1 / 36

Towards a collective impact initiative for children?

Towards a collective impact initiative for children?. Ced Simpson Chair Action for Children & Youth Aotearoa February 2012. Some problems are simply too complex to solve with any single approach ‘Nothing will work, but everything might’ Clay Shirky.

gavril
Download Presentation

Towards a collective impact initiative for children?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Towards a collective impact initiative for children? Ced Simpson Chair Action for Children & Youth Aotearoa February 2012

  2. Some problems are simply too complex to solve with any single approach ‘Nothing will work, but everything might’ Clay Shirky

  3. The social sector has 1.4 million nonprofit organizations, most of which work independently, and tens of thousands of government agencies which are notoriously inward-looking. When it comes to solving social problems, society often behaves like a drowning man whose arms and legs thrash about wildly in the water. We expend a great deal of energy, but because we don’t work together efficiently, we don’t necessarily move forward. David Bornstein (2011) Is this also true of New Zealand,albeit on a smaller scale?

  4. ‘Large-scale social change requires broad cross-sector coordination, yet the social sector remains focused on the isolated intervention of individual organizations.’ John Kania & Mark Kramer (2011)

  5. Most funders, faced with the task of choosing a few grantees from many applicants, try to ascertain which organizations make the greatest contribution toward solving a social problem. Grantees, in turn, compete to be chosen by emphasizing how their individual activities produce the greatest effect. Each organization is judged on its own potential to achieve impact, independent of the numerous other organizations that may also influence the issue. And when a grantee is asked to evaluate the impact of its work, every attempt is made to isolate that grantee’s individual influence from all other variables. In short, the nonprofit sector most frequently operates using an approach that we call isolated impact. John Kania & Mark Kramer (2011)

  6. Problem • Single-provider/single-programme solutions are often insufficient for complex problems • Even a range of good programmes, when not aligned, will not be as effective as a coherent collective effort • Social capital can be lost when ‘willing workers’ are discarded because their ‘underperforming’ programmes are ditched

  7. ‘collective impact’ initiatives A disciplined effort to bring together dozens or even hundreds of organizations in a city (or field) to establish a common vision, adopt a shared set of measurable goals and pursue evidence-based actions that reinforce one another’s work and further those goals. • David Bornstein (2011)

  8. Needed? A collective impact initiative to deliver results

  9. US examples

  10. A US example

  11. Communication of the challenge

  12. Communication of the challenge

  13. Communication of the challenge

  14. Communication of the challenge

  15. Communication of the challenge

  16. Communication of the challenge The insulated pipeline

  17. approach • Broad partnerships • A common agenda & shared measurement systems • A common framework: goals, language, measures • Mutually reinforcing actions • Continuous communication • Website & updates, workshops, webinars • Backbone support organizations

  18. 5 conditions for success • a common agenda • shared measurement systems • mutually reinforcing activities • continuous communication • backbone support organizations John Kania & Mark Kramer (2011)

  19. Broad partnerships

  20. Broad partnerships

  21. Ready by 21 National Partnership Founder & Managing Partner Signature Partner • Broad partnerships

  22. A clear strategy

  23. A clear strategy The Pipeline The Building Blocks The Readiness Target The Big Picture Ready Communities Ready Leaders Ready Youth

  24. A clear strategy Ready by 21 Building Blocks BROADER PARTNERSHIPS BIGGER GOALS BETTER DATA BOLDER STRATEGIES

  25. A common framework

  26. A common framework is used to Describe overall outcomes Map contributionand align effort Encourage results-oriented activities by using common measures

  27. Some core activities • Communicating the challenge in simple, compelling, repetitive ways • Communicating the strategy in simple, compelling, repetitive ways • Mapping contributions to agreed outcomes & assessing degree of success using standard tools

  28. The national backbone support organisations for Ready By 21 are (the ‘managing partner’) a key ‘signature partner’ (United Way), ‘mobilization partners’ and ‘technical partners’

  29. Reasons for success? • Fit all the success criteria for ‘collective impact initiatives’ • Instigated in civil society, not by a particular government

  30. Proposal: A collective impact initiative based on Ready By 21-like methodology + the human rights framework

  31. Why use the human rights framework? • It gives emphasis to the moral/legal imperative Action for children is not just another priority; we have moral and legal obligations to respect, protect and fulfil the human rights of children

  32. Why use the human rights framework? 2. Provides a broadly-agreed accountability framework for human and societal development, applying to all actors New Zealand has voluntarily entered into legally-binding commitments to our children. All agencies, groups and individuals have responsibilities, and the state (and its agents) are accountable through treaty-reporting and other systems

  33. Why use the human rights framework? 3. A common framework for cross-disciplinary/ sector collaboration, anchored in something deeper that professional ethics & policy of the day Different frameworks used by different professionals, sectors and agencies can be a stumbling block to shared understanding, aligned effort and collaboration, and effectiveness.

  34. Why use the human rights framework? 4. Includes functional principles such as non-discrimination, participation & empowerment, responsibility Established human rights principles reflect effective working principles

  35. For more information... David Bornstein (2011) ‘The Power of Partnerships’ The New York Times, 10 March 2011. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/10/the-power-of-partnerships/ John Kania, & Mark Kramer. (2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, (Winter 2011). http://www.ssireview.org/images/articles/2011_WI_Feature_Kania.pdf http://www.readyby21.org ced.simpson@article28.org.nz

More Related