550 likes | 562 Views
Explore the evolution of surveys detecting Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) across various bands, focusing on X-ray advancements, selection methods, and historical surveys. Understand the complexities of optical, radio, infrared, and high-energy selections, selection effects, advantages of X-ray surveys, and deep Extragalactic X-ray survey challenges. Delve into AGN types, red-shift distribution, selection completeness, and key findings from deep Extragalactic X-ray surveys.
E N D
AGN in X-Ray Surveys For Astro597 Jian Wu November 10, 2004
OUTLINE • Part IAGN Surveys in Different Bands • Part IIAGN X-ray Surveys
Part IAGN Surveys in Different Bands • AGN Surveys in different bands • Retrospect • Optical selection and implications • Radio selection • Infrared selection • High-Energy selection • Selection Effects
Part IIAGN X-ray Surveys • Soft X-rays Surveys • Hard X-ray Surveys • Pre-Chandra and XMM-Newton • Deep Chandra and XMM-Newton Surveys • Deep Extragalactic X-ray Surveys • 2Ms Chandra Point-Source CATA
Part I AGN Surveys in Different Bands
Retrospect • Lamppost Effect • find something in where we can find it • Three types of surveys • Find object • Find object consistently • Find with well-defined selection criteria
Retrospect • First indication (optical) • NGC1068-broad emission lines (Fath, 1913) • M87-jet (Curtis 1917) • Extragalactic radio sources • The origin of name for quasar (Schmidt et.al., 1964)
Retrospect • Early AGN Surveys • Cambridge xC Surveys • Markarian Survey • Zwichky Survey • Recent Large Surveys • 2dF • SDSS • How to find AGN-SED • Power law (1013Hz-1020Hz) • Highly ionized Emission lines-C N O • Low-ionization emission lines-Fe
Optical Selection • Principle (Sandage 1971) • Systematic optical color deviation from starlight • Bonus • Photometric red-shift estimation • Declaration of “complete samples” • Fatal bug • Lb does not correlated well with Lgalaxy→ cannot see low luminosity AGN in massive galaxies (contamination) • Aftermath • Omission (radio, IR, X-ray)
Optical Selection • Optical selection effect • Luminosities • Hard to evaluate • Alternatives • Variability • Absence of proper motion
Radio Selection • Principles • Flat-spectrum, compact radio source • Object with low IR/radio • morphology • Advantages • Efficient • Sensitive • Accurate • Find objects omitted by optical techniques • Disadvantages • Incomplete (selection effect) • Star-forming region
Infrared Selection • Disadvantages • Color difference is subtle • Equivalent width insufficient • An Island • Potential advantages • mid-IR to be a “pivot point” in SED • PAH and high ionization IR lines • Prospect • SIRTF
High-Energy Selection • X-ray and γ-ray • Disadvantages • Soft X-ray suffer from larger extinction • Red-shift distribution • γ-ray position • Soft X-ray bias
Selection Effect • Dilution of the optical/IR brightness and color by the starlight. • Obscuration • Another selection effect
Part II AGN X-ray Surveys
Advantages • High contrast between AGN and stellar light
Advantages • Penetrating power of X-rays.
Advantages • Great sensitivity of Chandra and XMM-Newton
Advantages • Accurate positions from Chandra • ~ 0.5 arcsec
Advantages • A relatively large fraction of the bolometric energy (3-20%) is radiated in the classical X-ray bands. • High area density (400 deg-2) • Large amplitude and frequency of variability in the X-ray band. • Little Contamination from other objects • High red-shift quasars are easy to detect • Close to the black hole
Early X-ray Surveys • Uhuru (1970 10-1973 3) [2-20 keV] • Ariel-V (1973 10-1980 3) [0.3-40 keV] • HEAO-1 (1977 8-1979 1) [0.2keV-10MeV]
Soft X-ray Surveys • Einstein (1978 11-1981 4) [0.2-20 keV] • ROSAT (1990 1-1999 2) [0.1-2.5 keV]
Soft X-ray Surveys • Fruit • Moderate correlation of optical and X-ray
Hard X-ray surveys • ASCA (1993 2-2001 3) [0.4-10 keV] • BeppoSAX (1996 4-2002 4) [0.1-300 keV] • Fruit • ~ 500 serendipitous sources over ~ 100 deg2
Deep Chandra and XMM-NewtonSurveys • Chandra (1999 7-present) • XMM-Newton (1999 10-present)
Deep Chandra and XMM-NewtonSurveys • Fruit • Numerous “optically dull” objects • Greatly enlarge the AGN population
Deep Extragalactic X-ray Surveys • Source classification difficulties • Too faint to be identified by optical spectrum • Many of the X-ray sources have modest optical luminosities, often due to obscuration • “schism” between optical (type1 and type2) and X-ray (unobscured and obscured )
Deep Extragalactic X-ray Surveys • Basic AGN Types • Unobscured AGN • Obscured AGN with clear optical/UV AGN signatures. • Optically faint X-ray sources • XBONGs (X-ray Bright Optically Normal Galaxies)
[Bargar et al. 2002] [Bargar et al. 2003] AGN Red-shift Distribution • Most AGN in deep X-ray surveys have z =0~2 • Redshift distribution show “spikes” in z=0.5~2.5
AGN Selection Completeness • Reasons of incompleteness • Compton thick AGN • Luminous at non-X-ray, but X-ray weak • How many we haven’t seen 2000-3000 deg-2
Key results from DEXS • Large optically selected luminous quasars • PLE (Pure luminosity Evolution) • Moderate-luminosity AGN • LDDE (luminosity-dependent density evolution)
X-ray constraints • Sky density • Bottom line (z > 4) ~ 30-150 deg-2 • AGN contribution to reionization at z ~ 6 is small • Accretion[z>4] ~ Accretion[local] • Infrared and sub-millimeter • star-forming processes • AGN/sub-mm galaxies >=40%. • X-ray survey should remain an effective way to find AGN at the highest redshift
Future prospects • Detailed cosmic history of SMBH accretion • The nature of AGN activity in young, forming galaxies • X-ray measurements of clustering and large-scale structure • The X-ray properties of cosmologically distant starburst and normal galaxies
Main CATAlog High significant Chandra sources Supplementary CATAlog Lower significance Chandra sources The 2Ms CDF-N 20 observations 447.8 arcmin2 Flux limit=2.5×10-17 erg cm-2 s-1 (0.5-2.0 keV) Flux limit=1.4 ×10-16 erg cm-2 s-1 (2.0-8.0 keV)
CIAO Chandra Interactive Analysis of Observations Radiation damage Quantum Efficiency Losses Bad column Bad pixel Cosmic ray afterglow Standard pixel randomization Potential background events Data reduction
Technique feature Matched filter Accuracy of the X-ray source position Correlation of optically bright sources with lower significance Chandra sources Production of CATAlogs
FB HB SB1 SB SB2 HB1 HB2 keV Standard Bands
False positive probability 1×10-7 main CATAlog 1×10-5 supplementary optically bright source CATAlog Point-source Detection • Key criterion
Source Position Refinement X –ray 1.4GHz Radio 503 sources
Supplementary Optically Bright Chandra Source CATA X –ray Optical R-band 79 sources