• 130 likes • 177 Views
Meta-ethics. Section 5 Naturalism & Non-naturalism. Naturalism & Non-naturalism. Theories that aspire to supply the basis for the moral truths claimed by moral realism & the moral knowledge claimed to be possible by moral cognitivism. Non-naturalism.
E N D
Meta-ethics Section 5 Naturalism & Non-naturalism
Naturalism & Non-naturalism • Theories that aspire to supply the basis for the moral truths claimed by moral realism & the moral knowledge claimed to be possible by moral cognitivism.
Non-naturalism • Moral truths can be known not by reasoning from definitions or experience but intuitively. • Hard to see how such truths could be learned.
Ethical Naturalism • Moral truths result from & are underpinned by natural facts, & the relevant facts are necessarily connected to the corresponding ethical truths & constitute them.
Ontological naturalism: general metaphysical thesis about the nature of facts. Methodological naturalism: concerns how we may properly investigate them. Distinct From…
Ontological & Methodological Naturalism • Both are consistent with ethical naturalism where they grant that moral propositions can be underpinned by natural facts (supervenience).
Restrictive Versions • Restrictive versions of both these kinds of naturalism hold that there are no facts about desirability, rightness or reasons for action. • Conflict with ethical naturalism. • Moral realists need to reject these versions.
Non-naturalism: regards the supervenience of ethical truths on natural ones as mysterious. Naturalism: (certain) natural truths constitute ethical ones. Necessarily related. Can Natural Facts Constitute Ethical Ones?
What Kind of Facts are Relevant? • Philippa Foot — facts about causing harm are necessarily related to ethical conclusions. • Other examples include facts about animal suffering & welfare.
Further Examples • John Searle — facts about words spoken can generate obligations, in the context of human institutions. • Obligations to keep promises. • Implicit benefits to human welfare of (some) institutions make the related obligations moral ones.
Think About… • ways of reasoning from empirical facts to moral conclusions.
Non-naturalism V Restrictive Forms • Non-naturalism is attractive when naturalism is interpreted in restrictive forms (since the latter preclude ethical truths). • But ethical naturalists need not endorse restrictive interpretations.
Ethical Naturalism • Coheres with the accounts of ‘oughts’, moral motivation & moral goodness presented in the other Sections of this Chapter. • Coheres with the accounts of intrinsic value, rightness & moral obligation presented elsewhere in the book.