1 / 49

Fire Dynamics II

Fire Dynamics II. Lecture # 9 Room-fire Dynamics Jim Mehaffey 82.583. Room-fire Dynamics Outline Introduction Fire development: experimental findings Impact of ventilation, boundary type and fuel load Fire growth: combustible linings

gavrila
Download Presentation

Fire Dynamics II

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fire Dynamics II Lecture # 9 Room-fire Dynamics Jim Mehaffey 82.583 Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  2. Room-fire Dynamics Outline • Introduction • Fire development: experimental findings • Impact of ventilation, boundary type and fuel load • Fire growth: combustible linings • Characterize flashover: Transition from burning of one or a few objects to full room involvement Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  3. Introduction Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  4. Upper Layer Temperature During an Enclosure Fire Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  5. Contribution of Room Linings to Fire Growth • First item ignited may be combustible room linings rather than contents • Fire spreads up the wall (or corner) and spreads along upper part of walls (and under the ceiling if also combustible): wind-aided spread • A hot upper layer is generated which radiates energy to portions of the upper wall not yet burning • Opposed flow flame-spread increases rate of heat release and temperature of upper layer which, in turn, causes faster flame spread • Upper layer may become hot enough for flashover Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  6. Flashover • Transition from burning of one or a few objects to full room involvement Statistics • In non-sprinklered residential buildings 22 - 25% of fires proceed to flashover Room Size • For small rooms (~100 m3) important to determine when (if) flashover occurs (life safety) • For large rooms (~1,000 m3) time to flashover can be long, but a localized pre-flashover fire may be sufficiently severe to cause local structural damage Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  7. Flashover Criteria • Flashover has been defined as occurring when: 1. Fire appears (visually) to undergo rapid transition from localised burning to full-room involvement 2. Crumbled paper placed on floor is ignited 3. Flames emerge from the opening 4. Hot layer temperature reaches 500-600°C 5. Radiant heat flux at floor reaches 20 kW m-2 • Experimental studies have employed criteria 1 to 5 • Theoretical studies employ criteria 4 & 5 Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  8. Experiments: Mehaffey & Harmathy, 1985 • 32 room fire experiments • Fuel: wooden cribs • Fuel load: simulated hotel & office rooms • Room Dimensions • Floor: 2.4 m x 3.6 m • Ceiling height: 2.4 m • Ventilation opening • Open throughout test • Purpose of experiments • Assess thermal response of room boundaries exposed to post-flashover fires Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  9. Impact of boundary (thermal properties) Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  10. Impact of boundary (thermal properties) • Fuel: wooden cribs: 15 kg m-2 (hotel) • Window: area = 9% area of floor • b =0.7 m; h =1.2 m; = 0.92 m5/2 • Post-flashover fire: ventilation controlled • rate of heat release = 970 kW ~ 1 MW • . . . . “Standard fire” CAN4-S101 (ASTM E119) Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  11. Impact of size of openings Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  12. Impact of size of openings • Fuel: wooden cribs: 27 kg m-2 (office) • Thermal inertia of room boundaries • = 666 J m-2 s-1/2 K-1 • kc = 0.444 kJ2 m-4 s-1 K-2 • Post-flashover fire: ventilation controlled • . . . . “Standard fire” CAN4-S101 (ASTM E119) Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  13. Experimental Results: Post-flashover Fires (SFPE Handbook) • Floor area = 29 m2 • Fuel load: wooden cribs • First two tests: Fuel-surface controlled • Last three tests: Ventilation controlled Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  14. Experimental Results: Post-flashover Fires (1) • Largest single loss: Note % lost  as vent area  • Significant loss: Note % lost  as vent area  • Small loss: Note % lost  as vent area  Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  15. Pitt Meadows, B.C. - Video October 19-24, 1996 • 1-storey wood-frame apartment building to be demolished • Local fire departments & IAAI plan full-scale fire tests & training program • UBC / Forintek invited to monitor tests • Video - visual display of flashover - role of ventilation in flashover Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  16. Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  17. Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  18. Maximum Possible Heat Release Rate • One pane open: b = 0.6 m and h = 1.33 m • Window broken: b = 2.7 m and h = 1.33 m Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  19. Pitt Meadows, B.C. - Video October 19-24, 1996 • One window pane open at beginning of test • Appears flashover will not occur as not enough ventilation (air supply) • Firefighters break rest of window glazing • Flashover occurs quickly thereafter Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  20. Temperature Profile in Living Room Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  21. Temperature Profile in Bedroom Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  22. Room Fire Test - Apparatus • ISO 9705 “Fire tests: Full scale room fire tests for surface products” • Contribution of room linings to fire growth (flashover) Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  23. Room Fire Test - Procedure • Line walls and ceiling with product • Burner in back corner • First 10 min: = 100 kW (large wastepaper basket) • Last 10 min: = 300 kW (small upholstered chair) • Observe time to flashover • Room experiences flashover when  1,000 kW Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  24. Room Fire Test - Results Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  25. CAN/ULC- S102: Red Oak and Plywood • At (red oak) = 43.0 m min  FSR (red oak) = 100 • At (plywood) = 47.2 m min  FSR (plywood) = 135 Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  26. CAN/ULC-S102: Gypsum Board • At (gypsum board) = A1 + A2 = 8.0 m min  FSR (gypsum board) = 15 Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  27. CAN/ULC- S102: Polyurethane Foam Insulation • FSR (PU foam insulation) = 427 (d/t) or 74 (At) Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  28. Room Fire Test - Video • Test follows ISO 9705 • Walls & ceiling: wooden panelling • Time to flashover  3:00 min Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  29. Simulation of Rhode Island Fire • NFSA = National Fire Sprinkler Association • Simulate the stage area • dimensions and layout approximately replicated • Foamed plastic acoustic insulation glued to plywood on wall and ceiling • propylene oxide polyol (not PU foam insulation?) • thickness = 75 mm (3”) • density = 16 - 20 kg m-3 (1-1.25 lb ft-3) • Ignition simulated ignition from pyrotechnics • Would sprinklers have helped? Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  30. Simulation of Rhode Island Fire - Video • Demonstrates rapid ignition and flame spread over exposed foamed plastic insulation Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  31. Kemano: Fire in Basement Recreation Room • Room dimensions: 3.25 m x 3.44 m x 2.2 m (height) • Walls: 2 gypsum board // 2 (6 mm) wood panelling • Ceiling: gypsum board • Floor: carpet over concrete • Furnishings: couch / coffee table / TV on wood desk • Ventilation: no window / hollow-core wood door closed Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  32. Temperatures in Basement Fire • Temperature predictions from Lecture 3 for leaky enclosures (based on oxygen depletion): • For a heat loss fraction 1= 0.9, Tg,lim = 120 K • For a heat loss fraction 1= 0.6, Tg,lim = 480 K • 1 = 0.6 appropriate for spaces with smooth ceilings & large ceiling area to height ratios • 1 = 0.9 appropriate for spaces with irregular ceiling shapes, small ceiling area to height ratios & where fires are located against walls Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  33. Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  34. Suppression At what rate (litre/min) must water be applied to absorb the heat being released by a fire? • Assume water starts as liquid droplets at 20°C. • Account for the energy required to heat the droplets to 100°C and then vaporize them to steam at 100°C. • Assume density of water is 1000 kg/m3, specific heat in the range 20-100°C is 4.182 x 103 J/(kg °C) and heat of vaporization is 2.26 x 106 J/kg. Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  35. Suppression • Heat absorbed as 1 kg of water heated from 20C  100C  steam is H = 4.182 x 103 J / (kg C) x 80C + 2.26 x 106 J/kg  H = 2.595 x 103 kJ kg-1 • Density of water is 1,000 kg m-3 = 1 kg / litre  H = 2.595 x 103 kJ litre-1 • Define rate of heat release of fire = • Define efficiency of application of water to fire as  < 1 Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  36. Suppression • Divide heat release rate by  times heat absorbed per kg of water that is vaporized to arrive at rate water must be applied in units of kg s-1 • Required rate of application of water (litre s-1) • Assume  = 1/2 and remember 60 s = 1 min • Required rate of application (litre min-1) Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  37. Suppression • For 1,000 kW fire, rate water must be applied is 120 x 1,000 / 2.595 x 103 = 46 litre min-1 • For 6,200 kW fire, rate water must be applied is 120 x 6,200 / 2.595 x 103 = 285 litre min-1 1 US gal = 3.785 litres or 1 litre = 0.264 US gal Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  38. Factors Contributing to Fire Growth (Pre-flashover Fires) • Flammability of room contents: Rate of heat release • Distribution of combustibles (room contents) • Flammability of room linings: propensity for flame spread / rate of heat release • Thermal properties of room linings • Supply of air: size and status of potential openings • Size and shape of room Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  39. Factors Contributing to Fire Severity (Post-flashover Fires) • Flammability: contents & linings: Rate of heat release • Quantity of combustibles • Thermal properties of room linings • Supply of air: size of unprotected openings • Size and shape of room Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  40. Pre-flashover Fires Threats: * life safety in room (& elsewhere) threatened by toxicity, heat & reduced visibility * property in room (& elsewhere) threatened by smoke deposition (corrosivity) & heat * localised structural damage Design Strategies: * inhibit early fire growth * delay or prevent flashover * foster evacuation from room / building Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  41. Pre-flashover Fires Design Options: * limit flammability of contents & linings * limit supply of fresh air * provide early automatic suppression * provide early detection & alarm * limit travel distances & provide adequate exits from room / building Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  42. Post-flashover Fires Threats: * life safety in rest of building threatened by toxicity, heat & reduced visibility * property in rest of building threatened by smoke deposition (corrosivity) & heat * fire spread to other rooms or buildings * structural damage Design Strategies: * delay or prevent fire spread * delay or prevent structural damage * foster evacuation from building * control movement of smoke Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  43. Post-flashover Fires Design Options: * provide compartmentation * ensure adequate spatial separations * ensure structural sufficiency * limit quantity of combustibles * provide automatic suppression * provide adequate means of egress * provide adequate smoke control Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  44. Relative roles of contents and linings in fire dynamics as reflected in fire loss statistics Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  45. Fire Loss Statistics (1) 1982-1996 Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  46. Upholstered Furniture: Fire Loss Statistics 1982-1996 (1) Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  47. Fire Loss Statistics Upholstered Furniture 1982-1996 (1) Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  48. Fire Loss Statistics Upholstered Furniture 1982-1996 (1) Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

  49. References 1. K.D. Rohr, “Custom Analysis: Examining Fires in Selected Residential Properties”, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, August 1998. Carleton University, 82.583, Fire Dynamics II, Winter 2003, Lecture # 9

More Related