510 likes | 1.2k Views
. ????????? ??? ?????? ??????? ??? ??????????? ?????? ?????. ????????? ????? 9% ???? ?????? ?????? ??????????? ?-21% ????????.. Rhinosinusitis. Acute rhinosinusitisSubacute rhinosinusitisChronic rhinosinusitisRecurrent ARSAcute rhinosinusitis superimposed on CRS . Acute rhinosinusitis.
E N D
1. Acute & Chronic Sinusitis ?????? ????
2. ????????? ??? ?????? ??????? ??? ??????????? ?????? ?????.
????????? ????? 9% ???? ?????? ?????? ??????????? ?-21% ????????.
??? ?????? ?-2002 ????"???? ?????? ?-2002 ????"?
3. Rhinosinusitis Acute rhinosinusitis
Subacute rhinosinusitis
Chronic rhinosinusitis
Recurrent ARS
Acute rhinosinusitis superimposed on CRS
????? ?? ????????????? ??? ??????, ?????? ????? ?? ????????????? ??? ??????, ??????
4. Acute rhinosinusitis Acute sinusitis 7-21 days (7 days viral illness)
Spontaneous resolution of ARS -40%
The most common pathogens: strep pneumonia-30%,
non typeabale hemophilus infl.-20%, moraxella catarrhalis.(20% in children)
Staph aureus- 30%
Anaerobes- rare
?????? ??? ????? ???? ?? 30 ??? ?????? ??? ????? ???? ?? 30 ???
5. Recurrent ARS Episodes of bacterial infection of the paranasal sinuses, each lasting less than 30 days and separated by intervals of at least 10 days during which the patient is asymptomatic. RECURRENT ARS ???? ??? ?? ????????? ????? ?????? ?? 30 ??? ?? ????? ?????? ??? ????? ??? ??????? ???? ????? 10 ????. ???? ???? ??? ?? ????? ??????????. RECURRENT ARS ???? ??? ?? ????????? ????? ?????? ?? 30 ??? ?? ????? ?????? ??? ????? ??? ??????? ???? ????? 10 ????. ???? ???? ??? ?? ????? ??????????.
6. Subacute sinusitis Subacute RS:3W-3months
The same pathogens as in ARS
?????? ????? ????? ???? ??? 30-9- ??? . ?????? ????? ????? ???? ??? 30-9- ??? .
7. Chronic rhinosinusitis Beyond 3 months
Bacteria are as in ARS, but
More non-typeable H Influezae
More staph aureus, anaerobic bacteria, gram- Negative, pseudomonase aeruginosa
Polymicrobials with resistant organism
Culture recommended
????? ??????? ?? ???????? ??? ???????? ??????? ???? ?? ???? ????? ?? ??????? ????? ??????? ??????.
?????? ????? ?????? ?????? ???.
????? ??????? ?? ???????? ??? ???????? ??????? ???? ?? ???? ????? ?? ??????? ????? ??????? ??????.
?????? ????? ?????? ?????? ???.
8. Acute bacterial sinusitis superimposed on chronic sinusitis Patients with residual respiratory symptoms develop new respiratory symptoms. When treated with antimicrobials, these new symptoms resolve, but the underlying residual symptoms do not.
9. Major & Minor signs and symptoms in diagnosis of Chronic RS Majors:
Facial pain/pressure
Nasal congestion/fullness
N. obstruction/blockage
N. discharge/purulence
Hyposmia/ anosmia
Purulent rhinitis
Fever (acute sinusitis only)
Minors:
Headache
Fever
Halitosis
Fatigue
Dental pain
Cough
Ear pain/ pressure/fulln
10. Clinical Diagnosis of rhinosinusitis 2 or more major factors
1 major & 2 minor factors
Or Purulence on examination
Duration of symptoms > 10 days or worsen after 5-7 days
11. Predisposing factors URI
Allergy
Trauma
Dental infection
Environmental Pollutants
GERD
Cystic Fibrosis
12. Facial pain on percussion or palpation, sedimentation rate and white blood count have little diagnostic value.
?????? ????? ???? ??????????:
?????? ????? DOUBLE SICKNENING
????????? ??????? ??????? ???? ???????????????? ????? ???? ??????????:
?????? ????? DOUBLE SICKNENING
????????? ??????? ??????? ???? ??????????
