1 / 29

The All Composite One Piece Bumper

The All Composite One Piece Bumper. by Brian Knouff 3 rd Annual SPE Automotive Composites Conference September 9 – 10, 2003 Troy, MI. Introduction. Delphi Composites Center of Excellence set up to Affordably Integrate Composites into Transportation Industry ~ 1999

gaylec
Download Presentation

The All Composite One Piece Bumper

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The All Composite One Piece Bumper by Brian Knouff 3rd Annual SPE Automotive Composites Conference September 9 – 10, 2003 Troy, MI

  2. Introduction • Delphi Composites Center of Excellence set up to Affordably Integrate Composites into Transportation Industry • ~ 1999 • Stemmed from columns work done in Salt Lake City • Cost penalty realized • Other benefits crucial • Class 8 truck market benefits: • Less road wear and tear • Fewer loads for those vehicles which gross out • Less traffic • Less pollution • Less maintenance for those which cube out • Better mileage

  3. Challenging Sacred Cows • Glass not Stiff Enough to Replace Steel • Carbon Too Expensive • Composites Can’t be Attached • adhesives work in some applications • Composites Display Poor Fatigue Properties • Process Cycle Time Too Long

  4. Strategy • Utilize Advanced Modeling Techniques to Optimize Composite Designs • Work with Government Labs, Universities and Commercial Partners to Investigate Alternative Precursors/Carbonization Techniques • Develop Novel Processes with Emphasis on Reduced Cycle Times • Work with Suppliers to Reduce Material Costs at High Volumes

  5. First Application • Aftermarket Class 8 Bumper

  6. Background • Metal bumpers account for about half of the market

  7. Background • Plastic bumpers make up the balance SMC Thermo Plastic Polyolefin ABS Alloy FRP

  8. Design Requirements • Natural Frequency >50 Hz • Deflect <0.5 inches with 300 lb downward load at end • represents large person stepping on bumper to clean hood, etc… • Deflect <0.5 inches with 50 lb forward load at end • represents hitting small object, windloads, etc… • Aesthetically pleasing with carbon fiber visible • Class A surface • Mass savings > 50%

  9. Design Topology

  10. Design Comparisons

  11. Deflections

  12. Weights (kg)

  13. All Carbon and Ni/Carbon Hybrid Bumpers

  14. GATS Bumper

  15. 2000 GATS Display

  16. Conclusions • Composite bumpers can be designed to replace either steel or plastic bumpers • Composite bumpers can be commercialized in today’s market at high volumes (competitive piece price) • Versus Steel • lighter • increased design flexibility • lower tooling costs • Versus Plastic • stronger • stiffer • fewer parts (1 versus 40) • lower tooling costs

  17. Production Launch

  18. Old Production • Very large volumes • Huge investments in tooling • Every part the same • Part/Plant redesign every 10 years or so

  19. New Production • Low to medium volumes as well as high volumes • Minimal investments in tooling • Parts constantly changing • Plants fluid (modular) and lean • Opportunity for structural polymer composites

  20. Aftermarket Class 8 Bumper Less than 40 lbs. Nf~20 Hz 1 piece construction Charcoal gray or black color No visible fibers on front face Textured, non-painted surface Production Intent

  21. Optimized for Natural Frequency Topology dictated areas of critical mass. Product Design Math-based Optimization Optimize with design responses, variables, constraints, and objectives Grid can be made dynamic Typical design parameters include: thickness fiber type fiber orientation fiber volume fraction shape Part Design

  22. Process Development • Low-cost tooling • not steel or aluminum • Easy preform construction • no spray or robotic tooling • few piece construction • template cutting • switch to more automated process in production • Minimize equipment $ • vacuum infusion versus RTM • Experience showed that stitched fabrics too tight to vacuum infuse • needed to use rollers for GATS bumpers

  23. Texturing CNC Plug

  24. Production Process • Vacuum Infusion • Closed 2-sided mold • No injection pressure • Vacuum at exhaust pulls resin through inlet and through fabric

  25. Precut Preform The pattern is cut from a single sheet of 3WEAVE fabric

  26. Tucking Preform Single layer of 54oz is conformed into the mold

  27. In Service

  28. Micrography • Microscopic analysis displays: • Excellent wetout • Absence of voids • Good fiber distribution • Barrier coat thickness

  29. Today Place several materials into mold Form materials into mold Process materials into mold Remove part Trim and package Ship Future Place net-shape preform into mold Process into part Remove part Ship Make A Part

More Related