390 likes | 571 Views
Gesture Recognition & Machine Learning for Real-Time Musical Interaction. Rebecca Fiebrink Assistant Professor of Computer Science (also Music) Princeton University. Nicholas Gillian Postdoc in Responsive Environments MIT Media Lab. Introductions. Outline.
E N D
Gesture Recognition & Machine Learning for Real-Time Musical Interaction Rebecca Fiebrink Assistant Professor of Computer Science (also Music) Princeton University Nicholas Gillian Postdoc in Responsive Environments MIT Media Lab
Outline • ~40 min: Machine learning fundamentals • ~1 hour: Wekinator: Intro & hands-on • ~1 hour: Eyesweb: Intro & hands-on • Wrap-up
Models in gesture recognition & mapping • What is the current state (e.g., pose)? • Was a control motion performed? • Ifso, which • How? • What sound should result from this state, motion, motion quality, etc.? sensed action interpretation model response (music, visuals, etc.) human + sensors sound, visuals, etc. computer
Supervised learning inputs training data algorithm model Training outputs
Supervised learning inputs “Gesture 1” “Gesture 2” “Gesture 3” training data algorithm model Training outputs Running “Gesture 1”
Why use supervised learning? • Models capture complex relationships from the data. (feasible) • Models can generalize to new inputs. (accurate) • Supervised learning circumvents the need to explicitly define mapping functions or models. (efficient)
Features • Each data point is represented as a feature vector
Features • Good features can make a problem easier to learn!
Classification feature2 This model: a separating line or hyperplane(decision boundary) feature1
Regression output This model: a real-valued function of the input features feature
Unsupervised learning • Training set includes examples, but no labels • Example: Infer clusters from data: feature2 feature1
Temporal modeling • Examples and inputs are sequential data points in time • Model used for following, identification, recognition Image: Bevilacqua et al., NIME 2007
Temporal modeling Image: Bevilacqua et al., NIME 2007
The learning problem • Goal: Build the best** model given the training data • Definition of “best” depends on context, assumptions…
Which classifier is best? “Underfit” “Overfit” Competing goals: Accurately model training data **Accurately classify unseen data points** Image from Andrew Ng
A simple classifier: nearest neighbor feature2 feature1 ?
Another simple classifier: Decision tree Images: http://ai.cs.umbc.edu/~oates/classes/2009/ML/homework1.html, http://nghiaho.com/?p=1300
AdaBoost: Iteratively train a “weak” learner Image from http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~kihwan23/imageCV/Final2005/FinalProject_KH.htm
Support vector machine • Re-map input space into a higher number of dimensions and find a separating hyperplane
Choosing a classifier: Practical considerations • k-Nearest Neighbor + Can tune k to adjust smoothness of decision boundaries - Sensitive to noisy, redundant, irrelevant features; prone to overfitting; weird in high dimensions • Decision tree:+ Can prune to reduce overfitting, produces human-understandable model - Can still overfit • AdaBoost + Theoretical benefits, less prone to overfitting + Can tune by changing base learner, number of training rounds • Support Vector Machine + Theoretical benefits similar to AdaBoost • Many parameters to tune, training can take a long time
How to evaluate which classifier is better? • Compute a quality metric • Metrics on training set (e.g, accuracy, RMS error) • Metrics on test set • Cross-validation • Use it Image from http://blog.weisu.org/2011/05/cross-validation.html
Neural Networks • TODO: Use nick’s slides
Which learning method should you use? • Classification (e.g., kNN, AdaBoost, SVM, decision tree): • Apply 1 of N labels to a static pose or state • Label a dynamic gesture, when segmentation & normalization are trivial • E.g., feature vector is a fixed-length window in time • Regression (e.g., with neural networks): • Produce a real-valued output (or vector of real-valued outputs) for each feature vector • Dynamic time warping, HMMs, other temporal models • Identify when a gesture has occurred, identify probable location within a gesture, possibly also apply a label • Necessary when segmentation is non-trivial or online following is needed
Suggested ML reading • Bishop, 2006: Pattern Recognition & Machine Learning. Science and Business Media, Springer • Duda, 2001: Pattern Classification, Wiley-Interscience • Witten, 2005: Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques, Morgan Kaufmann
Suggested NIME-y reading • Lee, Freed, & Wessel, 1992. Neural networks for simultaneous classification and parameter estimation in musical instrument control. Adaptive and Learning Systems, 1706:244–55. (early example of ML in music) • Hunt, A. and Wanderley, M. M. 2002. Mapping performer parameters to synthesis engines. Organised Sound 7, 2, 97–108. (learning as a tool for generative mapping creation) • Chapter 2 of Rebecca’s dissertation: http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~fiebrink/thesis/ (historical/topic overview) • Recent publications by F. Bevilacqua & team @ IRCAM (HMMs, gesture follower) • TODO: Nick, anything else?
The Wekinator: Running in real time Feature extractor(s) OSC .01, .59, .03, ... .01, .59, .03, ... .01, .59, .03, ... .01, .59, .03, ... time model(s) Inputs: from built-in feature extractors or OSC. Outputs: control ChucK patch or go elsewhere using OSC. 5, .01, 22.7, … 5, .01, 22.7, … 5, .01, 22.7, … 5, .01, 22.7, … time OSC Parameterizable process
Brief intro to OSC • Messages sent to host (e.g., localhost) and port (e.g., 6448) • Listener must listen on the same port • Message contains message string (e.g., “/myOscMessage”) and optionally some data • Data can be int, float, string types • Listener code may listen for specific message strings & data formats
Wekinator: Under the hood joystick_x joystick_y webcam_1 … Feature1 Feature2 Feature3 FeatureN Model1 Model2 ModelM … … Parameter1 Parameter2 ParameterM volume pitch 3.3098 Class24
Under the hood Learning algorithms: Classification: AdaBoost.M1 J48 Decision Tree Support vector machine K-nearest neighbor Regression: Multilayer perceptron NNs … Feature1 Feature2 Feature3 FeatureN Model1 Model2 ModelM … … Parameter1 Parameter2 ParameterM 3.3098 Class24
Interactive ML with Wekinator inputs “Gesture 1” “Gesture 2” “Gesture 3” training data algorithm model Training outputs “Gesture 1” Running
Interactive ML with Wekinator inputs “Gesture 1” “Gesture 2” training data algorithm model Training creating training data outputs “Gesture 1” Running
Interactive ML with Wekinator inputs “Gesture 1” “Gesture 2” training data model algorithm “Gesture 1” Training creating training data… evaluating the trained model outputs Running
Interactive ML with Wekinator inputs “Gesture 1” “Gesture 2” “Gesture 3” training data algorithm model interactive machine learning Training creating training data evaluating the trained model… modifying training data (and repeating) outputs “Gesture 1” Running
Time to play • Discrete classifier • Continuous neural net mapping • Free-for-all