13. The gold standard for the diagnosis of acute bacterial sinusitis is the recovery of bacteria in high density (>10 colony-forming units/mL) from the cavity of a paranasal sinus
14. Rhinosinusitis definitions for patient care ????? ?CRS ?? ????? ??? ????? ????
????? ?CRS ?? ????? ??? ????? ????
15. ?-AFRS ??????? ???????????? ??? IgE ?????? ????? ?? ?? ??????? ??????
???? ????? ??? ?? ????? ??? ???? ???? ??????. ?-AFRS ??????? ???????????? ??? IgE ?????? ????? ?? ?? ??????? ??????
???? ????? ??? ?? ????? ??? ???? ???? ??????.
16. Dose the patient have 2 or more major factors ...? Yes:
Amoxicillin
Or Bactrim
No:
Treat symptomatically
Saline irrigation
Oral decongestant
Antihistamine (allergy)
Reevaluate in 10 days
18. Severe sinusitis with suspected orbital or intracranial complications –cefuroxime or ceftriaxone
The best in crs treat according to culture
For crs treat 3 weeks, while improvement within 3-5 days
3-6 weeks prophylaxis once daily therapy for patients with rapid recurrence??
19. Antimicrobial treatment guidelines 1. mild symptoms, not received antibiotics within 4-6w.
2. mild disease, who received antibiotics within 4-6w,
or with moderate disease regardless of recent antibiotic exposure, ? guidelines ???? ?? ?????? ?? ????????? ???? ????????:
?????? ????? ?????? ????? ??????? ???????? ??? ?????? ??????.
??? ?? ???? ????? ?????? ??? 72 ???? ???? ????????? guidelines ???? ?? ?????? ?? ????????? ???? ????????:
?????? ????? ?????? ????? ??????? ???????? ??? ?????? ??????.
??? ?? ???? ????? ?????? ??? 72 ???? ???? ????????
20. ???? ?????? ??????????:
???? ?? ???????? ???? ?? ?????? ??? ?????? ?? ???????? ????????
???? ?? ????? ????? ????? ????? ???? ????????
????? ??????? ????, ??? ?????????.
????? ??????? ???? ??????
21. ????? ???????? ???????????? ???????? ??????? ??????? ????? ? 90-92% ????: fluoroquinolones ??? levofloxacin ?- moxifloxacin.
ceftriaxone ,augmentin
?????? ?? 83-88%: cefixime high dose amoxicillin, cefpodoxime proxile, cefuroxime axetil, cefdinir TMP/SMX
?????? ?? 77-81%:docxycyline, clindamycin,
azitromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin
?????? ?? 65-66%: cefaclor,loracarbef ??????????? ?????? ????- 4gr/day
Cefixime ???? ???????? ?????????? ????????
???? ?????? ??????? ?????? ?? ????? ?????? ?? ARS ???? 62% ??????????? ?????? ????- 4gr/day
Cefixime ???? ???????? ?????????? ????????
???? ?????? ??????? ?????? ?? ????? ?????? ?? ARS ???? 62%
22. ????? ?????? 91-92% : ceftriaxone, augmentin
82-87%: amoxicillin, cefpodoxime proxetil, cefixime, cefuroxime axetil,cefdinir,TMP/SMX
78-80%: clindamycin, cefprozil, azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin
67-68% : cefaclor ???????? ?????? ???? ?? 90mg/k/day ??????? 45mg/k/day
???? ?????? ?? ARS ?????? ???????? ???? 63% ???????? ?????? ???? ?? 90mg/k/day ??????? 45mg/k/day
???? ?????? ?? ARS ?????? ???????? ???? 63%
23. ??????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ?? ???? ??? Augmentin, amoxicillin, cefpodoxime proxetil, cefuroxime axetil, or cefdinir
For b-lactam allergies patients: TMP/SMX, doxycilline, azithromycin, clarithromycin,erythromycin
Failure after 72h: reevaluation or switch to alternate antimicrobial therapy
24. ?????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ?? ???? ??? ?????? ???? Respiratory flouroquinolones, augmentin (4g/day),ceftriaxone (1-2 g/day 5 days), combination of g+ and g-
Failure after 72h: switch to alternate antimicrobial therapy, or reevaluation
CT scan, endoscopy, sinus aspiration and culture ?????? ?4-6 ??????? ???????? ???????????? ?? ??????? ?? ???? ???????
