120 likes | 225 Views
A Brief History of IFIP WG 8.2 Research. IFIP Working Group 8.2 Information Systems and Organizations. The People, the Places, the Methods, and the Issues 1990-2009. Most Popular Keywords. Conferences: 1990-2009. Total: 441. Most Active Authors. Gender of Authors Overall.
E N D
A Brief History of IFIP WG 8.2 Research IFIP Working Group 8.2Information Systems and Organizations The People, the Places,the Methods, and the Issues1990-2009
Conferences: 1990-2009 Total: 441
Gender of Authors Overall 32% 68%
Geographical Locations of Authors Note: counts from only 339 papers
Most Represented Universities • London School of Economics • Georgia State University • Copenhagen Business School • Aalborg University • The Pennsylvania State University • Brunel University • University of Oslo • University of Manchester
Some observations • Data obtained from 1990 onwards • Some of the earlier conferences were ground-breaking e.g. Manchester 1984 • Many senior scholars are members of 8.2 (e.g. Kalle Lyytinen, Rudy Hirschheim, Allen Lee, Lynne Markus, Gordon Davis) and have been influenced by 8.2
Some observations post 1990 • The “academic business model” includes one peer reviewed conference per year and one informal OASIS workshop per year • Active members include very senior scholars while welcoming new members = continual infusion of new ideas and new blood • 8.2 “tradition” is valued and is taken seriously • Almost all conferences in USA or Europe • But “debate” not as vigorous as in the old days
The culture of IFIP WG 8.2 • Key focus = the development and use of information technologies in organizational contexts • Willingness to engage with new technologies, new ideas, wider IS community • In favor of engaging with social theories (ANT, ST etc) to help explain and understand IS • Willingness to debate and disagree with the “accepted wisdom” • Suspicious of hype • Emotional attachment to the book
Conclusions • IFIP WG 8.2 one of the most active, largest and successful IFIP working groups • Has influenced many IS scholars and the IS field as a whole • Publication model? • A need to be truly global? • Relationship with AIS?