730 likes | 902 Views
Corso di clinical writing. What to expect today?. Core modules. Introduction General principles Specific techniques Title/Abstract drafting Finding out relevant literature , and Introduction drafting Nuts & bolts of statistics and Methods drafting
E N D
What to expect today? Core modules • Introduction • General principles • Specific techniques • Title/Abstract drafting • Finding out relevantliterature, and Introductiondrafting • Nuts & boltsofstatistics and Methodsdrafting • Practicalsession 1 – Appraisalof a publishedarticle
Resources for finding the literature • Seniors, juniors, and colleagues • Textbooks • Medical journals • World wide web
Whattochoose? or … fast but tough? Simple and easy-going
1st step: framing the question • Population:who are the relevant patients? • Intervention or exposure:what are the management strategies we want to appraise or the relevant harmful exposure we want to study? • Outcome:what are the patient-relevant consequences of the exposure in which we are interested?
2nd step: determiningquestiontype • Therapy:determining the effect of different treatments on improving patient function and avoiding adverse events • Harm:ascertaining the effects of potentially harmful agents on patient function, morbidity, and mortality • Diagnosis:establishing the power of an intervention to differentiate between those with and those without a target condition or disease • Prognosis:estimating the future course of a patient’s disease
1st step: example • All-purposequestion:is laparoscopic surgery for colon cancerbeneficial? • Improved (searchable) question: • Population: patientswith colon cancerwithanindicationtosurgicalresection • Intervention:attempt at laparoscopic resectionof colon cancer • Outcome:cancer-freesurvival, mortality, positive resectionmargins, localrecurrence, wound-siterecurrence, blood loss duringsurgery
2nd step: example • Therapy:whichtechniqueis more effective and safe for thydoidsurgery? • Harm:whatis the riskof positive resectionmarginswith laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer? • Diagnosis:can I recognizewhich CT normallyappearingappendices are inflammed? • Prognosis:can I predictwhichpatientsundergoingmajroabdominalsurgery are more likelytodeveloppulmonarythromboembolism?
WWW resources • BioMedCentral: www.biomedcentral.com • Clinicaltrials.gov: www.clinicaltrials.gov • DARE: www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/crddatabases.htm • EMBASE: www.embase.com • Google scholar:scholar.google.com • Medscape: www.medscape.com • meta RegisterofControlledTrials (mRCT):www.controlled-trials.com/mrct/ • PubMed: www.pubmed.gov • The CochraneLibrary: www.cochrane.org • UpToDate: www.uptodate.com • WebMD: www.webmed.com • Web of Science:isiknowledge.com
WWW resources • BioMedCentral: www.biomedcentral.com • Clinicaltrials.gov: www.clinicaltrials.gov • DARE: www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/crddatabases.htm • EMBASE: www.embase.com • Google scholar:scholar.google.com • Medscape: www.medscape.com • meta RegisterofControlledTrials (mRCT):www.controlled-trials.com/mrct/ • PubMed: www.pubmed.gov • The CochraneLibrary: www.cochrane.org • UpToDate: www.uptodate.com • WebMD: www.webmed.com • Web of Science:isiknowledge.com
BioMedCentral • BioMedCentral is provided by a private UK company (the same that provides mRCT) • It mostly contains open access journals or conference proceedings • It may be a useful and cheap (it’s free!) starting point, but to date its content is limited • In the future however it should vastly expand
Clinicaltrials.gov • Clinicaltrials.govis a comprehensive and free collectionofpast, present and future clinicaltrials • Itcontainsdesigns, objectives, selectioncriteria and enrolment status of the mostimportantclinicaltrialsworldwide • However, itisnotthatcomprehensive (missesmanysmallstudies) and oftenresults are missing
DARE • The Database ofAbstractsofReviewsofEffectivenessisprovided for free by the Universityof York • Itcontainstitles and abstractsofsystematicreviewsofeffectiveness • Each item contained (iesystematicreviews) is a verygoodstartingpointtoget info on a topic • However, some hits are obsolete and no papers on prognosis, diagnosis, or pathophysiology are includedto date
EMBASE • EMBASE is a comprehensivearchiving site, provided for a feebyElsevier • Its scope issimilarbutgreater and largelynon-overlappingwith MEDLINE/PubMed • Itmaybeuseful for sophisticated researchers and systematicreviewers • However, it’s expensive and rarelyneeded, asmostimportantpaperswillbealready in MEDLINE/ PubMed
MEDSCAPE • A freelysurfable website providing disparate content, ownedby the WebMD company • The Surgerysectionisoftenupdated and mayproviderecent data on trials or other news • Itisnotdeveloped or maintainedsystematically, and thuslackscomprehensiveness
mRCT • The meta RegisterofControlledTrialsis a freelysearchable website containing data on registeredtrials • Itisprovidedby the ownerofBioMedCentral • It’s a good source on recent or ongoing (thusunpublished) trials • Whileinteresting for the clinicalresearcher or meta-analyst, its scope islimitedto RCT
PubMed • PubMedis the web (and free) versionof MEDLINE (providedby the US National Libraryof Medicine) • Itcontains data on articlesprintedeveryday in severalthousandsmedicaljournalsaround the world, evenifthereis some biastoward US and English-languagepublications • Itisreasonablycomprehensive and sophisticated, especially for the expert user • Nonetheless, manypapers can stillbemissedby the MEDLINE indexers, and usingPubMedrequires some expertise
PubMed: tips and tricks • There are 4 basicwaystosearchPubMed: • Free text searches • Searcheswithdescriptors(MedicalSubjectHeadings, MeSH) • Clinicalqueries(specificfilters for studies or topics) • Limits(enable the searchertoselectseveralcharacteristics, suchaslanguage, articletype, studytype, and so forth) • The idealsearchcombinesone or more ofsuchinstrumentstoobtain precise and concise answersto the clinicalquestion
Scholar Google • Scholar Google isprovided for free by the Google company • Itcontainscitations and directlinkstoabstracts or full text articles • In addition, itenablescitationanalysis, thusforward and backwardsnowballing • It’s notyetverystructered, and highlyrelevantcitationsmightnotbeincluded or missedbecauseburiedamongthousandsofnon-relevantones
The CochraneCollaboration • The CochraneCollaborationprovidesabstractsofsystematicreviews for free and full texts and additionalservices for a fee • Itcontains the mostrigoroussystematicreviewsavailableto date on treatment • No comprehensivesystematicreviews are yetavailable for othertopics • Manyreviews, whilehighlyvalid and pertinent, mightbeoutdatedbecauseofinfrequentupdates
UpToDate • UpToDateisprovided for a feebyan American company • Itprovides qualitative reviewsofmosttopics, with the specificfeaturesthatreviews are updatedveryfrequently • No strictmethodology for review production or update isenforced • In addition, itmightseemsuperficial and notdetailedenough for expertsof a topic
WebMD • WebMDis a comprehensive website for healthcareprofessional, that can beaccesseduponfeesubscription • Itisrelativelycomprehensivebutunstructured • Resembles (albeitwithlessclinical focus) www.medscape.com, and www.tctmd.com
Web of Science • Provided for anexpensivefeebyThompson-Institute for ScientificIndexing, is the basis for the computationof impact factors and citationindexes • Containstitles and abstractsfromseveralthousandsjournals • In addition, itenablesforward and backwardsnowballing • However, itlacks the comprehensivenessof EMBASE or PubMed
Impact factor • Measureshowmanycitations are received in 2 yearsby a specific journal (times the articlespublishedeveryreferenceyear)