1 / 24

Uniform Resource Identifiers

Uniform Resource Identifiers. Jacek Kope cký WSML Working Group June 2004. Overview . History of URIs URI syntax URI references and their resolution Good practices for creating URIs Interesting issues. URI History. Universal Resource Identifiers (RFC 1630, June 1994)

gaurav
Download Presentation

Uniform Resource Identifiers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Uniform Resource Identifiers Jacek Kopecký WSML Working Group June 2004

  2. Overview • History of URIs • URI syntax • URI references and their resolution • Good practices for creating URIs • Interesting issues Jacek Kopecký, jacek.kopecky@deri.org

  3. URI History • Universal Resource Identifiers (RFC 1630, June 1994) • Uniform Resource Locators and Names • RFC 2396, August 1998 • 2396bis in development • Originally “Universal”, later “Uniform” as a compromise • “Universal” again preferred by TimBL Jacek Kopecký, jacek.kopecky@deri.org

  4. URLs and URNs • Locators (addresses) vs. Names • URNs not easily dereferencable • URNs can be made dereferencable by infrastructure • URLs perceived as less persistent • URLs and URNs drifting towards middle ground • http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/NameMyth.html • No point in making the distinction any more Jacek Kopecký, jacek.kopecky@deri.org

  5. Uniform Resource Identifiers • URIs “identify” “resources” • Identification doesn’t imply interaction • Resource is a sameness of characteristics over time • Latest blog rant • Latest blog rant on politics • Blog rant on politics from 2004-6-22 • Resource need not be accessible when URI is created • Pictures from my future trip to London will be at http://jacek.cz/photos/2004-08-london Jacek Kopecký, jacek.kopecky@deri.org

  6. URI Syntax • According to 2396bis • http://www.apache.org/~fielding/uri/rev-2002/rfc2396bis.html • Examples • http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt • mailto:John.Doe@example.com • news:comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix • telnet://melvyl.ucop.edu/ • URI Syntax - simplified • scheme: [//authority] [/path] [?query] [#fragid] • Relative URI without “scheme:” • Dot path segments (‘.’ and ‘..’) treated specially Jacek Kopecký, jacek.kopecky@deri.org

  7. URI Syntax cont’d • Reserved characters (like /:?#@$&+* ) • Many allowed characters • Rest of UNICODE percent-encoded from UTF-8 • http://google.com/search?q=kopeck%C3%BD • Percent-encoding allowed characters creates equivalent URIs • But namespaces compared char-by-char Jacek Kopecký, jacek.kopecky@deri.org

  8. URI Reference Resolution • Resolving URI A against base URI B • Going from the left, keep as much from B as is undefined in A • First part of A replaces that part from B • Path resolution special • If A has absolute path, that is taken • Relative path from A resolved against path from B, removing dot segments from result • Everything after first part of A taken from A • Fragment always taken from A Jacek Kopecký, jacek.kopecky@deri.org

  9. URI Ref. Resolution Examples • Base URI: http://a/b/c/d?e#f • g = http://a/b/c/g • . = http://a/b/c/ • ./ = http://a/b/c/ • ./g = http://a/b/c/g • .. = http://a/b/ • ../ = http://a/b/ • ../g = http://a/b/g • ../../g = http://a/g • ../../../g = http://a/g Jacek Kopecký, jacek.kopecky@deri.org

  10. URI Ref. Resolution Examples • Base URI: http://a/b/c/d?e#f • /./g = http://a/g • //g = http://g • #s = http://a/b/c/d?e#s • g#s = http://a/b/c/g#s • ?y = http://a/b/c/d?y • g?y = http://a/b/c/g?y • g?y#s = http://a/b/c/g?y#s • g:h = g:h • ./g:h = http://a/b/d/g:h Jacek Kopecký, jacek.kopecky@deri.org

  11. Base URIs • Necessary when resolving URI references • Explicit base URI embedded in content • <link xml:base=“http://example.com/bar/” href=“x.html” /> • URI of the document • Usual in HTML files on the web • App-dependent base URI default Jacek Kopecký, jacek.kopecky@deri.org

  12. URI Equivalence • Do two URIs identify the same resource? • Comparing without accessing the resources • Various applications for URI comparison • Increasing cache efficiency • Comparing the namespaces of two symbols • Algorithms must avoid false positives • False negatives unavoidable • http://weather.example.com/innsbruck • http://jacek.cz/innsbruckweather redirect to above Jacek Kopecký, jacek.kopecky@deri.org

