430 likes | 436 Views
Explore MIT's e-commerce journey, including goals, landscape, and key outcomes. Discover the advantages and disadvantages of the ECAT model, along with success measures and the road ahead.
E N D
E-Commerce @MIT EDUCAUSE 2000 October 11, 2000 Bob Ferrara, Director, I/T Delivery Lorraine Rappaport, E-Commerce Project Manager
Agenda - E-Commerce@MIT • Overview of MIT’s initiatives • Bob Ferrara • Electronic Catalog (ECAT) demo • Lorraine Rappaport • What we have learned • Bob Ferrara
MIT E-Commerce Goals • Strategy based on MIT ReEngineering objectives from mid-1990s • Goals included: • Consolidate suppliers • Reduce paper-based transactions • Outsource lab and office supplies • Leverage buying power
MIT E-Commerce Landscape • Buy-side initiatives came first • ECAT – two generations of web ordering from partner vendors • VIP Card – procurement credit card • SAPweb – online web requisitioning • No personalized portals, e-marketplaces…yet • Infrastructure developed • X.509 certificate authority for authentication • EDI server deployed for vendor transactions • SAP for authorizations and approvals
MIT E-Commerce Landscape • Sell-side efforts are current focus • Online ordering through Internal Providers for intra-MIT transactions • Web ordering and online credit card processing for MIT merchants • ShopSite for catalog development • CyberCash and/or other software for credit card processing
VIP Card • The VIP Card is a just credit card but… • MIT pays the invoices • SAP receives daily batch of invoices • Approvers may distribute charges • Transaction history maintained in SAP and MIT data warehouse • Average transactions/month: 6,000+ or 44% of all procurement transactions • Average dollar volume/month: $1.2m • Average transaction value: $196
SAPweb Requisitioning • SAPweb is a simpler, home-grown extension of the SAP GUI screens • Four functions: • Create Requisition • Display Requisition • List Requisitions • Display PO (including payment history) • Avoided deployment of SAPgui all over campus • Average number of reqs./month: 3,000+ or 25% of all procurement transactions
ECAT • ECAT (short for Electronic CATalog) is MIT’s system for online ordering from our preferred vendors for commodity items. • ECAT is fully integrated with our SAP R/3 system for requisitioning, workflow approvals, and invoicing.
ECAT Design Strategy • Preferred vendor relationships • Vendor-managed product catalogs • Vendor capabilities – OBI, EDI • Authentication – x.509 digital certificates • Integration with SAP for requisitioning, authorizations, approvals, payment processing, reporting, etc.
ECAT Implementation • First vendor, NECX, rolled out in February, 1999 • Office Depot, BOC Gases, and VWR Scientific Products added later • Average transactions/month: 2,000+ or approximately 15% of all transactions • Discussions underway with four prospective new ECAT partners
Why Not Use the VIP Card for ECAT? • Many fewer VIP Cards than users with requisitioning authority in SAP (1500 cards vs. 4000 requisitioners) • Equipment purchases not allowed on VIP Card • VIP Card purchases limited to $3,000 (was $500 when we started) • Very limited reporting of VIP Card transactions in SAP • Our prices would likely be higher as vendors would pay transaction fees
Advantages of the ECAT Model • Fully integrated with SAP • Modular design • Familiar look-and-feel for users • Takes full advantage of vendors’ value-added features (e.g., MIT recommended products, MSDS, searches, etc.) • Allows procurement staff to focus on vendor relationship management and outreach
Disadvantages of the ECAT Model • Multiple vendor sites – different capabilities and navigation • Direct connections to each vendor • Many components to maintain • Not scalable to all vendors • Back-end batch processing in SAP and at vendor sites mean that order placement is not quite real time
The Road from Here • Are we having fun yet? Success measures • Looking ahead • Lessons Learned
Are we having fun yet? How do we measure success? • Results: Achieved goals; statistical measures • Relationships: • Vendors - managing relationships has high costs • Internal relationships - end-user, centralized / de-centralized experience, communication, training • Above all - managing the change issues • Process: understand business before technology
Looking Ahead • Can commercial solutions fit? • Greater aggregation and coherence for customer – catalog experience • Individual relationships vs. catalog aggregators and marketplaces • Greater influence on vendors: • Emphasize de-centralized purchasing • Authentication and authorizations • Standards – OBI, EDI, and XML • Focus and development on internal providers strategies
Lessons Learned: if you’re thinking of doing e-commerce • “E-business is just business” – understand your business objectives first • Don’t be afraid to dabble – you don’t have to get it right the first time • Make sure your solution is flexible enough to adapt to evolving technology and user requirements
Lessons Learned: continued • Interdependencies carry some risks: • Reliance on other systems and their schedules, interfaces, and support • Communication and collaboration are critical to success • Understand the impact of change on vendors, customers, and central office staff • Have fun. This is cool stuff.
For more information • Main SAPweb page: http://web.mit.edu/sapweb • Main ECAT page: http://web.mit.edu/ecat • ECAT design specifications: http://web.mit.edu/ljr/www/ecat_spec.html • This presentation: http://web.mit.edu/ljr/www/presentations/educause2000.html
Contacts • Lorraine Rappaport, ljr@mit.edu, 617-253-0749 • Bob Ferrara, rferrara@mit.edu, 617-253-7495
Appendix on e-marketplaces • Intriguing concept with many benefits: • Access to wide variety of suppliers • Easier to add new vendors • Some offerings are very expensive for buyers and sellers • Integration with buyers’ internal systems still needs work • Do they help or hinder vendor partnerships?
Appendix on XML • We are hoping to experiment with XML with one or two new vendors • Expected benefits: • XML should lower barriers for small and medium size vendors • XML provides ability to use same data in different ways for different audiences • Current limitations: • Many different and proprietary versions of XML • ebXML and RosettaNet initiatives may resolve some problems
Appendix on XML (cont.) • The ebXML and RosettaNet consortia initiatives may resolve some problems by developing a technical framework for for utilizing XML to exchange business data • http://www.ebxml.org • http://www.rosettanet.org • The two initiatives overlap and are expected to converge