570 likes | 579 Views
This presentation provides an overview of the FY15 budget development process, highlighting the constraints and limitations faced by the city. The budget includes no property tax increase and emphasizes cost-saving measures while maintaining essential services. Personnel impacts, including position freezes and reduction-in-force, are also discussed.
E N D
Mission Statement:To provide value added services in a customer friendly, cost efficient and effective manner resulting in a safe and prosperous community
Positive Focus • Honored to work with a progressive, forward thinking and committed Mayor, City Council, Department Directors and dedicated employees
Live Within Our Means…. • By law, NC localities must operate within a balanced budget • It is often said: …in tough times, government should tighten its belt and live within its means • When the City tightens its belt, citizens, customers and employees will inevitably feel the squeeze
FY15 Budget Development • Staff training in August-October on use of new, comprehensive MSExcel buget development workbooks • Departmental budget development from late October to first of January • Constrained, prioritized departmental budget requests submitted to CM first of January
FY15 Budget Development • CM review of budgets with Department Directors in mid-January • Analysis of revenue stream and projections developed in February • Budget balancing during March and April • Work Budget Book prepared April and May
The FY15 Budget is… • Seriously Constrained, particularly the General Fund • A No-Frills Budget
We’ve been in this mode since 1999 • Henderson continues to endure a protracted period of austerity • The FY15 Budget does not have the elasticity and flexibility normally associated with good budgeting • This problem is particularly acute in the General Fund
Total Budget • The Total Budget, adjusted for inter-fund transfers, is: • $37,053,400
Total Budget:Fee/Rate/Tax Increases • No Property Tax Increase • No Sanitation Fee Increase • Regional Water Rate Increase = 5% • Water Rate Increase = 5% • Sewer Rate Increase = 3%
Monthly Utility Impacts on Residential Customer • Customer using about 5,000 gpm • In City—Water = $0.69 increase • In City—Sewer = $1.65 increase • Out of City Water = $1.24 increase • Out of City Sewer = $3.16 increase
Total Budget:Personnel Impacts • No Cost of Living Adjustment • Career Development Continues • Phase 1 of 5-Year Plan to Implement Classification & Pay Plan • Unfreezing Two Positions: • Assistant Finance Director—General Fund • Public Services Director—Water and Sewer funds • Reduction-in-Force of 2 Full-Time & 4 Part-Time Positions • Main Street Director—General Fund • Police Office Assistant—General Fund • Four (4) School Crossing Guards—General Fund • Training for Employee Performance Evaluations for the Supervisory Staff
Pay Plan Implementation • On Average, the City’s compensation for employees is 22.67% less than its peers according to a Fall 2013 market survey done by The MAPS Group • $117,000 is provided across the four funds to provide for Phase 1 implementation (5-year plan)
Medical InsuranceKudos! • Kudos to HR Director Cathy Brown and all employees/retirees that have worked hard to keep costs down • Wellness program working well • Kudos to Phil Burnette, City’s Health Plan Administrator, for negotiating this year’s rate reduction and helping us establish the wellness program 3 years ago
Individual Funds • Now that we’ve taken a look at the global budget issues, let’s look at the four operating funds: • General Fund (governmental) • Regional Water Fund (enterprise) • Water Fund (enterprise) • Sewer Fund (enterprise)
General Fund • Work Horse of all City Budgets • Provides for GENERAL services including • Public Safety: Police, Fire, E-911 • Cultural: Library, Recreation, • Public Health & Welfare: code enforcement, sanitation, Planning/Zoning, transportation • General Administration of City • Archaic revenue structure: Property Tax
General Fund Revenues:Primary Revenue Sources • Primary Revenue Sources • Property Tax: 38% • Sales Taxes: 15% • Sanitation Fee: 12% 65% of fund budget
Property Tax • 38% of General Fund Budget • One of only two significant major revenue sources that is at the discretion of Council • Tax rate is currently 62 cents • No increase in tax rate is recommended
Property Tax Basics • Increases in property tax revenues have come primarily from • 1) MPMC converting from non-profit to public; • 2) tax rate increases in FY10 and 14; • 3) Tax and Tag program for motor vehicle registration • 4) Some limited natural growth • Property Tax Collection Rate for FY13 • 93.59%: Overall • 94.30%: All Property Excluding Motor Vehicles • 85.35%: Motor Vehicles
Sales Taxes A small decline in FY15 due to loss of State Hold-Harmless payments and a lack-luster economy
General Fund:Expenditures Trend Analysis Not keeping pace with inflation
Trend Analysis Part 2 • FY15 less than FY14 and lower than FY09
Where Does the $ Go? • The community and Council have stated public safety is extremely important. Indeed it is! • One needs to understand how much of the General Fund budget is dedicated to Public Safety vis-à-vis all other services
Where Does the $ Go? —Part 2a • Public Safety requires 47% of Fund’s resources
Where Does the $ Go? –Part 2b • Current Year Property Tax Does Not Pay for Costs of Public Safety
Where Does the $ Go? –Part 2c • Public Safety Personnel Costs require 61% of the Fund’s Personnel Resources
Where Does the $ Go? –Part 3a • 26% of General Fund Expenditures are restricted by State Statue, Federal Regulations, Contractual Agreements, Vested Benefits and Inter-Departmental Sales
Where Does the $ Go? – Part 3b • When one considers restricted and public safety expenditures which comprise 67% of the total General Fund, any remaining budget balancing would affect all other departments, which comprise only 33% of the Fund’s budget. Across the board cuts just don’t work. Note: E-911 and Asset Forfeiture expenses are reflected in the Restricted Expenditures for the purposes of this pie chart
General Fund Expenditures:Gaps • Operating expenses are estimated to the bone—extremely limited flexibility • Streets and storm drainage improvements are terribly under funded • Vehicle and equipment replacement is lagging, particularly in Public Services • Employee compensation is lagging
Regional Water Fund:Revenues • 99% of revenues come from the sale of water to the three regional partners: Henderson, 60%, and Warren County and Oxford at 20% each • 5% rate increase to help mitigate revenue losses from reduced consumption and to keep capital reserve contributions at near-projected levels
Regional Water FundMajor Initiatives • Obtain Inter-Basin Transfer of Water Permit to 20mgd that will provide for expansion of plant • Physical Expansion of Plant to 20mgdCapital improvements: Chemical Pit and Clearwell Roof • Continuation of rate stabilization/debt service plan
Water Fund:Revenues • 97% of revenues come from the sale of water to • 8,800+/- customers • Four governmental customers • Vance County 1A comes on-line this year • Granville County not yet active customer • Operates as an Enterprise Fund
Water Fund Revenues:Rate Increase • 5% Rate Increase • Each 1% = about • $26,000
Water Fund:Major Initiatives • Water Meter Replacement Program continues • 2” Line Replacement continues • Rate Stabilization transfers to capital reserve • Re-establish Public Services Director Position
Sewer Fund:Revenues • 91%, from sewer user fee • Operates as an enterprise fund