210 likes | 727 Views
Relevant Evidence. Relevant EvidenceAny evidence that tends to prove or disprove any disputed fact in the caseMerely needs to show that it is more probable that the facts exists than it appeared before the evidence was introducedNo single piece of evidence has to make a fact appear more probable
E N D
1. Types of Evidence Chapter 3
Rules of Evidence
2. Relevant Evidence Relevant Evidence
Any evidence that tends to prove or disprove any disputed fact in the case
Merely needs to show that it is more probable that the facts exists than it appeared before the evidence was introduced
No single piece of evidence has to make a fact appear more probable than not
3. Relevant Evidence Relevant evidence tends to establish a fact that is “at issue” in the case
A fact that is in dispute
Probative value
Makes it appear that a fact probably occurred
Tends to prove
4. Relevant Evidence To be admissible in trial relevant evidence must be material
Material Evidence
Must be relevant to some fact that is at issue in the case
Have more than just a remote connection to the fact (can’t be too far removed from the issue)
5. Relevant Evidence Relevant evidence is NOT admissible if it would be
Unusually prejudicial due to emotional impact on the jury
Distract from the main issues
Have minimal relevance (tests showing low accuracy rates)
6. Relevant Evidence Cumulative evidence
Evidence from a different witness that contains all the essential details of previous witnesses
May be excluded because it restates the same
7. Relevant Evidence Corroborative evidence
Supports details of the case but does not duplicate what a prior witness said
8. Relevant Evidence Limited admissibility
Relevant to one issue but the jury is told that they cannot consider it on other issues
9. Relevant Evidence Only relevant evidence can be admitted in court
Any evidence will not be admitted in trial if the evidence was obtained in violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights or…
If it violates an exception
10. Divided into two types Evidence can be classified into two types
Direct Evidence
Circumstantial Evidence
11. Direct and Circumstantial Evidence Direct Evidence
Proves a fact without the need for an inference or presumption
If the direct evidence is accepted by the trier of fact (jury) then the fact/issue it relates to is conclusively established
12. Direct and Circumstantial Evidence Circumstantial Evidence
Evidence that indirectly proves a fact
Requires the trier-of-fact to usn an inference or presumption in order to conclude that the fact exists
13. Direct and Circumstantial Evidence Inference
A logical conclusion that a person can make based on a fact or group of facts
Presumption
A conclusion that the law requires the jury to make
14. Testimonial and Real Evidence Testimonial Evidence
Evidence given by a competent witness testifying under oath or affirmation in a court proceeding
Affidavits and depositions are frequently included in testimonial evidence
15. Testimonial and Real Evidence Real Evidence
Anything that can be perceived with the five senses that tends to prove a fact in issue
Testimonial evidence is excluded
16. Substitutes For Evidence Three Substitutes for Evidence
Stipulation
Judicial Notice
Presumptions
17. Substitutes For Evidence Stipulation
An agreement between the opposing attorneys to admit that one or more facts exist
18. Substitutes For Evidence Judicial Notice
Procedure where the judge, on his/her own authority, tells the jury to conclude that a fact exists
19. Substitutes For Evidence Presumption
A conclusion that the law requires the jury to draw from one or more facts that have been established by the evidence introduced at trial