140 likes | 265 Views
Now You See Them, Now You Don’t! The Role of Part-Time Students and Faculty in Student Engagement. March 3, 2010. TAIR, Waco, TX. CCSSE : Listening to Students. Goal To provide member colleges with results that can be used to inform decision making and target institutional improvements.
E N D
Now You See Them, Now You Don’t! The Role of Part-Time Students and Faculty in Student Engagement • March 3, 2010. TAIR, Waco, TX
CCSSE: Listening to Students • Goal • To provide member colleges with results that can be used to inform decision making and target institutional improvements. • 2009 CCSSE Cohort • 400,000 Students • 663 colleges • 48 states, British Columbia, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Marshall Islands
Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (CCFSSE) • Faculty teaching practices, the ways they spend their professional time both in and out of class, and their perceptions regarding students’ educational experiences • Is aligned with CCSSE to allow colleges to contrast student and faculty perceptions
Who’s in this research? • Texas CCSSE & CCFSSE Classes in 2009 • 32 Colleges • 690 Classes • 8,000 Students • 600 Faculty members
Part-time Isn’t Just about Students • Class Time: Part-time faculty have more part-time students in their classes. • Texas CCSSE & CCFSSE Classes in 2009
Part-time Isn’t Just about Students • Benchmarks: Part-time students from the classes taught by part-time faculty have the lowest benchmarks. • Texas CCSSE & CCFSSE Classes in 2009
Expectations: Students and Faculty • Student Stem: During the current school year, how much has your coursework at this college emphasized the following activities? • Faculty Stem: During the current school year, how much does the coursework in your selected course section emphasize the following mental activities?
5b. Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory 5c. Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences in new ways 5d. Making judgments about the value or soundness of information, arguments, or methods 5e. Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations 5f. Having students use information they have read or heard to perform a new skill 9a. Encouraging students to spend significant amounts of time studying (slightly different stem) Response scale: 1= Very Little, 2 = Some, 3 = Quite a Bit, 4= Very Much Community College Survey of Student Engagement
Expectations: Students vs Faculty • ` He digs down into the details and he’s a rigorous teacher… I thank him for being a rigorous teacher because that helps when I go on. — Male student “I hate it at the moment, but my favorite teachers are always the ass-kickers … I like to be challenged.” — Male student Community College Survey of Student Engagement
Instructor Expectation and Student Engagement Community College Survey of Student Engagement
Instructor Expectations & Student Behaviors Community College Survey of Student Engagement
Discussion • PT students more likely to be taught by PT faculty. • Students appear to perceive that faculty have lower expectations than faculty report • FT students tend to have higher engagement scores, but mixed results with regard to specific behaviors. • Faculty expectations related to student engagement and behaviors. Community College Survey of Student Engagement
Not critical of PT faculty • Institutional environments and procedures that may contribute to the differences between PT and FT faculty. • PT faculty not required to have office hours • PT faculty do not have offices • PT faculty not required to participate in professional development that FT faculty attend • Ask yourself: At my campus is there a group of courses continuously with low passing/completion? Who teaches these courses? Community College Survey of Student Engagement
Contact Information • Mike Bohlig, Ph.D. • Senior Research Associate • 512-232-6456 • bohlig@ccsse.org • Beiyi Cai • Research Associate • cai@ccsse.org • www.ccsse.org Community College Survey of Student Engagement