1 / 94

TGaz Next Generation Positioning May Meeting Agenda

Authors:. TGaz Next Generation Positioning May Meeting Agenda. Date : 2019-05-13. IEEE 802.11 Task Group AZ Next Generation Positioning. Atlanta, Georgia May 12 th - 17 th , 2019 Chair: Jonathan Segev (Intel Corporation ) Vice Chair : Assaf Kasher (Qualcomm)

gauthier
Download Presentation

TGaz Next Generation Positioning May Meeting Agenda

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation Authors: TGaz Next Generation Positioning May Meeting Agenda Date:2019-05-13

  2. IEEE 802.11Task Group AZNext Generation Positioning Atlanta, Georgia May 12th - 17th, 2019 Chair: Jonathan Segev (Intel Corporation) • Vice Chair: Assaf Kasher (Qualcomm) Technical Editors: Chao Chun Wang (MediaTek), Roy Want (Google) Secretary: Assaf Kasher (acting) Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  3. Abstract • This submission contains the IEEE 802.11 TGaz Next Generation Positioning agenda for the May meeting. Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  4. Logistics • Attendance: • https://imat.ieee.org/attendance • You must register before logging attendance. • You must log attendance during each 2 hour session. • Documentation • https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/documents • Use “TGaz” folder for documents relating to the TGaz activity. Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  5. Patent Policy • Following 5 slides Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  6. Instructions for the WG Chair • The IEEE-SA strongly recommends that at each WG meeting the chair or a designee: • Show slides #1 through #4 of this presentation • Advise the WG attendees that: • IEEE’s patent policy is described in Clause 6 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws; • Early identification of patent claims which may be essential for the use of standards under development is strongly encouraged; • There may be Essential Patent Claims of which IEEE is not aware. Additionally, neither IEEE, the WG, nor the WG Chair can ensure the accuracy or completeness of any assurance or whether any such assurance is, in fact, of a Patent Claim that is essential for the use of the standard under development. • Instruct the WG Secretary to record in the minutes of the relevant WG meeting: • That the foregoing information was provided and that slides 1 through 4 (and this slide 0, if applicable) were shown; • That the chair or designee provided an opportunity for participants to identify patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) of which the participant is personally aware and that may be essential for the use of that standard • Any responses that were given, specifically the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that were identified (if any) and by whom. • The WG Chair shall ensure that a request is made to any identified holders of potential essential patent claim(s) to complete and submit a Letter of Assurance. • It is recommended that the WG Chair review the guidance in IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual 6.3.5 and in FAQs 14 and 15 on inclusion of potential Essential Patent Claims by incorporation or by reference. • Note: WG includes Working Groups, Task Groups, and other standards-developing committees with a PAR approved by the IEEE-SA Standards Board. Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  7. Participants have a duty to inform the IEEE • Participants shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed) of the identity of each holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents • Participants should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed) of the identity of any other holders of potential Essential Patent Claims • Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is encouraged Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  8. Ways to inform IEEE • Cause an LOA to be submitted to the IEEE-SA (patcom@ieee.org); or • Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible; or • Speak up now and respond to this Call for Potentially Essential Patents • If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance, please respond at this time by providing relevant information to the WG Chair. Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  9. Other guidelines for IEEE WG meetings • All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. • Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. • Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. • Relative costs of different technical approaches that include relative costs of patent licensing terms may be discussed in standards development meetings. • Technical considerations remain the primary focus • Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. • Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. • Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object. • --------------------------------------------------------------- • For more details, see IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5.3.10 and Antitrust and Competition Policy: What You Need to Know at http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/antitrust.pdf Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  10. Patent-related information The patent policy and the procedures used to execute that policy are documented in the: • IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws(http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6 ) • IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual(http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/opman/sect6.html#6.3 ) Material about the patent policy is available at http://standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/patcom/materials.html If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@ieee.org Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  11. Participation in IEEE 802 Meetings • All participation in IEEE 802 Working Group meetings is on an individual basis • •     Participants in the IEEE standards development individual process shall act based on their qualifications and experience. (https://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/sb_bylaws.pdf section 5.2.1) • •    IEEE 802 Working Group membership is by individual; “Working Group members shall participate in the consensus process in a manner consistent with their professional expert opinion as individuals, and not as organizational representatives”. (http://ieee802.org/PNP/approved/IEEE_802_WG_PandP_v19.pdf section 4.2.1) • You have an obligation to act and vote as an individual and not under the direction of any other individual or group. Your obligation to act and vote as an individual applies in all cases, regardless of any external commitments, agreements, contracts, or orders. • You shall not direct the actions or votes of any other member of an IEEE 802 Working Group or retaliate against any other member for their actions or votes within IEEE 802 Working Group meetings, see https://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/sb_bylaws.pdf section 5.2.1.3 and http://ieee802.org/PNP/approved/IEEE_802_WG_PandP_v19.pdf section 3.4.1, list item x • By participating in IEEE 802 meetings, you accept these requirements. If you do not agree to these policies then you shall not participate. Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  12. 802 Ground rules • Respect … give it, get it • NO product pitches • NO corporate pitches • NO prices • NO restrictive notices • Presentations must be openly available Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  13. IEEE-SA policy documents • IEEE Code of Ethics • http://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html • IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) Affiliation FAQ • http://standards.ieee.org/faqs/affiliation.html • Antitrust and Competition Policy • http://standards.ieee.org/resources/antitrust-guidelines.pdf • Letter of Assurance Form • http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/sect6-7.html#loa • https://development.standards.ieee.org/myproject/Public//mytools/mob/loa.pdf • IEEE-SA Patent Committee FAQ & Patent slides • http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/faq.pdf and http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  14. The current version of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws is available at:  • http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/index.html (HTML version)  • http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/sb_bylaws.pdf (PDF version) • The current version of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual is available at:  • http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/opman/index.html (HTML version)  • http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/opman/sb_om.pdf (PDF version)  Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  15. TGaz Schedule at a glance Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  16. Agenda for the Week • Review IEEE-SA patent policy, duty to inform, call for potential essential patents, guidelines for anti-trust and competition laws and participation on individual basis in IEEE 802 meeting. • Agenda setting for the week. • Approve previous meeting minutes (11-19-458). • Approve March/April teleconferences minutes (11-19-577,11-19-606, 11-19-634) • CR assignment and current status of open call for CR volunteers. (11-19-431) • TGaz PAR extension • Consider comment resolution for adoption. • Review target ad hoc meeting dates towards the July meeting. • Consider comment resolution submission. • Consider any other technical material. Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  17. Submission List for the week (1) Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  18. Submission List for the week (2) Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  19. Submission List for the week (3) Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  20. Meeting Slot # 1 discussion items • Review IEEE-SA patent policy, duty to inform, call for potential essential patents, guidelines for anti-trust and competition laws and participation on individual basis in IEEE 802 meeting (7min) • Review submissions ordering for the week (23 min) • Approve previous meeting minutes (11-19-458) (5 min) • Approve March/April teleconferences minutes (11-19-577,11-19-606, 11-19-634) (10min) • CR assignment and current status of open call for CR volunteers. (11-19-431) (20min) – rescheduled to later slot. • TGaz PAR Extension (11-19-732) (15min) • Review target ad hoc meeting dates towards the July meeting (10min) • Consider comment resolution for adoption (25min) • Consider postponed motion on submission 11-19-331r3 (15min) • Consider comment resolution submission(as time permits). Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  21. Presentation ordering for slot # 1 Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  22. Approval of previous meeting minutes • Document 11-19/458 “meeting minutes March 2019” posted to Mentor on March 22nd 2019. • Motion: • Move to approve document 11-19/458 r0 as TGaz meeting minutes for the March meeting. • Moved by: Roy Want • Seconded by: Ganesh Venkatesan • Results (Y/N/A): 26/0/1 • Motion passes Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  23. Approval of March/April Telecon Minutes • Document 11-19/577r0 “Telecon Minutes March 27th, 2019” posted to Mentor on April 2nd 2019. • Motion: • Move to approve document 11-19/577r0 as TGazmeeting minutes for the March 27th Telecon. • Moved by: Roy Want • Seconded by: Jerome Henry • Results (Y/N/A): 26/0/1 • Motion passes Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  24. Approval of March/April Telecon Minutes • Document 11-19/606r0 “Telecon Minutes Apr 3rd, 2019” posted to Mentor on April 10th 2019. • Motion: • Move to approve document 11-19/606r0 as TGazmeeting minutes for the April 3rdTelecon. • Moved by: Ganesh Venkatesan • Seconded by: Roy Want • Results (Y/N/A): 23/0/1 • Motion passes Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  25. Approval of March/April Telecon Minutes • Document 11-19/634r0 “Telecon Minutes Apr 10th, 2019” posted to Mentor on April 10th 2019. • Motion: • Move to approve document 11-19/634r0 as TGazmeeting minutes for the April 10thTelecon. • Moved by: Assaf Kasher • Seconded by: Jerome Henry • Results (Y/N/A):24/0/1 • Motion passes Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  26. Approval of March/April Telecon Minutes • Document 11-19/680r0 “Telecon Minutes Apr 24th , 2019” posted to Mentor on May 1st 2019. • Motion: • Move to approve document 11-19/680r0 as TGazmeeting minutes for the April 24thTelecon. • Moved by: Assaf Kasher • Seconded by: Roy Want • Results (Y/N/A): 22/0/1 • Motion passes Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  27. Approval of May Ad hoc Minutes – to be reviewed at a later time • Document 11-19/706r0 “Meeting Minutes Ad hoc May 2019” posted to Mentor on May 12th 2019. • Motion: • Move to approve document 11-19/706r0 as TGazmeeting minutes for the May ad-hoc. • Moved by: • Seconded by: • Results (Y/N/A): Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  28. June/July ad hoc meeting dates • To enable sufficient discussion time to continue comment resolution review for comments received during LB240. • Have an ad-hoc between each of the upcoming IEEE weeks: • Week of July 8th, exact dates TBA in accordance with venue availability. Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  29. TGaz PAR Extension • Motion • • Believing that the PAR extension contained in the document referenced below meets IEEE-SA guidelines, • • Request that the PAR contained in 11-19-732r1 be posted to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) agenda for WG 802 preview and EC approval to submit to NesCom. • Moved: Assaf Kasher • Seconded: Jerome Henry • Result (Y/N/A): 24/0/0 • Motion passes. Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  30. 11-19-431 Comment Assignment Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  31. Comment Resolution from Ad Hoc and Telecon • Motion • Move to adopt the resolutions depicted by document 11-19-558r1 for CID 1025, 1420, 1016, 2446, 2448, 1418, 1417, 1419, 1234, 1860, instruct the technical editor to incorporate it in the P802.11az draft and grant the editor editorial license. • Moved: Assaf Kasher • Second: Ganesh Venkatesan • Results (Y/N/A): 20/0/3 • Motion passes • Results in the Mar. 27thtelecon (Y/N/A): 9/0/0 Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  32. Comment Resolution from Ad Hoc and Telecon • Motion • Move to adopt the resolutions depicted by document 11-19-579r3 for CID 1025, 1420, 1016, 2446, 2448, 1418, 1417, 1419, 1234, 1860, instruct the technical editor to incorporate it in the P802.11az draft and grant the editor editorial license. • Moved: Assaf Kasher • Second: Ali Raissinia • Results (Y/N/A): 23/0/2 • Motion passes • Results in the Mar. 27thtelecon (Y/N/A): 11/0/0 Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  33. Comment Resolution from Ad Hoc and Telecon • Motion • Move to adopt the resolutions depicted by document 11-19-603r1 for CID 1580, 2283 and 1163 instruct the technical editor to incorporate it in the P802.11az draft and grant the editor editorial license. • Moved: Yongho Seok • Second: Ganesh Venkatesan • Results (Y/N/A): 24/0/2 • Results in the Apr. 3rdtelecon (Y/N/A): 10/0/0 Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  34. Comment Resolution from Ad Hoc and Telecon • Motion • Move to adopt the resolutions depicted by document 11-19-622r1 for CID 1009, 2020, 1486, 1487, 1758, 2391, 1488, 1913 1735, 1093, instruct the technical editor to incorporate it in the P802.11az draft and grant the editor editorial license. • Moved: Assaf Kasher • Second: Ganesh Venkatesan • Results (Y/N/A): 24/0/3 • Results in the Apr. 10thtelecon (Y/N/A): 8/0/0 Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  35. Comment Resolution from Ad Hoc and Telecon • Motion: • Move to adopt the resolutions depicted by document11-19-646r1 for CIDs 2053, 2055, 1449, 1451, 2091, 2093, 1684, 2251, 2336, 1214, 1215, 1223, 1070, 1071, 1075, 1400, 1401, 1402, 1493, 1403, 1404, 1405, 1406, 1407, 1408, 1385, 1226, 2440, 1662, 1685, 1686, 1074, 2252, 1428, 1094 and 1076, instruct the technical editor to incorporate it in the P802.11az draft and grant the editor editorial license. • Moved: Assaf Kasher • Second: Yongho Seok • Results (Y/N/A): 