1 / 45

Assessing Leadership:

Assessing Leadership:. Who is a leader and how do we know it? Tom Mitchell, U. of Baltimore Division of Applied Behavioral Sciences tmitchell@ubalt.edu http://home.ubalt.edu/tmitch 410 837 5348. Why we need to know. Selection - hire new managers (first line to mid level) Promotion

geoffrey-lancaster
Download Presentation

Assessing Leadership:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Assessing Leadership: Who is a leader and how do we know it? Tom Mitchell, U. of Baltimore Division of Applied Behavioral Sciences tmitchell@ubalt.edu http://home.ubalt.edu/tmitch 410 837 5348 May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  2. Why we need to know Selection - hire new managers (first line to mid level) Promotion - succession planning and staffing Development - training and coaching - diagnose problems May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  3. Who are they? • Definitions of leadership: • Person who motivates others to perform well • Directing & coordinating group activities (Fiedler, ‘67) • Influencing others to achieve a common goal (Northouse, 2004) • Building networked relationships to enhance cooperation (Day, 2001) May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  4. Conceptual Distinctions • Born or bred? • Leader Emergence vs. Effectiveness • Leadership vs. Management /supervision May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  5. Conceptual Distinctions • Leadership v. Management • Power sources (French & Raven, ’59) • Position v. Personal power • Power source:Power influence: • 1. Reward: give rewards • 2. Coercive punish • 3. Legitimate demand • 4. Referent identifies with supervisor • 5. Expert knowledge & expertise May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  6. Conceptual Distinctions • Leadership v. Management • Power source:Power: • 1. Reward: give rewards • 2. Coercive punish • 3. Legitimate demand • 4. Referent identifies with supervisor • 5. Expert knowledge & expertise May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  7. Leader vs. Manager(Kotter, ‘90) May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  8. Theories: History (short) • Trait (’20s – ’30s) -> dead end • E.g. height / weight / ambitious / gender • Behavioral (’50s – ’60s: Ohio state, Fleishman & Harris, ’62) • Consideration / initiating structure (LOQ) • Contingency(’60s – ’70s: U. MI; Fiedler ‘67) • Situational leadership (Hersey & Blanchard, 77) • Path -> Goal (House & Mitchell, ’74) • Trait (again!) • Charismatic • Transformational v. transactional (Bass, ’06) May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  9. Leadership: Factors and Competencies(Jeanneret and Silzer, 1998) • Thinking skills • Analyzing information • Solving problems • Work management skills • Planning and organizing work • Being resourceful • Interpersonal and communication skills • Building networks • Relating to others • Leadership skills • Motivating and inspiring others • Coaching and developing others May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  10. Factors and Competencies (cont’) • Motivation skills • Adapting to change • Showing drive and taking action • Personal factors • Demonstrating integrity and trust • Modeling cultural values • Organizational skills • Focusing on customers • Committing to quality • Technical skills • Demonstrating functional expertise • Knowing the business May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  11. Transformational Leadership(Bass & Avolio, ‘2000) • Transformational Leadership • Transactional Leadership • Passive/Avoidant May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  12. Personal traits: Transformational Leadership • Transactional leaders • Social exchange • Transformational leaders • Stimulate and Inspire • Grow and develop • Empower followers • Passive/Avoidant • MBE / Lassiez Faire May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  13. Transformational Leader Characteristics • Idealized Influence • Role model / emulation • Inspirational Motivation • Vision / challenging • Intellectual Stimulation • Encourages creativity • Individualized Consideration • Coaching / mentoring  May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  14. Assessing Leadership • Who they are (now we know) • How do we know? • Why do we need to know? • Identifying and Assessing Leaders (assessment strategies) May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  15. Need to Identify Them • Recruitment • Selection • Succession planning (promotion) • Development May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  16. Assessment: How to • Start with Job analysis: • Id SMEs • Conduct interviews • Review job description • Confirm leadership duties and KSAOs • (use factors and competencies) • Develop matrix (duties & competencies) • Document Job Analysis findings May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  17. Assessment: Issues in Assessing • Validity & reliability • Utility (effectiveness and cost) • Test portability (VG) May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  18. Assessment: Issues • Validity strategies • Content validity • Criterion related validity • Construct validity • Face validity May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  19. Assessment: Issues • Utility • Effectiveness • Logistics • Screening or ranking • Costs • Internal: Agency Personnel • External: Vendors = $$$ May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  20. Assessment: Issues • Validity Generalization • Constructs are valid • Job analysis: JA verification • Test portability • Why re-invent the wheel? May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  21. Assessment: Principal Traits(Northouse, ’04) • Intelligence • Self-confidence • Determination • Integrity • Sociability May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  22. Assessment: Methods • Personal History • Assessment center • Behavioral interview / Oral board • handout “Candidate Leadership Ratings” • Written tests / inventories May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  23. Assessment: Personal History • Supplemental application blank • References • Past performance reviews • Past accomplishments • Peer assessments (promo / dev) • 360 / multi-rater May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  24. Assessment: Assessment Center • Situational interview • In-basket technique • Job simulation • Leaderless Group Discussion • Leader emergence May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  25. Assessment: Written tests/ inventories • Cognitive ability • Integrity inventories • Personality inventories • Leadership ability tests • Biodata May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  26. Assessment: Cognitive Ability • Watson-Glazer Critical Thinking Appraisal (Psychological Corporation: Harcourt Brace, Pub) • -> Measures: • Inference • Recognition of Assumptions • Deduction • Interpretation (generalizing, conclusions) • Evaluation of Arguments • Wonderlic Personnel Test • (Wonderlic Personnel Test, Inc., 1992. 