250 likes | 374 Views
Who’s Who. Technical. Evaluations. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 200. 200. 200. 200. 200. 200. 300. 300. 300. 300. 300. 300. 400. 400. 400. 400. 400. 400.
E N D
Who’s Who Technical Evaluations 100 100 100 100 100 100 200 200 200 200 200 200 300 300 300 300 300 300 400 400 400 400 400 400
Conducts a Comprehensive Review and Evaluation of Proposals Against the Solicitation Requirements and Approved Evaluation Criteria.
Responsible for Proper and Efficient Conduct of Source Selection Process.
Established by SSA to Gain Functional Expertise and Support.
Manages the Evaluation Team and Acts as Interface to SSA and SSAC.
Technical Rating When a Proposal Does NOT Meet Requirements and Contains One or More Deficiencies.
An Acion that Should be Performed by an Evaluator When There are Two or More Technical Proposals.
This is a Risk Rating that can Potentially Cause Disruption of Schedule, Increased Cost or Degradation of Performance. Government Monitoring Will Likely be Required to Overcome Difficulties.
Two Technical Rating Methodologies that can be Evaluated Separately or Combined as a Single Rating.
An Aspect of an Offeror’s Proposal that Has Merit or Exceeds Specified Performance or Capability Requirements in a Way that is Advantageous to the Government During Contract Performance.
. Defined as a Flaw in an Offeror’s Proposal that Increases the Risk of Unsuccessful Contract Performance.
DAILY DOUBLE Part of the FAR Which Addresses Contractor Responsibility.
Defined as a Material Failure of a Proposal to Meet a Government Requirement or a Combination of Significant Weaknesses in a Proposal that Increases the Risk of Unsuccessful Contract Performance to an Acceptable Level .
. What is a Deficiency?