1 / 28

Broken Arrow Public Schools District Assessment/Accountability Report October 25, 2010

Broken Arrow Public Schools District Assessment/Accountability Report October 25, 2010. Student Groups. All Students Regular Education Students Black American Indian Hispanic Asian White Other Economically Disadvantaged English Language Learners (ELL)

ginger
Download Presentation

Broken Arrow Public Schools District Assessment/Accountability Report October 25, 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Broken Arrow Public Schools District Assessment/Accountability Report October 25, 2010

  2. Student Groups • All Students • Regular Education Students • Black • American Indian • Hispanic • Asian • White • Other • Economically Disadvantaged • English Language Learners (ELL) • Students with Individualized Education Programs (IEP)

  3. API Point Contributions for Elementary and Middle Schools 10% 90%

  4. API Point Contributions for High Schools 80% 10% 10%

  5. Changing Standards

  6. Standards Raised for State Testing Program • The SDE approved more rigorous standards for 3-8th grade math and reading students in 2008-09. • Raised the bar for determining success • “CUT SCORES” were increased • Aligned proficiency levels closer to NAEP • Math and reading scores declined statewide • The new standards were used to determine API and AYP beginning with the 2009-10 school year.

  7. Community Group • Broken Arrow • Edmond • Lawton • Moore • Norman • Putnam City • Union

  8. Community Group Comparison: 3rd Grade 2009-10

  9. Community Group Comparison: 4th Grade 2009-10

  10. Community Group Comparison: 5th Grade2009-10

  11. Community Group Comparison: 5th Grade2009-10

  12. Community Group Comparison: 6th Grade 2009-10

  13. Community Group Comparison: 7th Grade2009-10

  14. Community Group Comparison: 8th Grade2009-10

  15. Community Group Comparison: 8th Grade2009-10

  16. District Testing Highlights: 2009-10 • 5th grade • Social Studies…highest score (tied) since 2001-02 • Writing…5 consecutive years with no score lower than 91% proficient • Science…5 consecutive years with scores at 93% or higher 8th grade • Science…7 consecutive years with scores at or above 90% proficient • U.S. History…2nd highest score since 2001-02 • Writing…highest score (98%) since 2001-02

  17. Community Group Comparison: EOI2009-10

  18. Community Group Comparison: EOI2009-10

  19. Community Group Comparison: EOI2009-10

  20. Community Group Comparison: EOI2009-10

  21. District Testing Highlights: 2009-10 • End-of-Instruction • Geometry…highest score during three years of state testing • English II…highest score since testing began in 2000-01 • English III…tied the highest score during three years of state testing • Biology I…highest score since testing began in 2002-03 • U.S. History…tied the highest score over the last 10 years

  22. Challenges: Non-proficient CRT population: “All Students” FAY/NFAY

  23. Challenges: Non-proficient EOI population: “All Students” FAY/NFAY

  24. EOI “cut score” Challenges

More Related