90 likes | 255 Views
Northern Periphery & Arctic Programme : Regional Cooperation in Practice. Dr Irene McMaster Arctic Connections, 10-11 June, Glasgow . Cooperation in practice. Array of cooperation across the region Ever increasing interest in cooperation Cooperation in practice….
E N D
Northern Periphery & Arctic Programme: Regional Cooperation in Practice Dr Irene McMaster Arctic Connections, 10-11 June, Glasgow
Cooperation in practice • Array of cooperation across the region • Ever increasing interest in cooperation • Cooperation in practice…. • Northern Periphery & Arctic Programme 2014-2020 (NPA) • How it has worked in the past… • Planning for 2014-2020… • Considerations for the future…
Northern Periphery Programmes • Built on long-standing transnational cooperation • Article 10 Northern Periphery Programme (1998-2000) • INTERREG IIIB Northern Periphery Programme (2000-2006) • INTERREG IVB Northern Periphery Programme (2007-2013) • INTERREG VB Northern Periphery and Arctic Programme (2014-2020) • Multi-level/multi-actor • EU programme, national government ministries and agencies, regional and local authorities, higher and further education, SMEs • EU Member States and non-Member States • External links with neighbouring regions • Practical and Tangible • Distinct focus on peripherality • Transnational products and services
2014-2020 - living up to the name… • Change of programme name - to include ‘Arctic’…!! • Reflect significant changes in the Programme area • Recognise the policy context operating within (EU, domestic and regional) • Remain relevant to the whole Programme area
Embedding the Arctic • Considered approach • Preparatory project • Evaluation input • Programme planning • Cohesive programme based on shared interests • Arctic embedded throughout the Programme
Promoting Cooperation • Thematic relevance of Programme priorities • Value in practical, regional/locally based cooperation • Programme well-established/trusted • ‘Arctic’ cooperation not exclusive – value in links beyond the Arctic
Looking to the future …. • Considerable scope for collaboration, coordination & cooperation • Dynamic policy environment • Pace of change in the Arctic • Need for resource to monitor change and inform future developments = +