1 / 11

Strengthening Credible Evidence to Nurture a National Research Agenda for Technology in Education

Strengthening Credible Evidence to Nurture a National Research Agenda for Technology in Education. PT3 Catalyst Leadership Retreat II Washington D.C., USA Sept. 19, 2003 Gerald Knezek Professor of Technology & Cognition University of North Texas (gknezek@tenet.edu). Some Perspectives.

geri
Download Presentation

Strengthening Credible Evidence to Nurture a National Research Agenda for Technology in Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Strengthening Credible Evidence to Nurture a National Research Agenda for Technology in Education PT3 Catalyst Leadership Retreat II Washington D.C., USA Sept. 19, 2003 Gerald Knezek Professor of Technology & Cognition University of North Texas (gknezek@tenet.edu)

  2. Some Perspectives • Lederman (2003) What works: A commentary on the nature of scientific research • “…it is clear that those chanting the ‘what works’ mantra are as confused as the general public and K-12 students about the meaning of scientific research.” (p. 4) • Kemeny (1959) A Philosopher Looks at Science • Three major stages of scientific method: • Theory formation • Deduction of consequences • Verification of predictions (p. 247) • “The most characteristic feature of science is its method” • Fulton et. Al (1995) Teachers and Technology: Making the Connection • “With 40,000 participants and a 1993 average of 100,000 log-ons per month, the Texas Education Network (TENET) is among the largest and most successful state efforts to open the world of telecommunications technology to teachers.” (p. 116)

  3. Foundation to Build From: Dissertation Studies • Christensen: Teacher Integration Training => Positive Student IT Attitudes Christensen, R. (2002). Impact of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34 (4), 411-434. • Hopson: Technology Enriched Middle School Group > Comparison Group in Problem Solving Hopson, M., Simms, R., & Knezek, G. (2002). Effects of a technology enriched learning environment on student development of higher order thinking skills. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 34(2), 109-119. • For others see: Knezek & Christensen (2002). Impact of New Information Technologies on Teachers and Students. Education and Information Technologies, 7(4), 369-376.

  4. Federal Projects: Suggested Build-on Approach • Look across: • similar projects within a program (replication) • programs for similar findings (meta-analysis) • Examine longitudinal (multi-year) impact • Add research agenda to program evaluation • Consider reversing perspective • projects as ‘guinea pigs’ for strong research designs • Researchers/evaluators could be lead PIs • Find strong comparison group • Matched pairs OK if random selection not possible

  5. Areas of Research NeedsRoblyer & Knezek (2003). New Millenium Research for Educational Technology: A Call for a National Research Agenda. JRTE, 36(1). • Research to Establish Relative Advantage • Doty, Popplewell, and Byers (2002) - reading via interactive storybooks • Research to improve technology implementation methods • Roblyer And Marshall (2002-2003) - instrument to predict students’ success in Virtual High School courses • Research to monitor technology’s impact on societal goals • Chisholm, Carey, and Hernandez (2002) - uses of IT by students of various ethnic backgrounds • Studies that help us shape desired directions • Harris and Jones (1999) - communication patterns of online mentoring

  6. Area 2: Teacher Stage of Adoption vs. Home Access 2001(SITE 2003 Research Award)

  7. Area 3: Trends in Computer Enjoyment - 2001 sample (Girls & Computers, NECC 2003)

  8. Area 4: Attitudes Toward School - Maine Learning Technology Initiative (MLTI) 7th Graders 2003(unpublished)

  9. Why are These Types of Research Important? • Efficient use of public funds • Preservation of national economy • Improving quality of life • Monitoring long term impact on society

  10. New AERA SIG • TACTL (Technology as an Agent for Change in Teaching & Learning) • First full year: 100 members strong • 2003: Focused on PT3 outcomes - Chicago • 2004: 41 proposals submitted - San Diego • 88 reviewers reading 2-5 each now • Forums at AERA, NECC (SITE, EdMedia?) to build bridges to technology groups

  11. For Further Information • Research Findings: • http://www.iittl.unt.edu/ • AERA SIG • http://www.iittl.unt.edu/tactl • G. Knezek • http://courseweb.tac.unt.edu/gknezek

More Related