1 / 23

Experimental Design: Between and within factors

Experimental Design: Between and within factors. Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology. Announcements. Exam 2 coming up (Oct 27). Between versus Within Subjects Designs. Between subjects designs Each participant participates in one-and-only-one condition of the experiment .

georgeh
Download Presentation

Experimental Design: Between and within factors

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Experimental Design: Between and within factors Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology

  2. Announcements • Exam 2 coming up (Oct 27)

  3. Between versus Within Subjects Designs • Between subjects designs • Each participant participates in one-and-only-one condition of the experiment. • Within subjects designs • all participants participate in all of the conditions of the experiment.

  4. Example • What is the effect of presenting words in color on memory for those words? • So you present lists of words for recall either in color or in black-and-white.

  5. levels • So each of the participants is in only one level of the IV 1 Between factor - 2 levels Clock Chair Cab Colored words participants Test BW words Clock Chair Cab

  6. levels participants Colored words BW words Test Test • So all of the participants are in both levels of the IV 1 Within factor - 2 levels Club Chain Cat Clock Chair Cab

  7. Between subjects designs. • Advantages: • Independence of groups (levels of the IV) • Harder to guess what the experiment is about without experiencing the other levels of IV • exposure to different levels of the independent variable(s) cannot “contaminate” the dependent variable • No order effects to worry about • Counterbalancing is not required • Sometimes this is a ‘must,’ because you can’t reverse the effects of prior exposure to other levels of the IV

  8. Colored words Test participants BW words Between subjects designs • Disadvantages • Individual differences between the people in the groups • Non-Equivalentgroups • Excessive variability

  9. Individual differences • Non- Equivalent groups • The groups may differ not only because of the IV, but also because the groups are composed of different individuals

  10. Dealing with Individual Differences • Equivalent groups • Created equally - use the same process to create both groups • Treated equally - keep the experience as similar as possible for the two groups • Composed of equivalent individuals • Random assignment to groups • Matching groups - match each individuals in one group to an individual in the other group on relevant characteristics

  11. matched matched matched matched Matching groups Group A Group B

  12. NR NR R R NR other other exp Individual differences • Excessive variability due to individual differences • Harder to detect the effect of the IV if there is one

  13. Within subjects designs • Advantages: • Don’t have to worry about individual differences • Same people in all the conditions • Variability between groups is smaller (statistical advantage) • Fewer participants are required

  14. Within subjects designs • Disadvantages • Order effects: • Carry-over effects • Progressive error • Counterbalancing is probably necessary • Range effects

  15. Order effects • Carry-over effects • Transfer between conditions is possible • Effects may persist from one condition into another • e.g. Alcohol vs no alcohol experiment on the effects on hand-eye coordination. Hard to know how long the effects of alcohol may persist.

  16. Order effects • Progressive error • Practice effects – improvement due to repeated practice • Fatigue effects – performance deteriorates as participants get bored, tired, distracted

  17. Dealing with order effects • Counterbalancing is probably necessary • This is used to control for “order effects” • Ideally, use every possible order • (n!, e.g., AB = 2! = 2 orders; ABC = 3! = 6 orders, ABCD = 4! = 24 orders, etc). • All counterbalancing assumes Symmetrical Transfer • the assumption that AB and BA have reverse effects and thus cancel out in a counterbalanced design

  18. Colored words BW words Test Test participants BW words Colored words Test Test Counterbalancing • Simple case • Two conditions A & B • Two counterbalanced orders: • AB • BA

  19. Counterbalancing • Often it is not practical to use every possible ordering • Partial counterbalancing • Latin square designs – a form of partial counterbalancing, so that each group of trials occur in each position an equal number of times

  20. A B C D Order 1 B C D A Order 2 C D A B Order 3 D A B C Order 4 Partial counterbalancing • Example: consider four conditions • Recall: ABCD = 4! = 24 possible orders 1) Unbalanced Latin square: each condition appears in each position

  21. Partial counterbalancing • 2) Balanced Latin square: each condition appears before and after all others

  22. Within subjects designs • Range effects – (context effects) can cause a problem • The range of values for your levels may impact performance (typically best performance in middle of range). • Since all the participants get the full range of possible values, they may “adapt” their performance (the DV) to this range.

  23. Mixed factorial designs • Mixed designs • This only works with factorial (multi-factor) designs • Treat some factors as within-subjects (participants get all levels of that factor) and others as between-subjects (each level of this factor gets a different group of participants).

More Related