120 likes | 233 Views
V4 Expert Group Result Orientation Challenges 2014-2020. 16 – 17 June 2014 Budapest. Preparation of the 2014-2020 . May 2013 – Concept of a uniform methodological environment (UME) approved by Government
E N D
V4 Expert GroupResult Orientation Challenges2014-2020 16 – 17 June 2014 Budapest
Preparationofthe 2014-2020 May 2013 – Concept of a uniform methodological environment (UME) approved by Government • UME definesthe basic principles, approach and specifiestheareasofmethodolgicalenvironment • UME reflects: • EC legislation and new requirements (result orientation, performance framework, monitoring data etc.) • Experience of period 2007-2013 • UMEObjectives: • Standardization of procedures and processes • Effective use of resources • Simplification
Settingofindicators The Methodologicalguidance for the settingof indicators as a part of UME - approved by the Government in August 2013 • Defines binding rules including the requirement for theory of change • All MAs shallto set the model of intervention logic for each specific objective • Specifies methods of the design of indicators and their definitions Theaim: - to avoid theduplicity ofindicatorsand to ensure uniform monitoring - to setthemethodologically appropriate indicators • Outcome: National Sourcebook of Indicators
RelationofTheoryofchange and theindicators Problem causes change sought activities • Context indicators result indicators output indicators Conditions, external factors, other measures
Interventionlogic– keysteps • Whatisthecurrentsituation in thegivenproblem area? • Whatindicatorswillwe use to monitor changesoccurring in the area? • Whatisthemainproblem in the area, wewant to face and whatisitscausation? • Whichparticular cause/causes are wegoing to influence? • Whatchangewhichwilllead to eliminationoftheproblem do weseek to achieve? • Whatmeasures/activiteswillwe support to reachthechange?
Interventionlogic– keysteps • What are othermeasuresbeyondtheprogrammeorevenbeyondthe ESIF which are neccesarry to implement to reachthechange? • Underwhatconditions, whichhave to befulfilled, willthemeasures/activiteslead to thechange? • Whatindicatorswillwe use to monitor whetherthemeasures/activities are realizedsuccessfully (output indicators)? • Whatindicatorswillwe use to monitor whetherweachievedthechange (outcomeindicators)? • What are other (external) factorswhichmay influence (positivelyornegatively) achievingthechange? • When and howwillweassesswhetherwe are successfull in reachingthechange and eliminationoftheproblem (evalutaionsystem)?
Differentapproaches by ESF and ERDF • The split between ESF and ERDF approaches to the concept of result indicators - considerable problems in definitions of indicators. • ForprogrammesundertheERDF, CF and ETC isrequired to monitor changes in the whole area which is influenced by the intervention, on contrary forprogrammesunderthe ESF isrequired to monitor only changes at the supported population. • DR Regio directs their comments to the definition of context / statistical indicators that are distant from the interventions and their values are affected by a lot of external factors. • Statistical indicators cover the development of trends and their use is not completely coherent to the results based approach. • Itcausestheincrease pressure on the carryingouttheevaluations.
Establishing of milestones/goals Ourmilestones/goals are established on thebasisof: • Financialallocation • Needsanalysis • Experience of period 2007-2013 2014 - Guidance on monitoring of ESI Fund (approved by the Government) specifies the requirements for monitoring and evaluation of PF: • Specification of milestones for the year 2016 - only for national purpose • Specification of control limits for milestones and goals(minimal and critical)
Monitoring themilestones/goals • The NCA will carry out regular (quarterly) monitoring of status and progress of fullfilment of milestones as a part of risk management • In case of non-fulfilment the control limits – the MAs shall justified it and implemented the adequate measures (revision, increasingtheabsorptioncapacity, simplificationoftherulesetc.). • The NCA will inform annually the Government.
Link ofprogrammes to PartnershipAgreement Tool to clarifythelogic and links → matrix of PA logic Thematicobjective ↔ PA Strategicobjective ↔ PA Funding priority ↔ Identifiedproblem ↔ Developmentneed ↔ EU2020 target ↔ CSR ↔ NRP ↔ PositionPaper ↔ Programme ↔ Fund ↔ Priority axis ↔ Investment priority ↔ Specificobjective ↔ Indicators
Matrix ofPartnershipAgreementlogic Programmes, funds, priority axes, specificobjectives Identifiedproblem, developmentneed Investment priority Thematicobjective
Thankyouforyourattention. • www.mmr.cz • www.strukturalni-fondy.cz