Respiratory quinolones :gatifloxacin, levofloxacin,moxifloxacin
????? ?????? ??? ????? ???? ?????: ??????????? ?????? ???? ?? ?????????? ???????? ?? ??????????? ?????? ???? ??????????? ????????. ?? ?????? ???????? ?? ???? ?????? ????? ??? ???? ??? ???? ?-10-14 ??? ??? ????? ???????? ???????. ??? ?? ?? ????? ?????????? ???????
????? ?????? ???????? ????? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ???? ????? ???? ??? ???? ?????????????????? ?4-6 ??????? ???????? ???????????? ?? ??????? ?? ???? ???????
Respiratory quinolones :gatifloxacin, levofloxacin,moxifloxacin
????? ?????? ??? ????? ???? ?????: ??????????? ?????? ???? ?? ?????????? ???????? ?? ??????????? ?????? ???? ??????????? ????????. ?? ?????? ???????? ?? ???? ?????? ????? ??? ???? ??? ???? ?-10-14 ??? ??? ????? ???????? ???????. ??? ?? ?? ????? ?????????? ???????
????? ?????? ???????? ????? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ???? ????? ???? ??? ???? ????????????
25. ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?? ???? ??? Augmentin (90mg/k/day), amocixillin (90 mg/k/day), cefpodoxime proxetil, cefuroxime axetil, or cefdinir
Type I hypersensitivity to b-lactams patients: TMP/SMX, azithromycin, clarithromycin or erythromycin.
Make differentiate an immediate hypersensitivity from other side effects
Failure after 72 h ??? ????? ????? ?????? ????????? ?-4-6 ?????? ???????.
?????? ????? ?? ??????? ???? ???? ???????????? ?? ?????? ?????? ???? ??????? ??????? ?? ARS ??????? ???? ???? ???? 20-25%.
?????? ??? ?????? ??? ??????? ????? ????? ???? ???????.
????? ?? ?????? ??? ???? ????? ?????? ?:???????????, ?????? ??????? ?? ??????? ?????. ????? ?? ?????? ????? ??????? ????? ?????? ????? ??? ???? ?????? ??? ?? ???. ??? ????? ????? ?????? ????????? ?-4-6 ?????? ???????.
?????? ????? ?? ??????? ???? ???? ???????????? ?? ?????? ?????? ???? ??????? ??????? ?? ARS ??????? ???? ???? ???? 20-25%.
?????? ??? ?????? ??? ??????? ????? ????? ???? ???????.
????? ?? ?????? ??? ???? ????? ?????? ?:???????????, ?????? ??????? ?? ??????? ?????. ????? ?? ?????? ????? ??????? ????? ?????? ????? ??? ???? ?????? ??? ?? ???.
26. ?????? ?????? ?????? ?? ???? ??? (????? ???????) ?? ???? ??????? Augmentin(90mg/k/day), cefpodoxime proxetil, cefuroxime axetil or cefdinir.
Beta lactams allergic patients: TMP/SMX, azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin
Clindamycin for s pneumoniae
Ceftriaxone (5 days, parenteral), or combination therapy for G+ and G-
Clindamycin or amocixillin and cefixime
Clindamycin or amoxicillin and rifampin ????? ?????? ?-4-6 ?????? ???????? ????????????. ????? ?????? ?-4-6 ?????? ???????? ????????????.
