160 likes | 245 Views
Fl emish SMP and inspection tool. Brussels , June 17 th 2010 Paul W.Verspoor MBA. Flemish legal situation. Operators: anual ‘VOC document’ Demonstrate compliance SED and some additional ELV’s Send to authorities : if requested Content ‘VOC document’: not specified. The project.
E N D
Flemish SMP and inspection tool Brussels, June 17th 2010 Paul W.Verspoor MBA
Flemishlegalsituation • Operators: anual ‘VOC document’ • Demonstratecompliance SED and someadditionalELV’s • Send to authorities: ifrequested • Content ‘VOC document’: notspecified
The project • Clarifications & Answers to FAQ on SED • Alsoavailable in English • (Google: EsvoccgFrequentlyaskedquestions SED) • Studyexisting VOC documents • Makeinspectionseasier • Idea: Standardise SMP forcertainactivities
Existing VOC documents • Industrystandards & Individual operators • Widely different • Impossible to inspectefficiently • Non paidattention to uncertainties • Project • Guideline ‘VOC document’ for all activities • Inspectionmanual
Guideline VOC document • Comprehensive list of required content • Onlypartsapply in individual cases • Help to find relevant sectionsonly • Questionsthat must beanswered • For everythinkablesituations • Adressesuncertainties • Per SMP item & overall
Inspectionmanual • Three stage approach • Analysis of VOC document • Requireadditionalinformation (ifnecessary) • On site inspection (ifnecessary) • Manual • Guideline+ inspectioninstructions • Every item in guideline
Required Content • Description of the installation and background information • ELV’s and otherrestrictions • Actualemissions • Accuracy of the SMP
Example§ 2.6 Reduction plan coating processes • Remarks: • Onlyforactivities in table Annex IIb • Notforactivitieswithtotalemission limit value • Notfor ‘Heatset’ and ‘Othercleaning’ • Requirements • Addcopy of Reduction plan • Calculate ‘Referenceemission’ and ‘Target emission’ cf Annex IIb (t/a)
Inspector’sguidance§ 2.6 Reduction plan coating processes • Are the multiplication factors correct? • Referenceemission • Target emission • Table in Annex IIb
ExampleSolvent balance I1 • I1: Input, purchased • Provide clearoverview of the calculation • Indicatehowchanges in stock have been handled • Provide percentages of solvent in preparations • Provide source of informationfor percentages • Whatspecificmass was usedforeach solvent
InspectorguidanceI1: Input, purchased • Calculationunderstandable? • Calculation correct? • Handling of stock changes present? • Specificmass correct? • Source of informationclear?
ExampleAccuracy O6 & O8 • O6 waste, O8 reusedexternally • Assume O6 and O8 = 0 • Stillcompliant: OK • Ifnotcompliant,indicate: • howmeasured (add copies) • how solvent content determined (add copies) • Estimateinaccuracy, calculate worst case
Accuracytotal SMP • Calculateemissionswith all worst cases • Whereinaccuranciescannotcoincideindicatewhy • Ifstillcompliant: OK • Ifno more compliant: • Either: improveaccuracy of largest contribuant • Or: demonstratecombination of all worst cases willnotoccur
Estimation O1Waste gas emissionsfromabatement • Estimate part solvent to abatement • Example: input – fugitives –O6/8 • 1000 t – 150t – 75t = 780 t • Determine average ‘notabated’ • Design parameters or recent measurements • Example: ‘in’: 3 g/m³, ‘out’: 50 mg/m³ • 50/3000 = 1,7% • Calculate O1: 780 t x 1,7% = 13 t
Thank you for your attention Paul W.Verspoor MBAverspoor@sitmae.nl+31.346.562.414