+Au Φ(1020) e+e-3 10-244 p+p/d+Au/Au+Au in prog. Life Time f0, Δ++ and a1 will be analyzed INFN, Bologna S.Kiselev
Introduction – f0 motivation A. Badalà- SQM07- Levoča – 24/06/-29/06/07 Nuclear Modification Ratios (RCP) for resonances RHIC results have shown as, in the intermediate pt region, nuclear modification factors depend on the constituent quarks rather than on particle mass. Recent suggestion by Maiani et al. (Phys. Lett. B645(2007)138) to use this observable to solve the problem of the real quark composition of some resonances as the fo(980)( or ?) INFN, Bologna S.Kiselev
Introduction – a1 motivation • Volker Koch, workshop on dileptons at CBM, GSI, 2007: • in the case of afull restoration of the symmetry the spectral functions oftheρmeson and its chiral partner the a1 meson becomedegenerate. • it has been proposed to measure the a1 mass spectrumin a hot and dense medium and compare it to the massspectrum of the ρmeson • If the degeneracy wouldbe observed it is expected to serve as an unambigiousexperimental signal for the detection of chiral symmetryrestoration in the hot and dense medium. INFN, Bologna S.Kiselev
Input info – resonance parameters PYTHIA mass 1.0 width 0.0 Br.rat. decay products 0.520000 pi+ pi- 0.260000 pi0 pi0 0.110000 K+ K- 0.055000 K_L0 K_L0 0.055000 K_S0 K_S0 PDG f0 • mass 980 MeV, width 70 MeV, K+K-/π+π- with BR=0.11/0.52 mf < 2mK=988 MeV a1 mass 1260 MeV, width 400 MeV, πγ with Br=1 (enlarge statistics) INFN, Bologna S.Kiselev
Input info and assumptions • Background: SHAKER events • dNch/dy = const • pt distribution: π – fit to Tevatron data, others – mt scaling • K/π = 0.2, p/π = 0.074, /π0 = 0.17 • Signal: • dNres /dy = const, pt distribution – mt scaling • Ratios weakly depend on beam energy and event centrality: (dNres/dy)/ (dNch/dy) • f0/ π- = 0.07 (STAR data) 0.0275 • Δ++/p = 0.22 (STAR data) 0.0064 • a1+/ π+ = 0.013 (A.Andronic) 0.0051 • Cut pt > 0.2 GeV/c, momentum resolusion σp/p = 1% • No matter between a target and TOF/PHOS optimistic estimation of the signals INFN, Bologna S.Kiselev
Input and assumptions - ratios nucl-ex/0305034 nucl-ex/0403010 nucl-ex/0403026 nucl-ex/0510033 INFN, Bologna S.Kiselev
Input and assumptions - spectra nucl-ex/0305034 nucl-ex/0510033 mT scaling steeper than data INFN, Bologna S.Kiselev
Geometrical acceptance TOF: | - 900|<450 PHOS: | - 900|<100 Δ = 1000 INFN, Bologna S.Kiselev
p+p: signal and background p+p at LHC 106 SHAKER events with dNch/dy = 5 f0 K+K- f0 π+ π- like-sign orevent-mixing techniques should be used INFN, Bologna S.Kiselev
p+p: signal and backgroud Δ++ π+p a1+ π+γ like-sign or event-mixing techniques should be used INFN, Bologna S.Kiselev
p+p: S/B(2σ) even in p+p, signal from a1 is very small (real BR ~1%), S/B ~ 10-3 % ! INFN, Bologna S.Kiselev
p+p: S/B vs pt for pt study higher statistics, ~ 107, is needed INFN, Bologna S.Kiselev
p+p: S/B vs pt INFN, Bologna S.Kiselev
peripheral Au+Au: signal and backgroud f0 K+K- • dNch/dy = 2000 0 - 5 % centrality bin of Au+Au • dNch/dy = 125 60-65 % centrality bin of Au+Au • 104 SHAKER events with dNch/dy = 125 INFN, Bologna S.Kiselev
peripheral Au+Au: signal and backgroud f0 π+ π- Δ++ π+p INFN, Bologna S.Kiselev
p+p vs peripheral Au+Au S ~ dNch /dy, if B ~ (dNch/dy)2 S/B ~ (dNch/dy)-1, S/√(S+B) does not depend on dNch/dy to have S/√(S+B) ~ 10 ~105 events of a given centrality bin are needed INFN, Bologna S.Kiselev
Au+Au: other centralities Δ++ π+p for Δ++it works! S/B ~ (dNch/dy)-1 INFN, Bologna S.Kiselev
A question to the STAR team • f0 π+π- : ~107 min.bias p+p events ~106 Au+Au (40% - 80%) events dNch/dy = 125 - 20 • Δ++π+ p : ~6 106min.bias p+p events ~2 106Au+Au min.bias ~2 106Au+Au central ~107 d+Au min.bias dNch/dy = 4 - 15 • No info on S/B, only spectra and ratios • No a detailed paper, only short papers (SQM’03, QM’04, QM’05) • What are the S/B values? INFN, Bologna S.Kiselev
Summary • estimations of signals from the f0, Δ++ and a1 resonances with ALICE have been made • p+p: S/B ~ 10% for f0 and Δ++, ~10-3 % for a1 • Au+Au: S/B is smaller and follows S/B ~ (dNch/dy)-1, S/√(S+B)does not depends on dNch/dy • like-sign orevent-mixing techniques should be used to extract a signal • to have S/√(S+B)~10, 105 events of a given centrality are needed • S/B increases as a function of pt ~107 events are needed for the pt study INFN, Bologna S.Kiselev