1-800 323-3742 ) • -> Measures • “g” general intelligence (potential for development) • Extensive norms May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  27. Assessment: Integrity • Integrity tests • Overt • Personality • Hogan Personnel Selection Scale • (organizational delinquency) • http://www.hoganassessments.com/ • Polygraph (?) May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  28. Assessment: Personality Inventories • NEO-PI (Five factor model) • (Costa & McRae, ’92) • CPI (California Psychological Inventory) • CPP (Gough) • HPI (Hogan Personality Inventory) • (R. & J. Hogan) • IPIP (International Personality Item Pool) • (L.Goldberg) May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  29. Five Factor Model: Big Five Personality Dimensions (C A N O E)(Barrick & Mount, ’91 • Conscientiousness • persistence, doggedness, hardworking,dependable, • thorough, and responsible. • Agreeableness • being liked, courtesy, good-natured, cooperative, forgiving, soft hearted. • Neuroticism • anxiety, depression, anger worry, and insecurity. • Open to Experience • imaginative, creative, broad-minded and intelligent. • Extroversion • sociability, gregariousness, talkativeness,and activity.  . May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  30. NEO-PI • NEO-PI-R (Costa & McRae, ‘92) • NEO Personality Inventory: Revised • Long & short version • Management report • Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. (PAR) http://www3.parinc.com/ May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  31. CPI:Psychological Personality Inventory (3rd ed) • 20 scales (approximate “Big five”) • 2 special scales: • Managerial Potential (Mp) • Leadership Potential (Lp) • Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc. (CPP) • http://www.cpp.com/ May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  32. Hogan Personality Inventory:(HPI) • 7 traits: BIG Five • Adjustment (Neuroticism) • Ambition / Sociability (Extraversion) • Likeability (Agreeableness) • Prudence (Conscientiousness) • Intellectance & (Openness) • school success • Hogan Assessments, Inc. http://www.hoganassessments.com/ May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  33. IPIP • IPIP International Personality Item Pool • (L.Goldberg) http://ipip.ori.org/ipip/ • Five Factors: • http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/j/5/j5j/IPIP/ • Long version: 300 items (40-60 minutes) • Short version: 120 items (15-20 minutes) May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  34. Leadership Ability:Measures • Leadership Opinion Questionnaire (LOQ) • (Self report) • TheSupervisory Behavior Description(SBD)  • (used by subordinates to rate supervisor) • (E. Fleishman, Ohio State studies) • Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) • (B. Bass, transformational Leadership) May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  35. Leadership Ability: LOQ • Two dimensions (independent constructs) • Consideration • Concern for others • Initiating structure • Task oriented • Creative Organizational Design, Inc. (COD) • http://www.creativeorgdesign.com/testpages/loq.htm May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  36. LOQ: Consideration • Relationships with subordinates characterized by: • Mutual trust • Respect for their ideas • Consideration of their feelings • Warmth between manager and subordinate • High score: Good rapport and two-way communications • Low score: More impersonal in relations with group members May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  37. LOQ: Initiating Structure • Defines own and subordinates’ rolestoward goal attainment • High score: Takes very active role in directing activities through • Planning • Communicating information • Scheduling • Criticizing • Trying new ideas •  Low score: Relatively inactivein directing activites May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  38. LOQ used for: • Training • Assessment of culture • Selection • Coaching May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  39. MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire(Bass & Avolio) • Transformational Leadership • Transactional Leadership • Passive/Avoidant • Mindgarden, Inc.http://mindgarden.com/products/mlqr.htm May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  40. MLQ: Used for • Selection • Succession Planning • Development (3600 Feedback) • Diagnosis / coaching May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  41. Some Vendors • CCLCenter for Creative Leadership • http://www.ccl.org/leadership/index.aspx • PDI Personnel Decisions International • http://www.personneldecisions.com • DDI Development Dimensions International • http://www.ddiworld.com/our_expertise/leadership.asp • Personnel Testing Council Metropolitan Washington • http://www.ptcmw.org/ (I/O consulting firms) May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  42. Conclusion • Because • We know who they are & • Can identify them • We can • Improve Agency functioning & productivity • Through effectiveness • Reduce costs • Improve the bottom line May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  43. Leadership • Comments? • Questions? May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  44. Online Sources: • Center for Creative Leadership • http://www.ccl.org/leadership/index.aspx • Development Dimensions International (DDI) • http://www.ddiworld.com/our_expertise/leadership.asp • Personnel Decisions International • http://www.personneldecisions.com • Hogan Personnel Selection Scale • http://www.hoganassessments.com/ • Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire • http://mindgarden.com/products/mlqr.htm • Leadership Opinion Questionnaire (LOQ) • http://www.creativeorgdesign.com/testpages/loq.htm May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

