320 likes | 390 Views
GODFREY HODGSON HOLMES TARCA. CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION. Overview of Accounting Theory. What is a theory? Hendriksen’s definition: … the coherent set of hypothetical, conceptual and pragmatic principles forming the general framework of reference for a field of inquiry.
E N D
GODFREYHODGSONHOLMESTARCA CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
Overview of Accounting Theory What is a theory? Hendriksen’s definition: …the coherent set of hypothetical, conceptual and pragmatic principles forming the general framework of reference for a field of inquiry.
Overview of Accounting Theory What is an accounting theory? Hendriksen’s definition: …logical reasoning in the form of a set of broad principles that • provide a general framework of reference by which accounting practice can be evaluated and • guide the development of new practices and procedures.
Overview of Accounting Theory • Whether a theory is accepted depends on how: • well it explains and predicts reality • well it is constructed both theoretically and empirically • acceptable its implications are
Overview of Accounting Theory • Accounting theory is a modern concept compared to mathematics or physics • Even Pacioli’s treatise on double-entry accounting focused on documenting practice and did not explain the underlying theoretical basis for it
Overview of Accounting Theory The development of accounting theory has been mostly unstructured Chambers: Accounting has frequently been described as a body of practices which have been developed in response to practical needs rather than by deliberate and systematic thinking.
Overview of Accounting Theory • Was developed to resolve problems as they arose – reactive • Ad hoc approach • Led to inconsistencies in practice • e.g. different depreciation methods • Accounting standard setting • Conceptual framework projects have not resolved inconsistency in practice
Pre-theory (1400s – 1800) Goldberg: No theory of accounting was devised from the time of Pacioli down to the opening of the nineteenth century.
Pragmatic accounting (1800– 1955) • The ‘general scientific period’ • based on empirical observation of practice • provided an explanation of accounting practice • focused on the existing ‘viewpoint’ of accounting
Normative accounting (1956-1970) • Sought to establish ‘norms’ for the best accounting practice • Focused on what should be (the ideal) v. what is
Normative accounting (1956-1970) • Degenerated into battles between competing viewpoints • Two groups dominated: • conceptual framework proponents • critics of historical cost
Normative accounting (1956-1970) • Factors prompting the demise of the normative period include: • the unlikelihood of one particular normative theory being generally accepted • the application of financial economic principles • the availability of empirical data and new testing methods
Normative accounting (1956-1970) • The major criticisms of normative theories were: • they do not necessarily involve empirical hypothesis testing • they are based on value judgements
Positive accounting (1950 to the present day) • A shift to a new form of empiricism called ‘positive theory’ • Had its origins in the ‘general scientific period’ • It seeks to explain the accounting practices being observed
Positive accounting (1950 to the present day) • Its objective is to explain and predict accounting practice e.g. the bonus plan hypothesis
Positive accounting (1950 to the present day) • It helps predict the reactions of ‘players’, such as shareholders, to the actions of managers and to reported accounting information
Positive accounting (1950 to the present day) • Major deficiencies are: • ‘wealth maximisation’ has become the answer to explain all accounting practices and reported information • it relies excessively on agency theory and dubious assumptions about the efficiency of markets
Positive accounting (1950 to the present day) • Behavioural research: • concerned with the sociological implications of accounting numbers and the associated actions of ‘key players’ • emerged in the 1950s • despite growing acceptance since the 1980s, positive accounting theory still dominates
Recent developments • Academic and professional developments in accounting theory have tended to take different approaches • Academic research focuses on capital markets, agency theory and behavioural aspects • The profession has sought a more normative approach – what accounting practices should be adopted
Recent developments • Conceptual framework – resurrected in 1980s • states the nature and purpose of financial reporting • Establishes criteria for deciding between alternative accounting practices • SACs 1–4
Recent developments • Conceptual framework – Recent Developments • Joint project between IASB & FASB • International harmonisation of accounting practices through a single consistent set of international financial reporting standards (IFRS)
Recent developments • The conceptual framework underpinning the IFRS favours a move toward • accounting practices that provide information for enhancing decision making by investors and others • recognising all gains and losses in the accounting periods in which they occur • measurement using exit values
Content outline • Part 1: Accounting theory (chapters 1 – 3) • Part 2: Theory contributing to practice (chapters 4 – 10) • Part 3: Accounting and research (chapters 11 – 14)
Summary • Accounting theory • Major periods of accounting theory development • Normative accounting • Positive accounting • Conceptual framework • IFRS
Key terms and concepts • Theory • Accounting theory • Normative theory • Positive theory • Behavioural theory • Conceptual framework • IFRS