27. New insights into the role of bacteria in CRS Bacterial superantigens-exotoxins that are able to activate T lymphocytes
Pathogenesis of nasal polyposis- superantigens from S aureus ????????????? ??????? ???????????? ????? ??? ??????? ?? ???????? ??????? 30% ?T ????????? ?????? ????????? ????????, ??? ??????? ???? ?-0.01% ??-T ?????????.
??? ?? ????????????? ?????? ????? ????????? ??????, ?????? ?????? ??????? ???? ????????????, ???? ????? ??????? ?? IGE ????????????? ??????? ???????????? ????? ??? ??????? ?? ???????? ??????? 30% ?T ????????? ?????? ????????? ????????, ??? ??????? ???? ?-0.01% ??-T ?????????.
??? ?? ????????????? ?????? ????? ????????? ??????, ?????? ?????? ??????? ???? ????????????, ???? ????? ??????? ?? IGE
28. Biofilms-a artificial or damaged biologic surface that formed communicating organization of microorganisms surrounded by a glycocalys
Biofilms is relatively impervious to antibiotics and is never eradicated
Mechanical debridement- the only way to resolve biofilms
??????????? ????? ???????? ???? ?????? ????? ???????? ????? ?? HOST ????????? ????????????????.
???????? ????? ????? ???? ?? ????? ??????? ???? ?????? ?CRS , ??? ?????? ?????? ??? ????? ?? ????? ?? ?????? ?????? ???????, ????? ????????? ??? ????? ????????? ??????? ?? ????? ?????? ??????????.
????? ????????? ???? ?????? ????????? ???????? ?????? ???? ????? ????? , ??? ????? ?????? ???? ?????? ?? ???? ????? ????????? ???????? ?????? . ??????????? ????? ???????? ???? ?????? ????? ???????? ????? ?? HOST ????????? ????????????????.
???????? ????? ????? ???? ?? ????? ??????? ???? ?????? ?CRS , ??? ?????? ?????? ??? ????? ?? ????? ?? ?????? ?????? ???????, ????? ????????? ??? ????? ????????? ??????? ?? ????? ?????? ??????????.
????? ????????? ???? ?????? ????????? ???????? ?????? ???? ????? ????? , ??? ????? ?????? ???? ?????? ?? ???? ????? ????????? ???????? ?????? .
29. Osteitis: the role of the bone Osteomyelitis can be seen at a distance from the primary infection
Inflammatory bone changes were noted on contralateral side in 52% of the animals
The changes in the involved bone can explain why CRS is relatively resistant to medical therapy. ?? ?? ?? ???? ??????? ???? ?? ????? ?? CRS . ????? ????????????????? ??? ????? ???????. ?? ?? ?? ???? ??????? ???? ?? ????? ?? CRS . ????? ????????????????? ??? ????? ???????.
30. Failed CRS To sinus surgery or systemic steroid/antibiotics
Macrolid therapy (long term, low dose) effective ????? ?????? ?????????? ?????? ??????.
????? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ????
?? ????? ????? ????? ????? ??????????? ?? ?????????? ?? ??????? NO ?????.????? ?????? ?????????? ?????? ??????.
????? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ????
?? ????? ????? ????? ????? ??????????? ?? ?????????? ?? ??????? NO ?????.
31. CRS 78 had criteria to CRS
37- CT findings: positive
41- CT findings: negative
35: endoscopy negative & CT negative
20: endoscopy negative & CT positive
55: endoscopy negative ?-78 ??? ????????? ??????? ???????? ?????????? ??????. ????? ????? ???? ???????????? ????? ???.
?? ?????? ???? ?? ??????? ?????? ?? ????? ?? ??????? ????, ???? ??????? ?? ????. ?-78 ??? ????????? ??????? ???????? ?????????? ??????. ????? ????? ???? ???????????? ????? ???.
?? ?????? ???? ?? ??????? ?????? ?? ????? ?? ??????? ????, ???? ??????? ?? ????.
