Por uma agenda espacial latino-americana – a visão do INPE

1. Por uma agenda espacial latino-americana – a visão do INPE Dr. João Vianei Soares Diretor de Observação da Terra

2. Por uma agenda espacial latino-americana – a visão do INPE • INPE/MCT como instituição de estado segue a orientação do estado (MRE, ABC, CNPq, CAPES...)

3. estratégia visão Plano de longo prazo Uma imagem inspiradora objetivos missão Objetivos estratégicos de alto nível Uma descrição ideal de como Pretendemos chegar lá Tarefas prioritárias O que faremos e quais os resultados esperados para atingir os objetivos num dado tempo benefícios resultados Vantagens para a sociedade Métrica de indicadores

4. Por uma agenda espacial latino-americana – a visão do INPE • Capacitação (infra-estrutura, institucional e treinamento e educação) • CRECTEALC (Centro Regional em Ciência e Tecnologia Espaciais para a América Latina http://www.inpe.br/unidades/cep/atividadescep/crectealc/) • Pós-Graduação em Sensoriamento Remoto • Treinamento e difusão (Spring, Terralib, Terraview) • Teleducação (e-learning) • Política de dados CBERS (expansão ? Cotopaxi? CB em infra-estrutura? Institucional?) • GEOSS (representação no ExCom) • EOPA (operação do GOES-10) • CEOS SIT constelação de satélites

5. Por uma agenda espacial latino-americana – a visão do INPE • CB-07-P4: Open Source Software (OSS) • Encourage the development and use of open source solutions across/along the Earth observation value chain through: §         Developing an inventory of possible OSS solutions that could be used within GEO. Making this inventory and identified solutions available through the GEO portal. §         Building on existing efforts and drawing on networks of OSS (and other) developers to stimulate OSS and other value chain related  projects that  foster the development of local technical skills for software production. §         As a starting point TerraView and Terralib will be used to  encourage the development of open source software for end users dealing with integrated Earth observation and GIS data.

6. GEO and GEOSS Workshop on Capacity Building, São José dos Campos

7. Importance of Earth Observation Data • Flooding in Europe, Earthquake in Pakistan, Indian Ocean Tsunami, Katrina, and other natural disasters • Climate change, biodiversity conservation, threat to property WaterLand Neeltje Jans Museum courtesy Environmental Agency courtesy Reuters

8. GEO and GEOSS……. • GEO= Many People = Group on Earth Observations • GEOSS = One Vision = Establish a global, coordinated, comprehensive and sustained system of Earth observing systems

9. Recommendation from WSSD, Johannesburg, 2002 “Strengthen cooperation and coordination among global observing systems and research programmes for integrated global observations, taking into account the need for building capacity and sharing of data from ground-based observations, satellite remote sensing and other sources among all countries”

10. GEOSS should answer Society’s need for • Better Earth Observations • Easier & More Open Data Access • Informed Decision Making

11. EOS I • EOS I • July 31, 2003, Washington, D.C. • 34 Countries and 20 International Organizations • EOS II • April 25, 2004, Tokyo, Japan • 47 Countries and 26 International Organizations • EOS III • February 2005, Brussels • Nearly 60 Countries, EC and over 40 International Organizations EOS II EOS III

12. 10-year Implementation Plan • Accompanying reference document Secretariat hosted by WMO

13. GEOSS: • Here to promote data sharing for earth observations • Here to promote interagency, intergovernmental, and interdisciplinary collaboration • Here to encourage sharing infrastructure • Here to inform the decision makers what needs to be done and to build the political will to make it happen.

14. GEOSS will serve 9 Societal Benefit Areas 1. Prevention/Reduction of effects of disasters 2. Human Health and Epidemiology 3. Energy Management 4. Climate Change 5. Water Management 6. Weather Forecasting 7. Ecosystems 8. Agriculture 9. Biodiversity

15. Five Transverse Areas 1. Architecture 2. Data Management 3. User Engagement 4. Capacity Building 5. Outreach

16. Why a Transverse Approach ?Same observations are often relevant to manySocietal Benefit Areas (e.g., Altimetry)

17. Why a Transverse Approach ?Many are interdependent (e.g., Weather-Disasters Climate-Agriculture-Health Water-Energy)

18. El Niño consequences at global scale Forest fires in IndonesiaFloods in California

19. Choléra 2002 © Risk of Re-emergence of Infectious Diseases Some in connection with El Niño/La Niña events Dengue Meningitus

20. GEO Plenary Executive Committee Guidance and Participation Implementation Guidance Oversight Leadership StandingCommittees GEO Secretariat Director Management and Coordination Team Scientific Experts Coordination & Facilitation Capacity Building Architecture & Data Advice & Recommendations Science & Technology User Interface Inputs Expert Communities Coordination Dialogue GEO Organization

21. Executive Committee • 12 Members • Regional representation • Africa(2) : Morocco and South Africa • Americas(3): Brazil, Honduras, USA • CIS: Russia • Asia(3): China, Japan and Thailand • Europe(3): EC, Germany and Italy • 4 co-Chairs: EC, USA, China and South Africa

22. Capacity Building • Objectives: develop (through a global partnership) human, scientific, technological, and institutional resources and capabilities across the nine Societal Benefit Areas. • Main Themes • Earth observation infrastructure (particularly in developing countries) • Institutional capacities and • Education and training.

23. http://earthobservations.org GEOSS IS: Comprehensive Coordinated Sustained