150 likes | 546 Views
Claim 1: Subject Matter Knowledge. Definition Needed :. Competencies & Data Sources. Competencies: 1, 2, Data Sources: Unit Plan, University Supervisor & Cooperating Teachers observations, COE exit survey, MDE Supervisor Survey, GPA, MTTC. Performance Assessments and Observation Data.
E N D
Claim 1:Subject Matter Knowledge Definition Needed:
Competencies & Data Sources • Competencies: 1, 2, • Data Sources: Unit Plan, University Supervisor & Cooperating Teachers observations, COE exit survey, MDE Supervisor Survey, GPA, MTTC
Performance Assessments and Observation Data • Add Table 7 from section 4
Claim 1: Findings • Finding 1 • Finding 2 • There does not seem to be any clear cut findings for this claim, in general. You have them for the Cross-cutting themes, but not general statements.
Cross-Cutting Themes • Claim 2 supports claim 1. Students cannot apply things (claim 2) that they do not understand (claim 1) • THIS HAS TO BE LINKED TO THE DATA. • WHAT DOES THE DATA ANALYSIS TELL US, and how does it relate to subject matter knowledge?
CCT: LEARNING TO LEARN • Receiving passing grades in 100 % of content area classes is evidence that strategies for learning were at their command • Successful completion of the MTTC test demonstrated their mastery of content material again evidencing their ability to learn • THESE HAVE TO BE LINKED TO THE DATA. WHAT DOES THE DATA ANALYSIS TELL US?
CCT: Multicultural • Foreign culture requirement – met by 100% of undergrads • THIS HAS TO BE LINKED TO THE DATA. WHAT DOES THE DATA ANALYSIS TELL US? Find the specific data for each data source that supports this CCT.
CCT: Technology • Computer literacy requirement – met by 100% of undergrads • Blackboards as a technological tool used in a majority of classes • E-portfolios – effective as of Fall 2010 • THESE HAVE TO BE LINKED TO THE DATA. WHAT DOES THE DATA ANALYSIS TELL US?
Claim 1: Discussion • What do the findings mean? (Discuss this in your group)
Claim 3: Implications • Need better documentation of how students use technology in their teaching • Are there other implications that can be made from the findings and discussions?
QUESTIONS • Do we feel comfortable as a faculty making this claim? Why/Why not? • What are the strengths of this claim? • What are the weaknesses? • Are there other assessments/tools we should be examining to assure content knowledge?