32. Radiology & clinical exam Correlated with a Sensitivity of 75%
And specificity of 84%
Endoscopy correlated poorly with sinus disease and not predictive
????? ???????: ???? ????? ?? ???? ???????, ??????? ?? ????? ????? ??????????? ???? ????? ???? ?? ????????? ????? .
??? ?? ?? ?????????? ???? ?????? , ??? ???? ?????. ????? ???????: ???? ????? ?? ???? ???????, ??????? ?? ????? ????? ??????????? ???? ????? ???? ?? ????????? ????? .
??? ?? ?? ?????????? ???? ?????? , ??? ???? ?????.
34. Endoscopy/ct findings/clinical Easy to diagnose CRS by endoscopy alone when nasal polyps, purulence, or fungus is observed,
when absent, establishing the diagnosis may be more difficult
45% of patients with clinical CRS were both endoscopically and radiographically negative.
Stankiewicz and Chow. Otolaryngol head neck surg 2002
35. Endoscopy/ct findings/clinical Negative endoscopy alone is insufficient to rule out sinusitis.
26% of patients who were negative on endoscopy had positive CT – this would suggest that if endoscopy is negative most of the time the ct will be also negative, even with a positive history.
36. ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? (?????? URI) ????? ???? ???? ?? ????? ????? ??? 10 ????
????? ???? ?????? ???????? ?? ????????? ?? VIRAL URI ??? ?????? ???? 10 ???? ?? ?????? ???? 5-7 ????.
The diagnosis of acute bacterial sinusitis is based on clinical criteria in children who present with upper respiratory symptoms that are either persistent or severe
37. ?????? Persistent symptoms are those that last longer than 10 to 14, but less than 30, days. Such symptoms include nasal or postnasal discharge (of any quality), daytime cough (which may be worse at night), or both.
38. ?????? Severe symptoms include a temperature of at least 102°F (39oC) and purulent nasal discharge present concurrently for at least 3 to 4 consecutive days in a child who seems ill. The child who seems toxic should be hospitalized and is not considered in this algorithm.
39. children ??????? ???????? ?????? ????? ????: ?????????? ????????? ?????? ??????. ???????? ???? 5 ????????? ????? ??????? 7-8 ????.
????? ?? ??? 1 ??? ?????? ???? ??????? ???? ???? ????? ??????? ?guide LINES -??????? ???????? ?????? ????? ????: ?????????? ????????? ?????? ??????. ???????? ???? 5 ????????? ????? ??????? 7-8 ????.
????? ?? ??? 1 ??? ?????? ???? ??????? ???? ???? ????? ??????? ?guide LINES -
40. ARS in children Diagnosis in children based on clinical criteria
Radiology is only for complications, persistent or recurrent sinusitis
For prevention there is no prophylactic antimicrobial treatment, ancillary therapies, complementary/alternative medicine ??????????? ?????? ???? ????????? ??????? ??????? ?? ???? ?? ???? ????? ?????????????????? ?????? ???? ????????? ??????? ??????? ?? ???? ?? ???? ????? ???????
41. Surgical management of crs in children 5-8 events of colds/year
5%-13% will complicate by acute RS
Most of children with RS respond to medical treatment
Today surgery consist of sinus lavage, ESS, adenoidectomy
42. Goal of surgery Surgery is for control of symptoms, better quality of life and to prevent complications
Indications to surgery are not uniform between OL and P
“cure”-the goal for surgery, but is not the likely end point
Reversible mucosal disease may be possible in the long run, but is unlikely to be realized in the short term
44. Maximal medical management Reflux
Macrolids
Antileukotriens
Irrigations-nasal sprays
Alternative medical approaches
In few children with “end-stage” CRS, I have personally seen much improvement with aggressive medical
management of reflux.
Could it be that earlier treatment may prevent the long-term mucosal inflammation that is not easily reversed?
macrolides have both antimicrobial and antiinflammatory properties
If one believes that CRS is a result of obstruction of mucous flow, it seems logical that decreasing the local
inflammation could be helpful in reducing edema and improving mucous flow.
the use of antileukotrienes has seemed to be effective in reducing the allergic cascade, decreasing the symptoms of allergy [11••].
