270 likes | 594 Views
Chapter 5: Bend or Break. The Pragmatic Programmer. Decoupling and the Law of Demeter. Write “shy” code. Limits Visibility Organize code into modules Eliminates Unnecessary Interactions Limit the number of calls to other modules. Minimize Coupling.
E N D
Chapter 5: Bend or Break The Pragmatic Programmer
Decoupling and the Law of Demeter • Write “shy” code. • Limits Visibility • Organize code into modules • Eliminates Unnecessary Interactions • Limit the number of calls to other modules
Minimize Coupling • “We do not want the object to give us a third-party object that we have to deal with to get the required service” • When we need a service it should be preformed on our behalf. • Bad:public void plotDate(Date aDate, Selection aSelection) { TimeZone tz = aSelection.getRecorder().getLocation().getTimeZone();...} • Good:public void plotDate(Date aDate, TimeZone aTz) {...}plotDate(someDate, someSelection.getTimeZone());
Coupling Problems • In large projects, the command linking a unit test is longer than the unit test. • “Simple” Changes to one module propagate through unrelated modules. • The developers are afraid to change code because they aren't sure what will be affected.
Law of Demeter • Any method of an object should only call methods belonging to: • Itself • Parameters passed to it • Object it created • Directly held component objects (c.print();)
Changes to details cause problems So: Get the details out of the code! Metaprogramming
Tip: Configure, don’t integrate. Use metadata to get configuration data OUT of the code body. Dynamic Configuration
“Data about data” • Any data that describes the application • Generally, used at runtime • Examples • Windows .ini files • X11 Metadata
Program for the general case Keep specifics outside the main code base Many benefits* Leave the details out, so easier to change Metadata beyond preferences…
Application: Find what changes most, and attempt to code your program in such a way that you can change the metadata to adapt. Don’t write dodo code Bend or Break
Temporal Coupling • Decouple temporally by allowing for concurrency
Analyze workflow for concurrency • You already do it normally • Design using services • Independent • Concurrent • Consistent interfaces Workflow
Architecture • Taking advantage of temporal decoupling makes programs easier to write. • Use queues to decouple tasks. • Multiple threads can feed off the queues. • The hungry consumer model replaces the central scheduler with multiple independent consumer tasks
Cleaner Interfaces • Always design for Concurrency • Considering time ordered can lead to cleaner and more maintainable interfaces. • Promotes interfaces without bugs and surprises.
Model-View-Controller • Modules accomplish well-defined responsibilities • Once those are created, how will they communicate? • Events signal other modules that “something interesting happens.”
Publish/Subscribe • Objects should only receive events they need • There should only be one publisher to send events. • Subscribers need only to register with the publisher to receive event notifications.
Model View Controller • Separate views from models. • Provides flexibility • Allows from non traditional multiple controllers. • Model. Abstract data model representing the target object. • View. It Subscribes to changes in the model and logical events from the controller. • Controller. A way to control the view and provide the model with new data. It publishes events to the model and view.
Coupling • Listeners and event generators still have some knowledge of each other: They must agree on common interface definitions. • There even more are ways of reducing coupling. • Web applications
Shared memory space • Originally intended for AI systems • Allows for a totally decoupled system • Content coupling • Temporal coupling • Single, consistent interface