  13. Uses of URIs • Addresses on the Web • Namespaces in XML QNames • Namespaces in QNames in other languages • Identifiers of things and concepts (e.g. RDF) • Unique keys (e.g. MIME message ID) Jacek Kopecký, jacek.kopecky@deri.org

  14. QName • Introduced in XML Namespaces • Name of an XML namespace-qualified element • RDF uses QNames for brevity of URI notation • XML Schema expanded use of QNames to further things (6 symbol spaces) • Every following language uses QNames as identifiers • Number of independent symbol spaces • => Turning QNames into URIs is cumbersome • Should have been as simple as in RDF (IMHO) Jacek Kopecký, jacek.kopecky@deri.org

  15. Creating URIs for Web Resources • Versioning approach for persistence • http://w3.org/TR/soap vs. • http://w3.org/TR/soap12 vs. • http://w3.org/TR/2003/REC-soap12-part1-20030624/ • Simple, memorable URIs • http://jacek.cz/blog • Scribbled on a napkin • Correcting spelling and case helps – mod_speling • Making the “www.” prefix optional (both ways) helps • Content negotiation – drop .html (.php, .asp) • URI changes harmful Jacek Kopecký, jacek.kopecky@deri.org

  16. Creating Example URIs • http://example.com • http://example.net • http://example.org • Reserved for precisely this purpose • Or use own domain (deri.org, wsmo.org) • http://foo.com not good Jacek Kopecký, jacek.kopecky@deri.org

  17. Creating URIs for Namespaces • Dereferencable, ending with ‘/’ or ‘#’ • Canonical URIs – no unnecessary dot segments or percent-encoding • Namespaces compared char-by-char • Namespace document • Preferably in the language that uses the namespace – enables automatic discovery • With human-oriented descriptions • To allow for the above, don’t share namespace URIs for schema and WSDL Jacek Kopecký, jacek.kopecky@deri.org

  18. Creating URIs for Concepts • Group concepts in a common, dereferencable namespace • Each concept identified by its fragID • In RDF/XML, namespace ends with ‘#’ • Namespace document describes the concepts • Two problems • FragIDs depend on media types • Can http://example.com/#car identify a car? Jacek Kopecký, jacek.kopecky@deri.org

  19. Fragment IDs in URIs • Fragment ID identifies a secondary resource • Interpretation of fragment IDs depends on media type • In HTML <a name=“foo”> • In XML <element xml:id=“foo”/> • No meaning in JPEG • xml:id in development • So far language-dependent (often DTD) solutions • Fragment IDs should mean the same thing across media types with content negotiation Jacek Kopecký, jacek.kopecky@deri.org

  20. Range of HTTP URIs? • Open W3C TAG issue • Can http: URI identify a car? • Can I say http://jacek.cz/dragstar/ is my motorbike? • TimBL doesn’t seem to think so • Is it necessary to distinguish between a thing and a description of that thing? Jacek Kopecký, jacek.kopecky@deri.org

  21. Other Interesting Issues • data: URI scheme – the URI is the resource • RFC 2397 • … • mailto: scheme a misnomer • URIs don’t specify actions but identifiers • uuid: scheme for unique identifiers • Good for transient identification in closed systems • Mismatches between perceived and intended meaning of a resource • http://w3.org/tr/soap • Should URIs be human-readable? • http://www.bscw.semanticweb.org/bscw/bscw.cgi/0/21621 Jacek Kopecký, jacek.kopecky@deri.org

  22. Main Points • Cool URIs don’t change • URIs can be (and are) scribbled on napkins • URIs don’t (necessarily) point to documents • Dereferencable URIs also good as names • URLs, URNs obsolete Jacek Kopecký, jacek.kopecky@deri.org

  23. References • http://www.apache.org/~fielding/uri/rev-2002/rfc2396bis.html • http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt • http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI • http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Architecture.html • http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Axioms.html • http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/NameMyth.html Jacek Kopecký, jacek.kopecky@deri.org

  24. Hope it Helped • Thanks for your attention • Questions? Comments? • jacek.kopecky@deri.org Jacek Kopecký, jacek.kopecky@deri.org

More Related