Saline lavage should debride the nasal cavity of the thick mucous and crusts. It could be effective in delivery of medicines,
Nebulized antibiotics seemed to give longer infection-free periods than standard therapy[13]
The bulb syringe was statistically superior to the nebulizer in all sinus sites and to all alternative delivery systems in the ethmoid
There are few well-controlled studies with these agents, alternative medical approaches,
and of course even fewer for children with CRS.
In few children with “end-stage” CRS, I have personally seen much improvement with aggressive medical
management of reflux.
Could it be that earlier treatment may prevent the long-term mucosal inflammation that is not easily reversed?
macrolides have both antimicrobial and antiinflammatory properties
If one believes that CRS is a result of obstruction of mucous flow, it seems logical that decreasing the local
inflammation could be helpful in reducing edema and improving mucous flow.
the use of antileukotrienes has seemed to be effective in reducing the allergic cascade, decreasing the symptoms of allergy [11••].
Saline lavage should debride the nasal cavity of the thick mucous and crusts. It could be effective in delivery of medicines,
Nebulized antibiotics seemed to give longer infection-free periods than standard therapy[13]
The bulb syringe was statistically superior to the nebulizer in all sinus sites and to all alternative delivery systems in the ethmoid
There are few well-controlled studies with these agents, alternative medical approaches,
and of course even fewer for children with CRS.
45. Surgical management children Biomaterials
Subperiosteal abscess
Older children seemed to do better than younger children in general. If the child was older than 6 years, there was an 89% success rate, but the success rate was only
73% in those younger than 6 years. The few children who were operated who were younger than 3 years of age had a 75% chance of needing additional surgery
“Cure,” although the goal for surgery, is not the likely end point. Our hope of reversible mucosal disease may be possible in the long run, but is unlikely to be realized in the short term.
Hyaluronic acid would seem to fit that bill. Merogel was invented for that reason
Older children seemed to do better than younger children in general. If the child was older than 6 years, there was an 89% success rate, but the success rate was only
73% in those younger than 6 years. The few children who were operated who were younger than 3 years of age had a 75% chance of needing additional surgery
“Cure,” although the goal for surgery, is not the likely end point. Our hope of reversible mucosal disease may be possible in the long run, but is unlikely to be realized in the short term.
Hyaluronic acid would seem to fit that bill. Merogel was invented for that reason
46. The surgical site in children There is strong evidence to support the fact that the OMC area is the primary site of involvement of inflammatory sinuses disease.
48. Surgical management in children Role of adenoidectomy:
1. reservoir for pathogenic bacteria
2. interfere with nasal mucociliary clearance
3.better drainage
Overall success of adenoidectomy-50%
Studies show reduction in the number of bacterial pathogens in the nasopharynx after adenoidectomy
49. Fear of surgery? Surgery may cause growth retardation of the midface
Bothwell et al. showed no difference in facial growth of children with CRS who operated compare with children who refused surgery.
50. Surgery Children who fail medical therapy benefit from surgery
Adenoidectomy recommended initially for children 6 years of age (no asthma, low CT score)
ESS and adenoidectomy for children older than 6 (asthma and high CT score)
Ramadan. Laryngoscope.2004
51. Results of surgery children Older children do better than youngest
Old children (>6 y/o)- successes rate is 89% , but younger children (<6 y/o)- successes rate is only 73%
>3 y/o who were operated have 75% chance to be reoperate
52. Antibiotic therapy Amoxicillin -1st choice
In children give high dose 60mg/kg/day
To consider 2nd generation cephalosporin, or erythromycin with sulfonamide ,or high dose penicillin in areas with a high incidence of bacterial antibiotic resistance.
Based on studies showing a 20% incidence of viable bacteria through maxillary sinus tap after 7 days of antibiotic therapy, most authors recommend 10 days of therapy in the manage of acute sinusitis
????? 40 ?? ????? ????. ????? 40 ?? ????? ????.