  45. References • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26. • Bass, B. M. & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, pub. • Bass, B. & Avolio, B. (2000). MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire 2nd ed. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden • Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO PI Personality Inventory: NEO PI and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO FFI: Professional Manual: Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.) • Fiedler, F. (1967). A theory of Leadership Effectiveness. New York: McGraw Hill. • Fleishman, E. A. & Harris, E. F. (1962). Patterns of leadership behavior related to employee grievances and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 15, 43-56. • French, J. R. P, & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright. (Ed.), • Studies of social power ) pp. 150-157. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research. • Jeanneret, Richard, & Silzer, Rob. (1998). Individual Psychological Assessment Predicting behavior in organizational settings. Jossey Bass pub. Chapter 12 Shaping organizational leadership. • Johnson, Jeff W., Questar Data Systems, Inc. Mineapolis, MN JEFFJ@PDI-CORP.COM • (Handout for ratings leadership characteristics) • Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1977). Management of Organizational Behavior, 3rd 3d. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall • House, R. J., & Mitchell, T. R. (1974). Path-goal theory of leadership. Journal of Contemporary Business, 3, 81-97. • Kotter, J. P. (1990). A force for change: How leadership differs from management (pp. 3-8). New York: Free Press • Northouse, Peter G. (2004). Leadership: Theory and Practice. 3rd ed. Sage, pub. May 17, 2006 Md. SHA

More Related