1 / 7

Outcome of Discussions on Soil Health by STCR/STFRS

Outcome of Discussions on Soil Health by STCR/STFRS. Working Group 2 NeGP – A. It has been implemented in Maharashtra Would be extended to 15 States by 31 st August 2014 Statewise recommendations to be finalised by NIC Pune & IISS Bhopal

garrison-tillman
Download Presentation

Outcome of Discussions on Soil Health by STCR/STFRS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Outcome of Discussions on Soil Health by STCR/STFRS Working Group 2 NeGP – A

  2. It has been implemented in Maharashtra • Would be extended to 15 States by 31st August 2014 • Statewise recommendations to be finalised by NIC Pune & IISS Bhopal • Workflow and database fields of West Bengal including input and output screens for the SHC application to be circulated to all States • Integration of existing data from States who want to continue using their own system so that the entire data will be at one place

  3. There should be uniform software for all States • On selection of an area, the software should determine whether STCR or STCR-FYM or STFRS is applicable • Multiple options for collection of data (soil samples) and record • Types of Labs should appear from a drop down list • The list of source of samples to be standardised

  4. Facility to enter multiple Khasra/Plot numbers • UNITS of application of fertlisers and recommendations by the software may be fixed by choice for example: kg/tonne/quintals per ha/acre/bigha • Census codes to be used • Blocks to mapped with NARP zones • SAU’s should be involved for vetting the outcome of methods applicable for soil testing • Data on soil types and texture to be collected and made available as basic/master data

  5. Provision should also exist to upload data in offline mode where Internet connectivity isn’t available so that data may be uploaded when connectivity is available – a problem that may be looked into. • SAUs should be involved in the development of software and should also be vetted by IISS • The application should be user friendly – reduce keyboard fatigue

  6. Availability of Core Competency in the area • Success stories available • Upbeat farming and research communities S • Plagued with internal operating problems – • Ill equipped laboratories • Negative attitude • Demoralisedstaff • Weak image • Underutilised facilities W • Strong will to introduce ICT in Soil Testing • Growth of awareness on Soil Testing and its usefulness • To serve or cater to new segments • Turf wars • Disruptions – through preemptive designs • Unavailability of ICT with Internet connectivity • Unskilled manpower at work T O

  7. Action Plan: • Fixation of Strategy for Development and Deployment • Identification of the Scope of Activities for execution • Identification of Resources as per the Scope • Fixation of Time Frame as per the Scope • Estimation of expenditure for deployment of resources within the time frame • Official responsible for implementation of this service at a location should not be moved out or transferred • The official be so chosen that he/she is sufficiently away from superannuation

More Related