1 / 14

ClearSupport Project Riga 2. June 20088

ClearSupport Project Riga 2. June 20088. Vagn Bendz Jørgensen. Framework for report 4.1. Objectives WP 4: Bringing in front RUE in buildings Main focus on building retrofitting Minor focus: design for RUE in new buildings Bringing standard solutions into use

garrett-heaph
Download Presentation

ClearSupport Project Riga 2. June 20088

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ClearSupport ProjectRiga 2. June 20088 Vagn Bendz Jørgensen

  2. Framework for report 4.1 • Objectives WP 4: • Bringing in front RUE in buildings • Main focus on building retrofitting • Minor focus: design for RUE in new buildings • Bringing standard solutions into use • Focus on residential buildings and municipal public buildings • Preparing a limited number of retrofitting concepts/application

  3. WP 4: Deliverables • D4.1Report on costs and energy savings for RUE in buildings measures • D4.2Report on the regional/local impact of RUE measures in buildings • D4.3Report on EU-wide energy saving potential of RUE • D4.4RUE Technology guide/catalogue for Project Service Facilities (including standard measures)

  4. Saving potential – Baltic Countries • LV: Residential, standard app. 30-50%, good data 15PJ savings, public buildings 20-60% • LT: Apartments buildings before 1993. 10,8 PJ Single/double fam. Houses 5.8 PJ, public buildings: 6,2 PJ • PL (Pommeranian): Apartment buildings before 1988 6,6 PJ, (25%). Public buildings: 18-23%

  5. Saving potential – CZ, Slov. Crete • CZ: Residential 50%, older buildings most potential. Thermal insulation 30-40%, heating systems 10-25%. Public buildings: Energy management (5-15%), • Slov: Residential buildings: technical 60%, economical 30%. 9 PJ, public 30%, 1,1 PJ • Crete: Average saving for residential: 18%.Public buildings: 20%. Average 127 kWh/m2/a for residential in Crete

  6. Saving measures • LV: 3 groups: 3 groups from simple to major overhaul. Savings 25%, 40%, 50-60% total. • LT: 20 individual measures from roofs to ventilation. • PL: 10 measures • CZ: measures related to building type • Slov: 10 options. From sealing to solar • Crete: 9 measures: slope roof, sealing, optimize heat supply, solar

  7. Eurima, Windows replacement

  8. ClearSupport - example

More Related