270 likes | 369 Views
Jour 2 - Session 2: Définition des priorités . Phase 2. Setting priorities . Principles: Alignment Complementarity/synergy Strategic direction. What : identify strategic areas where FAO should focus its support to the country - Priority Matrix How:
E N D
Jour 2 - Session 2: Définition des priorités
Phase 2. Setting priorities • Principles: • Alignment • Complementarity/synergy • Strategic direction What: identify strategic areas where FAO should focus its support to the country - Priority Matrix How: • Situation Analysis – scope (background work; focus) • Assessment of Comparative Advantages – new SF/RF • Prioritization – focus – fewer number of priorities and outcomes Strategic component of CPF document
Country analysis for UNDAFWHAT’S NEW? • COUNTRY ANALYSIS – The Common Country Assessment (CCA) is no longer mandatory (FAO supported this change) and the UNCT can choose among 3 options: • Contribute to government-led analysis • Support targeted studies • Full CCA
La hiérarchisation des priorités dans la formulation du CPP Analyse des avantages comparatifs Analyse de la situation Priority Matrix Results Matrix
… identification of CHALLENGES (WHAT, HOW and WHO)
Phase 2 – Définition des prioritésAnalyse de la situation ... consultez votre Guide à la page 30 : les questions essentielles suggérées pour guider votre analyse Comprendre les défis et les opportunités
Main elements of Situation Analysis – key questions? • National context – main social and economic development challenges and opportunities with implication for agriculture sector and livelihoods • Situation and outlook for FS,A, RD – current situation, trends – issues, challenges, opportunities • Policy environment - National sector priorities, policies, strategies and programmes addressing the challenges and opportunities • National stakeholders and capacity needs at policy, organizational and individual level • Data and monitoring mechanism to measure progress
Capacity Assessment – building block See: CPF tool 3. pg5 11
Travail de groupe (30’ minutes) Revisez l’extrait: Est-ce que... • ...les défis majeurs ont été bien idéntifiés et présentés dans le document? • ...les strategies et les politiques nationales ont été suffisamment analysées? • ...les priorités nationales ont été idéntifiés? indiquez-les dans la Matrice des Priorités! • les principes de programmation des NU ont été pris suffisamment en consideration?
Activity 1: Review of a country example • Review of a the situation analysis of Lebanon (pages 9 – 12) • Assess to what extent the key criteria (elements) are addressed ? • See page. CPF guide for the main elements (Pg. 30, outline of CPF document: 48) • See print of PPT
Jour 2 - Session 3: Avantagescomparatifs
Plenary discussion– How to ensure strategic focus – i.e. prioritize at the country level ? “If Country Offices asked you to provide them the tips on how to prioritize, what would be your advice”
Prioritization process - Criteria • Preferably emerge from a dialogue with the national stakeholders • Not imposed, yet some suggested for consideration • La haute prioritè– key strategic areas • High priority, although low likelihood for RM • La prioritemoderèe– not Gvt priority • La basseprioritè– no CA, no capacity 3 2 1 4 • Enabling conditions and capacities for achieving the results • Likelihood of sustainability • Ability to produce the highest level of impact • Contribution to the MDGs/IADGs
Zooming into the comparative advantages
Comparative Advantages Butsmondiaux Mandat d’intervenir ObjectifsstratégiquesetOrganizationalresults Fonctionsessentielles • KEY QUESTIONS? • Does it contribute FAO global goals? • Does it fall under the areas that the members want FAO to focus on SO and ORs that FAO committed to achieve? • Does it require application of FAOs core functions which are recognized FAO comparative advantages?
Phase 2 – Définition des prioritésAvantagescomparatifs Buts mondiaux Mandat d’intervenir Objectifs stratégiques Fonctions essentielles Avantages comparatifs au niveau du pays En position d’intervenir Capacité à intervenir Avantages révélés Ressources Avantages perçus Influence Parternariat Lacunes
Validation • Page 33 ou 34 du guide Pertinence
Jour 2 - Session 4: Arbre à problèmes
EFFETS Construire un Arbre à problèmes Sont-ils importants? Tenir compte des effets permet d’identifier des indicateurs possibles Énoncer le problème de façon positive peut fournir le résultat ou l’impact Problème central CAUSES Aborder les causes permet d’identifier des produits ou des activités possibles Mais pourquoi?
Situation analysisKEY MESSAGES Challenge: High prevalence of food insecurity Food availability • Policy and legal framework • Budgetary allocations Policy enabling environment Poor agricultural production and productivity Poor capacity of extension Workers Organizations • Operational capacity of ext. units Individuals Dependency on rain fed cultivation BUT Why ? • Skills level of extension staff Inefficient irrigation system
Plant diseases Lack of cooperation of authorities Drought Low crop & vegetable production production Poor access to market Low level of knowledge & skills Poor education facilities No health clinics Dirty water Poor hygiene knowledge Low income No possibility to find job Low access to health facilities Poor access to enough foods Poor hygiene High prices No information about useful foods Low consumption of diverse food Diseases Malnutrition Nutrition as entry point for joint planning: practical tips FAO-related work Other sectors Bring together a multi-disciplinary team Identify most food insecure population groups Use “malnutrition” as the central problem :
Activité:… identifier les causes et les effets du défi sélectionné • Référez-vous à votre boîte à outil CPP– Outil 2. Analyse des causes et effets, page 3 Outil 3. Évaluation des capacités, page 5 • Choisissez une priorite et identifiez un deficlef|probleme principal du document CPP et inscrivez le sur leflipchart • Construire un arbre à problèmes (à partir de l’analyse de la situation existante fournie dans l’étude de cas for thatpriority)
Activity 3. … identify causes and effects of the selected challenge • Use your CPF toolkit as reference – Tool 2. Cause and effect analysis, pg.3 Tool 3. Capacity assessment, pg.5 • Build a problem tree (from the existing situation analysis provided in the case study)