130 likes | 268 Views
Prosecution Group Luncheon Patents. August 2012. Proposed First-To-File Rules. Add definitions in AIA to Rules Declarations for removing references based on exceptions in new 102 Notification to PTO of post-AIA claim or new matter in child application Comment period closes October 5
E N D
Prosecution Group LuncheonPatents August 2012
Proposed First-To-File Rules • Add definitions in AIA to Rules • Declarations for removing references based on exceptions in new 102 • Notification to PTO of post-AIA claim or new matter in child application • Comment period closes October 5 • 77 Fed. Reg. 43742-59 (July 26, 2012)
Submissions to Remove References • Recall prior art exceptions in new 102(b)/(c): reference information not applicable if • It and claimed invention commonly owned or part of activities of joint research agreement • Within 1 year of filing, it came from inventor or one who obtained from inventor (“OWO”), or it came after public disclosure of the information by inventor or OWO • Proposed Rule 104(c): common ownership • Applicant files statement in the record • Joint research agreement condition also requires giving names of parties to agreement in application
Submissions to Remove References • Proposed Rule 130: Declarations • (a)(1) Show that reference was by inventor, or that its info was publicly disclosed by inventor before reference date • (a)(2) Same, as to reference or disclosure by OWO • Reference is by inventor: decl’n must show he/she is in fact inventor of relied-on info • Reference by OWO: same, and show inventor communicated the relied-on info (in)directly to OWO
Submissions to Remove References • Inventor disclosed before reference: decl’n must • Identify/give date of disclosure • Show inventor is in fact inventor of that earlier disclosure • If reference is printed publication, provide copy • If not, describe disclosure with “detail and particularity” to show it is public disclosure of relied-on information • OWO disclosed before reference: same, and show communication of relied-on info
Statements of Post-AIA Claims, Disclosure In post-AIA applications claiming pre-AIA benefit, that include(d) claim(s) with post-AIA date • Must file “statement to that effect” by later of: • Four months from application filing date • 16 months from benefit-application filing date • Date that the first post-AIA claim is presented • Need not identify particular claim(s) • “upon reasonable belief, this application contains at least one claim that has an effective filing date on or after March 16, 2013” Proposed 37 CFR 1.55, 1.78(a)
Statements of Post-AIA Claims, Disclosure In post-AIA applications claiming pre-AIA benefit, with disclosure not also in benefit application • Must file “statement to that effect” by later of: • Four months from application filing date • 16 months from benefit-application filing date • Need not identify particular matter • “upon reasonable belief, this application contains subject matter not also disclosed in” the prior foreign, provisional or non-provisional application
Statements of Post-AIA Claims, Disclosure • If you fail to provide statement in given time period, or seek to retract statement • May result in Rule 105 request for specific identification of support in benefit-application • No statement required if: • Application discloses only subject matter also in benefit-application • Benefit only claimed to applications dated 3/16/13 or after
Proposed Post-AIA Examination Guidelines • Reviews new provisions and how to apply • Guidelines generally consider that procedure and theory remains the same • Anticipation, enablement standards • No “difference of approach to the question of obviousness” • Notes that geographic limitations are removed • Comment period closes October 5 • 77 Fed. Reg. 43759-73 (July 26, 2012)
Proposed Post-AIA Examination Guidelines • “On Sale” • Comment sought on whether public availability has role • “Otherwise available prior art”: “Catch-all” provision • Focus on availability rather than on means of dissemination • May include thesis, poster display, Internet posting, transaction not amounting to UCC “sale” • Removing prior art through early disclosure • Inventor’s earlier public disclosure must be the same as the disclosure in the reference to be removed • Even if differences between reference info and inventor’s earlier disclosure “are mere insubstantial changes, or only trivial or obvious variations,” the exception does not apply
New Google Patents Features • European Patents • Search by number (e.g. EP1692064A1) • OCR text, links to EP site • Prior Art Finder • Identifies key phrases from patent text, makes search query • Results come from Google Patents, Google Scholar, Google Books, and web