1 / 17

Member Body Compliance Program

Member Body Compliance Program. Russell Guthrie, Executive Director. IESBA Meeting. New York, USA. October 19, 2011. Member Body Compliance Program. A Brief History. Program and Compliance Advisory Panel launched in 2004 as part of IFAC Reforms

garan
Download Presentation

Member Body Compliance Program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Member Body Compliance Program Russell Guthrie, Executive Director IESBA Meeting New York, USA October 19, 2011

  2. Member Body Compliance Program A Brief History • Program and Compliance Advisory Panel launched in 2004 as part of IFAC Reforms • Established 7 Statements of Membership Obligations (SMOs): • QA, Education, ISAs, Ethics, IPSASs, I&D, IFRS • PIOB oversight

  3. Compliance Program Focus Strategic Considerations • Supporting continuous improvement of strong PAOs through SMOs • Influence PAOs’ agendas and actions • Information and knowledge sharing • Collaboration with stakeholders

  4. Compliance Program Focus Continuous Development and Improvement • Part 1 – Information Gathering: Overview of regulatory and standard-setting framework in a member’s jurisdiction • Part 2 – Self-assessment: Benchmarking against the 7 SMOs • Part 3 – Own Strategy: Action Plans for development & continuous improvement in addressing the SMOs

  5. Impact / Achievements Beginning of the Road • Action Plans as first step: • Transparent plans for continuous improvement (153 out of 163 published) • Annual updates by all member bodies • Monitoring of progress by the CAP • Time and resources needed to achieve meaningful change • Outreach activities and policy advice provided by the IFAC Staff

  6. Impact / Achievements Enforcement – since 2005 • To date – key focus on commitment to and participation in the Compliance Program • Enforcement Actions • 43 suspension warnings • 18 suspensions • 9 expulsion warnings • 5 expulsions

  7. Uptake of the Code of Ethics Russia –Drivers of Local Modifications • Working on adoption of the recent Code • Adoption environment: • Ethics Committee of the Audit Council under Min Fin • Independence rules must eventually be aligned with Russian legislation • Initial proposal to start with existing Russian CoE (based of old and abbreviated version of IESBA Code) and then make necessary additions • Auditors and accountants need different Codes • IFAC Staff providing guidance and analysis to PAOs, Large Firms, MoF

  8. Uptake of the Code of Ethics Latin America – Multiple Stakeholders • Challenges: • Barriers of legal, institutional, cultural and financial nature • Lack of ongoing mechanism for adopting and implementing changes • Lack of current translation makes it difficult to discuss with regulators, analyze independence requirements and organize relevant communications and trainings • To achieve meaningful change a thorough cultural change is needed • IFAC coordinates formation of a Latin America Review Committee to facilitate translation at the regional level

  9. Uptake of the Code of Ethics France – More Stringent Requirements • Ministry of Justice adopts ethical requirements for CNCC: • Requirements for CNCC endorsed by MinJus in consultation with AMF (securities market regulator), and the H3C • Requirements are considered to be more stringent than IESBA Code • CSOEC drafts its ethical requirements to be approved by Ministry of Economy and Finance • Direct incorporation of IESBA code impossible due to a different structure (Ordinance of 1945, OEC bylaws, other doctrinal texts) • Both French Bodies are planning to promote the adoption of the recent IESBA CoE to the Government

  10. Uptake of the Code of Ethics Malawi – Direct Adoption • IFAC Member sets the ethical requirements through a mandate implied by general consensus • Adopted IESBA Code of Ethics in 2008 without any modifications • Issuing the current IESBA CoE with Jan 2012 effective date • Action Plan focus on implementation support

  11. Uptake of the Code of Ethics Overarching Themes • CoE clearly used as a major point of reference • Strong awareness among PAOs • Adoption challenges • Principles and rules at a national level often embedded in legislation, regulation and member body governance documents • Implementation challenges • Overcoming cultural barriers

  12. Tracking of Adoption – Challenges Complex National Environments • Government (MinFin, Ministry of Justice) • Regulators (Capital Market, Insurance, Banking) • Professional accountancy organizations • Cultural differences, even different understanding of the concept of morality

  13. Tracking of Adoption – Challenges Differing MB Constituencies • Auditors: • Big firms • SMPs • Professional Accountants in Business • Management Accountants • Public Finance Accountants • Accounting Technicians

  14. Tracking of Adoption – Challenges Different than Standards that Tend to be Adopted en Block

  15. Other Matters of Interest Moving Forward • SMO Revisions • Clarified no best endeavors where PAO has direct responsibility • Removed “no less stringent standards” langauge • How do we best track and articulate “adoption” of CoE and/or key independence provisions

  16. Other Matters of Interest Moving Forward • Who is will determine whether local modifications are substantive (i.e., lead to different outcomes)?

  17. International Federationof Accountants www.ifac.org

More Related