1 / 8

Hancock’s On-Track Program

Hancock’s On-Track Program. Neighborhood Chicago Public High School 953 Students, 94% Latino, 96% Free or Reduced Lunch Placed on Probation in 2007 School has shown dramatic academic growth since 2008 We believe it is tied to our Freshman on Track (FoT) Work. Karen Boran, Ed.D., Principal

gella
Download Presentation

Hancock’s On-Track Program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hancock’s On-Track Program • Neighborhood Chicago Public High School • 953 Students, 94% Latino, 96% Free or Reduced Lunch • Placed on Probation in 2007 • School has shown dramatic academic growth since 2008 • We believe it is tied to our Freshman on Track (FoT) Work Karen Boran, Ed.D., Principal At April 30, 2013

  2. Hancock at a Glance • ACTcomposite went from 15.9 in 2011 to 17.0 in 2012 (needs to be 18.3) • Core Passing Rate is 74% (needs to be 85.7%) • Attendancewent from 78.2% in 2010 to 89.3% at 4/15/13 (needs to be 90%) • FOT was 59% in 2008; at 93.7% at 2/01/13 (dropped to 87.3% at 4/15/13; needs to be 93%) • Was Level 3 at start of SIG in 2010-11; missed Level 1 by 1 point in 2012 (earned 27 – needed 28)

  3. How has Freshman On-Track (FoT) Rate Changed for Hancock Students?

  4. Did On-Track Rates Differ by 9th Grade Explore Scores?

  5. On-Track Supports are Part of our RtI Response to Student Need

  6. You’re Only as Good as Your Last Data Set

  7. Hancock has the potential to be a Level 1 school. How do we get there? Hancock Deconstructed Performance Policy ACT Goal SY13 BOY ACT = 15.6 SY13 MOY ACT = 15.4 *SY12 BOY ACT = 15.0 grew to 16.9 EOY Hancock’s SIG goal is 18.3, which if reached will net 4 points out of 6 possible. CHALLENGING An EOY ACT score of 16.7 is more realistic, and would net 3 points. POSSIBLE Attendance Goal YTD attendance = 89.4% If Hancock can achieve an average attendance rate of 85.8%, it will receive 4 points out of 6 possible. EMINENTLY ACHIEVEABLE Hancock would have to attain an average attendance of 96% to net 1 additional point. Freshman on Track Goal 93.7% as of 2/01/13 So long as Hancock’s on-track rate does not drop below 90%, it will earn all 6 possible points for on-track. EMMINENTLY ACHIEVEABLE PSAE, EPAS, AP Success PSAE, EPAS and AP Success make up 15 of 42 possible points. In order to achieve a level 1 rating, Hancock must obtain at least 6 points within these remaining areas. So long as Hancock matches its performance from last year, it will secure all 6 points necessary for the Level 1 rating. POSSIBLE AP Enrollment & Success AP Enrollment = 22.1% If sustained, this will earn Hancock 3 out of 3 possible points. So long as AP Enrollment doesn’t drop below 17.3%, Hancock will secure all 3 points for SY13. EMMINENTLY ACHIEVEABLE One Year Dropout Goal YTD Drop-out = 0 Hancock currently has no students coded as drop-outs. If Hancock can maintain at least a .2 drop-out rate, it will earn Hancock all 6 points. POSSIBLE

  8. FoT Going Forward • New Student-Based Budget puts released FoT Coordinator position in jeopardy • School Improvement Grant in last year (SY14); SEL funding in peril • Targets continue to rise – at what point is further growth no longer feasible? • CPS School Performance Policy changing to include Sophomore on Track as well as FoT • Long-term challenges: • move FoT accountability from teachers to students • change teachers’ philosophy of “failure as motivator”

More Related