631 likes | 1.11k Views
Black-body radiation: Planck distribution (Rayleigh-Jeans, Wien distributions) Wien’s Law Stefan(-Boltzmann) Law. supergiants (I). giants (III). main sequence (V). white dwarfs. Observational HRD may use colour in place of temperature, and magnitude (brightness) in place of luminosity.
E N D
Black-body radiation: Planck distribution (Rayleigh-Jeans, Wien distributions) Wien’s Law Stefan(-Boltzmann) Law
supergiants (I) giants (III) mainsequence (V) whitedwarfs
Observational HRD may use colour in place of temperature, and magnitude (brightness) in place of luminosity
Mid -1968: Davis, Bahcall, Homestake mine experiment - only 1/3 of expected high-energy (PP-II, III) neutrinos found 1989, Kamiokande - only 1/2 of expected high-energy neutrinos Early 1990s, GALLEX, SAGE confirmed absence of low-energy neutrinos (important because dominant) Late 1990s, SuperKamiokande precisely confirmed high-energy deficit of mainly electron neutrinos but with some senitivity to other flavours (muon, tau) 2001 June 18 - Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, bigger deficit the SuperKamiokande, for the same energy electron neutrinos (only) 2002, Davis gets Nobel Prize
The solar neutrino problem: neutrino oscillations [the Mikheyev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein (MSW) effect]
In 1967, two years before his epochal paper with Gribov on solar neutrino oscillations was published, Bruno Pontecorvo wrote: "Unfortunately, the weight of the various thermonuclear reactions in the sun, and the central temperature of the sun are insufficiently well known in order to allow a useful comparison of expected and observed solar neutrinos..." In other words, the uncertainties in the solar model are so largethat they prevent a useful interpretation of solar neutrino measurements.
Bruno Pontecorvo's view was echoed more than two decades later when in 1990 Howard Georgi and Michael Luke wrote as the opening sentences in a paper on possible particle physics effects in solar neutrino experiments: "Most likely, the solar neutrino problem has nothing to do with particle physics. It is a great triumph that astrophysicists are able to predict the number of 8B neutrinos to within a factor of 2 or 3..." C. N. Yang stated on October 11, 2002, a few days after the awarding of the Nobel Prize in Physics to Ray Davis and Masatoshi Koshiba for the first cosmic detection of neutrinos, that: "I did not believe in neutrino oscillations even after Davis' painstaking work and Bahcall's careful analysis. The oscillations were, I believed, uncalled for."
Web page: http :// www.star.ucl.ac.uk/~idh/1B23 Neutrinos: different flavours have different masses Sum of masses: <1eV (?) Differences: O(0.1eV) (?)
The Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram is a plot of • Temperature (colour, spectral type) vs • Luminosity (brightness) • Most (90%) of stars lie on the Main Sequence, where stars • burning hydrogen to helium (proton-proton or CNO cycles) • are in hydrostatic equilbrium • Sun shines through proton-proton reactions, which emit • electron neutrinos • ‘Solar Neutrino Problem’ • discovery of ‘neutrino oscillations, neutrino mass How do stars get on to the main sequence, and what happens afterwards? – stellar evolution
Giant Molecular Clouds: Radii 50 pc Masses 100,000+ solar masses Temp few 10s of K Densities of order 10 molecules per cubic cm (10**20 smaller than the core of a star…) Collapse to from stars, ca. 0.1-100x solar mass
For 1 solar mass: Main Sequence lifetime: 1010 years (ZAMSTAMS) As 4H 1 He, number of particles falls, pressure drops core contracts core temperature rises pressure rises increased luminosity, increased radius (‘Mirror law: shrinking core expanding envelope!) ZAMS NOW Temperature rise = 300K 6% increase in radius
End of core hydrogen burning core cools, pressure decreases Cores shrinks energy deposited in hydrogen burning shell (Kelvin-Helmholtz contraction; core temperature actually increases when fusion stops!) – CNO burning (thin) Luminosity increases, star expands, becomes a Red Giant: burning hydrogen to helium in a shell around a helium core (for about 10% of MS lifetime for a solar-mass star)
supergiants (I) giants (III) mainsequence (V) whitedwarfs
Hydrogen “ash” falls onto core, which contracts, • temperature rises; at 108 K core helium burning • (triple alpha) starts. Degenerate core: • temperature increases but pressure does not! • Helium flash (raises degeneracy) New configuration, core helium burning (+shell hydrogen burning) on the ‘horizontal branch’ (core expands, star contracts), for about 1% of the MS lifetime for a solar-mass star (helium burning goes fast)!
After core helium exhaustion, shell helium burning starts; the star becomes a second type of ‘red giant’: Main Sequence Red Giant Branch Horizontal Branch *Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB) Helium in shell becomes exhausted Overlying hydrogen shell falls back & reignites feeds helium shell, compressed, heated helium shell flash (for degenerate cores) ‘thermal pulse’ Complicated! But result is an unstable star (a pulsating variable) which loses its outer layers
‘Dredge-up’ – convection brings processed material from core • to surface on red-giant branches • First: during shell hydrogen burning • Second: during shell hydrogen burning • (Further dredge-ups possible) • Of some personal significance… • As the outer layers disperse the carbon-oxygen core (left • from core helium burning) is exposed • Planetary Nebula (lifetime ca. 10,000 years, from expansion) + remnant carbon-oxygen white dwarf (electron degenerate)
White dwarf mass-radius relation and the Chandrasekhar Limit
EVOLUTION OF MASSIVE STARS Initial stages (contraction onto MS, core hydrogen burning on MS) broadly similar (Radiation pressure prevents formation of very high masses, >100 solar masses) Higher masses hotter cores; core H burning is through the CNO cycle AND later stages of `burning’ (beyond triple-alpha burning of helium) are possible at later stages of evolution
For stars > 4 solar masses, carbon-oxygen core is more massive than ‘Chandrasekhar limit’ Electron degeneracy can’t support core, so further heating & burning occurs: Carbon burning O, Ne, Na, Mg >8 solar masses, neon burning (109K), then oxygen burning, silicon burning, oxygen burning, silicon burningvarious products (sulfur—iron) Faster and faster!! (C: few hundred years; Si, a day)