19/0/2 • Motion passes • Results in the ad hoc (Y/N/A): 8/0/0 Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  36. Comment Resolution from Ad Hoc and Telecon • Motion: • Move to adopt the resolutions depicted by document 11-19-702r1 for CIDs 1472, 1890, 1893, 1984, 2158, 2159, 2160, 2161, 2162, 2163, 2165, 2166, 2167 and 2168, instruct the technical editor to incorporate it in the P802.11az draft and grant the editor editorial license. • Moved: Jerome Henry • Second: Ganesh Venkatesan • Results (Y/N/A): 22/0/1 • Motion passes • Results in the ad hoc (Y/N/A): 10/0/0 Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  37. Comment Resolution from Ad Hoc and Telecon • Motion: • Move to adopt the resolutions depicted by document 11-19-702r2 for CIDs 2164, 2169, 2170, 2171, 2172, 2173 and 2174, instruct the technical editor to incorporate it in the P802.11az draft and grant the editor editorial license. • Moved: Assaf Kasher • Second: Ganesh Venkatesan • Results (Y/N/A): 20/0/4 • Motion passes • Results in the ad hoc (Y/N/A): 10/0/0 Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  38. Comment Resolution from Ad Hoc and Telecon • Motion: • Move to adopt the resolutions depicted by document 11-19-701r1 for CIDs 1343, 1474, 2175, 2176, 2180, 2181, 2182, 2183, 2184 and 2185, instruct the technical editor to incorporate it in the P802.11az draft and grant the editor editorial license. • Moved: Jerome Henry • Second: Yongho Seok • Results (Y/N/A): 21/0/2 • Motion passes • Results in the ad hoc (Y/N/A): 13/0/0 Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  39. Comment Resolution from Ad Hoc and Telecon • Motion • Move to adopt the resolutions depicted by document 11-19-697r2 for CIDs 1336, 1977, 1170, 1567, and 1568, instruct the technical editor to incorporate it in the P802.11az draft and grant the editor editorial license. • Moved: Dibakar Das • Second: Chittabrata Ghosh • Results (Y/N/A): 21/0/2 • Motion passes • Results in the ad hoc (Y/N/A): 16/0/0 Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  40. Comment Resolution from Ad Hoc and Telecon • Motion • Move to adopt the resolution depicted by document 11-19-701r2 for CID 1343, instruct the technical editor to incorporate it in the P802.11az draft and grant the editor editorial license. • Moved: Ganesh Venkatesan • Second: Manish Kumar • Results (Y/N/A): 20/0/4 • Motion passes • Results in the ad hoc (Y/N/A): 13/0/0 Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  41. Comment Resolution from Ad Hoc and Telecon • Motion • Move to adopt the resolution depicted by document 11-19-702r3 for CID 1977, instruct the technical editor to incorporate it in the P802.11az draft and grant the editor editorial license. • Moved: Manish Kumar • Second: Yongho Seok • Results (Y/N/A): 17/0/4 • Motion passes • Results in the ad hoc (Y/N/A): 12/0/0 Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  42. Comment Resolution from Ad Hoc and Telecon • Motion • Move to adopt the resolution depicted by document 11-19-676r1 for CIDs 1707, 1116, 1583, 1395, 1397 and 1424, instruct the technical editor to incorporate it in the P802.11az draft and grant the editor editorial license. • Moved: Assaf Kasher • Second: Dibakar Das • Results (Y/N/A): 21/0/4 • Motion passes • Results in the ad hoc (Y/N/A): 13/0/1 Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  43. Comment Resolution from Ad Hoc and Telecon • Motion • Move to adopt the resolution depicted by document 11-19-602r1 for CIDs • 2026, 2203, 2027, 2415, 2206, 2210, 1260, 1828, 1831, 1830, 1832, 1833, 1582, 2208 and 2219, instruct the technical editor to incorporate it in the P802.11az draft and grant the editor editorial license. • Moved: Yongho Seok • Second: Ganesh Venkatesan • Results (Y/N/A): 21/0/3 • Motion passes • Results in the ad hoc (Y/N/A): 11/0/0 Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  44. CR Submission 11-19-331 (to postpone) – March Meeting • Motion • Motion to postpone the amended motion on the floor to first TGaz meeting slot during the IEEE May 2019 meeting. • Moved: Chitto Ghosh • Second: Ali Raissinia • Results (Y/N/A): 26/25/2 • Motion passes. Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  45. CR Submission 11-19-331 (amended) • Motion • Resolve CID 2295 as, ‘Revised. • Incorporate the changes depicted by document 11-19-331r3 in the 802.11az draft amendment text and grant editorial rights to the technical editor.’ • Moved: Chris Hartman • Second: Ganesh Venkatesan • Results (Y/N/A): 15/19/2 • Motion fails. Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  46. CID Assignment Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  47. CR Submission 11-19-704 • Strawpoll • We support moving the secured LTF parameters element from the Fine Timing Measurement Request and Fine Timing Measurement frames to the Ranging Parameters element. • Results (Y/N/A):14/0/3 Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  48. Reminder to do attendance Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  49. Recess Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

  50. Meeting Slot # 2 discussion items • Call Meeting to Order (1 min) • Patent Policy and Logistics (9 min) • Agenda setting and presentation ordering for this meeting slot (5 min) • Review and consider editorial comment resolution (15min) • Review comment assignment and call for volunteers (20min) • Review submissions per presentation ordering(as time permits) Jonathan Segev, Intel corporation

More Related