1 / 11

Rural income and forest dependence –some evidence from Guatemala

Rural income and forest dependence –some evidence from Guatemala. Pablo Prado CIFOR, 25th March 2009. Context. Montane conifer forests of Central America 2567-3600 m a.s.l. Rain 825 ±125-1141±260 Area approx. 1,000 sqkm 12 villages, 996 hh, sample 271 193147

gferrell
Download Presentation

Rural income and forest dependence –some evidence from Guatemala

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Rural income and forest dependence –some evidence from Guatemala Pablo Prado CIFOR, 25th March 2009

  2. Context • Montane conifer forests of Central America • 2567-3600 m a.s.l. • Rain 825±125-1141±260 • Area approx. 1,000 sqkm • 12 villages, 996 hh, sample 271193147 • 7122 inhabitants, 5 persons/hh

  3. Household income sources

  4. Trends by quarter

  5. Seasonality

  6. Key forest and environmental products

  7. Income composition and poverty

  8. Other patterns • Although very few hhs (8.96%) reported to have used forest productos to weather misfortune, they either did nothing (25.93%), spent cash savings (16.67%), received assitance from friends and relatives (16.67%), harvested more forest products (11.11%), harvested more agricultural products (11.11%) or harvested more wild products from the forest (1.85%).

  9. Other patterns cont´d • No evidence of forest products as stepping stones out of poverty, and very weak correlations between closeness to markets and forest income (DFI and DtM, 0.195; and FDI and DtM, -0.080). • Subsistence peasant economies with irregular market articulations by means of agricultural products.

  10. Policies and overall findings • Regular subsistence users • Interdependence between forest conservation and both subsistence and small scale commercial agriculture • Firewood and leaf litter are the centrepiece for the local subsistence strategies • Income assymetrically ditributed

More Related