1 / 30

ITPA-IOS Meeting Kyoto 10/2011 Report from ASDEX Upgrade

ITPA-IOS Meeting Kyoto 10/2011 Report from ASDEX Upgrade. Reported by Jörg Stober for the AUG Team. Topics. selected results of the last campaign, related to IOS RMP-coils N 2 -seeding : high power, q 95 = 3 O1 heating of H-modes improved H-mode (advanced inductive)

Download Presentation

ITPA-IOS Meeting Kyoto 10/2011 Report from ASDEX Upgrade

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ITPA-IOS Meeting Kyoto 10/2011 Report from ASDEX Upgrade Reported by Jörg Stober for the AUG Team

  2. Topics • selected results of the last campaign, related to IOS • RMP-coils • N2-seeding : high power, q95 = 3 • O1 heating of H-modes • improved H-mode (advanced inductive) • Issues related to JE, not reported elsewhere • 4.3 nu* scann: plans for next year • 5.2 ICRH • Next campaign: time line and hardware modifications

  3. RMP-coils (Next slides from W. Suttrop, ITPA-PEP) Operation Jan - Jul 2011: 2×4 B-coils (upper and lower rows) n = 2 ELM mitigation n = 1 Error field measurement Shutdown Aug-Dec 2011 Installation of additional 8 upper/lower B-coils Operation Jan 2012 - n = 0, odd/even up/down parity n = 2, row phasing 0,90,180,270 degrees n = 4, odd/even up/down parity Power supplies: — Currently 2 circuits with grid-commutated 2-quadrant converters fmax 20 Hz. — Seeking solution for 4 independent 4-quadrant amplifiers (±1 kA into 500 μH) (n = 3, rotating fields) Full in-vessel coil set: 3 rows, each with 8 saddle coils W Suttrop et al, Fus. Eng. Des. 84 (2009) 209

  4. RMP-coils : no ELMs triggered with pellet fuelling P. Lang

  5. RMP-coils : central densities of 1.6 nGW selected

  6. RMP-coils : no density dependence of E

  7. RMP-coils : DIII-D low-* mitigation not reproduced selected W.Suttrop, T.Evans

  8. RMP-coils : comparison with DIII-D ongoing selected

  9. RMP-coils : summary

  10. High power seeding with peak heatload < 5 MW/m2 Peak load < 5 MW/m2 ! Combined strong D divertor puff, feedback controlled N divertor seeding (q95=3.7, u=0.1, l=0.43) Modelling with B2-Eirene about to start IOS 1.2, A. Kallenbach

  11. q95 = 3 with N2 seeding #26870 Ptot TS PNBI, Prad Te PECRH,X3 snif N2 Ip (MA) D2 MP-coils N IR-Power Div o i H-factor Wmhd ne core Te,div edge

  12. X1 O1-heating of H-modes : polarisation control 105 GHz Bt= 3.2 T „wrong“ X-mode directly reflected O1 1st harm Res X-mode cut-off

  13. 10 5 Sniffer signal (V)  / 4 Power X-mode 4 8 1 7 0 4 % 6 3 1 6 0 2 % 4 2 1 5 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 2 1  / 8 Power X-mode (%) 0 1.5 2.0 2.5 time (s) 158 167 O1-heating of H-modes : polarisation control H-mode, 1 MA, -3.2 T, 105 GHz, #26864 With 1% X-mode content, switch-off level is already exceeded (preliminary, orthogonal scan still to be done)

  14. O1-heating of H-modes: effect of UHR V. Vdovin finds significant effect of UHR for O1 scenario with full wave code. Does he predict measurable effects for AUG ? These could be verified using modulated ECRH and X2-ECE. Preparation on AUG: finalize polarisation control such that X2-ECE can be used (up to 188 GHz) AUG-proposal submitted for 2012 co-authors: V. Vdovin, R. Prater

  15. Access to improved H-mode (advanced inductive)

  16. Improved H-mode: current overshoot selected (J. Hobirk, EPS 2011)

  17. Small differences in density and power waveforms can lead to significant improvement on AUG • Pulse very similar • Slightly less gas and lowertarget density for heating • NBI heating increased to 10MW • βN=4.5 and confinement equivalent to H98y2>2 reached • terminated by strong n=1 mode • Extended ELM-free phase before crash • Also radiation increases strongly before crash (Slide from EPS 2011 talk J. Hobirk)

  18. Improved H-mode: recovery of the pre-W scheme Ip ncore nedge Ptot PRF H98 WMHD 0,div 0,main D2 puff Te0, Ti0 • #20993 : year 2006 • ICRH limiters still graphite • #27056 : year 2011 • All tungsten • ?? days after boronization • Major differences • - replace ICRH by ECRH • wave form gas puff • Already quite close but • ramp-up and H-factor • not fully recovered

  19. IOS 4.3 : nu* scaling of advanced inductive Szenario No dedicated discharges in 2011: try to learn from rho* scan Scaling: I2 = c I1, B2 = c B1, T2 = c2 T1, n2 = n1 *2 = c -4 *1 minimum sensible c = 1.2 yields factor 2 in * Problem (in AUG): n/nGW varies as 1/c, how wide can it be varied? Try to connect to rho* experiment (see C. Challis for JE 4.2), including attempts to rise density.

  20. H98 Wmhd Ip Gas ncore nedge H PNBI PECRH Te #27224 #27052 Gas puff scan in rho*-scan shape and q95 rho*-scan lowest density attempt to increase density

  21. Density profile can only be varied by 1.12 both @ 2.6s #27224 #27052 scaled So far, good match of shape

  22. ECRH scheme used : compensated toroidal lauch pECRH jECCD

  23. Torbeam: Poor absorption for n2 = 1.15 n1

  24. Proposed solution: increase q95, Bt by 5% Allows smaller tor. injection angle, simulation with n = 1.2 nrho*

  25. The high Ip, Bt case can be heated on low field side

  26. Reasonable agreement of ECRH power deposition high * case q95 = 4.4 Bt = 2.37 T Ip = 0.93 MA ne0 = 10.3 x 1019 m -3 rho* case, #27224 q95 = 4.2 Bt = 2.26 T Ip = 0.93 MA ne0 = 8.6 x 1019 m -3 low * case q95 = 4.4 Bt = 2.85 T Ip = 1.12 MA ne0 = 10.3 x 1019 m -3

  27. IOS-4.3 : AUG-Proposal for 2012 • - repeat rho* pulse with 5% higher Bt and modified ECRH angles • increase density by 20% • increase Bt and Ip by 20% • adjust gas puff and power to match scaling requirements • 5-10 shots depending on number of iterations • May still be modified after this meeting

  28. IOS-5.2 : ICRH gas puff Increase of AUG ICRF antenna loading by local gas injection Old results: if gas injected locally, antenna loading is significantly higher (doubled in our case) [Ph. Jacquet, V. Bobkov et al., to be submitted to NF] No experiments done in 2011: restrictions in infrastructure of antenna gas injection which was transfered to another antenna 2012: new infrastructure, measure the local effect in large type I-ELMy plasmas, check loading depence on RF power at low power V. Bobkov

  29. AUG : Hardware upgrades and time line 2012 • Number of RMP coils doubled, allows n=4 perturbation • Power supplies to rotate perturbation delayed (no pref. funding) • Design of 8 mid-plane coils ready, but no preferential EU funding • Limiters of ICRH antenae will be partially boron-coated • New antenna design with reduced stray field ready, • Financing unclear, coop with Italy and/or China • 1 additional ECRH unit (1 MW) in spring 2012 • Total power in plasma at 140 GHz close to 5 MW • Restart January 2012 • End of campaign November 2012 • 6 weeks without operation in August / September

  30. AUG : ICRH Upgrades 2012: two antennas with B-coated side limiters to make operation easier After 2012: two new 3-strap antennas for better compatibility with W wall (V. Bobkov et al.)

More Related