260 likes | 399 Views
SUPERSITES COORDINATION WORKSHOP Brussels, Belgium 2013 June 10-11. Implementation of Multi-disciplinary Interoperability Infrastructure and contribution to GEO/GEOSS Stefano Nativi MED-SUV, National Research Council of Italy (CNR-IIA ) .
E N D
SUPERSITES COORDINATION WORKSHOP Brussels,Belgium 2013 June 10-11 Implementation of Multi-disciplinary Interoperability Infrastructure and contribution to GEO/GEOSS Stefano Nativi MED-SUV, National Research Council of Italy (CNR-IIA)
Multi-disciplinary and Multi-organizational Infrastructure • Interoperabilityacrossheterogeneous (disciplinary) realms • DifferentSocietal Benefit Areas • Diverse Communities of Practice • Interoperability (types/levels)across heterogeneous organizations (i.e. Systems, Capacities, Networks, ….) • Differentmaturitylevel Disciplines
Natural Risks CoP e-Infrastructure SysmologyCoP infrastructure Service Consumer Service Consumer Service Consumer Service Consumer Service Consumer Service Consumer Solid Earth Geophysics Domain Natural Risks Domain Seismology Domain Solid Earth Geophysics CoP e-Infrastructure Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider … an ecosystem of Communities & Capacities Service Provider Service Provider Service Consumer Service Consumer Volcanology Service Bus VulanologyCoP Infrastructure Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider
How to pursueInteroperability? • Two main (complementary) approaches • Systems Federation(i.e. Standardization) • Controlled and mature environments • System Brokering (i.e. Mediation) • Complex and rapidly-evolving environments Standard model My Data Model • My Data Model • My Data Model • My Data Model
How to pursueInteroperability? • The proposedsolution: • DefineCoPFederations(i.e. CoPStandards) • BrokerCoPFederations (i.e. StandardsMediation) … . • My Data Model • My Data Model Standard model My Data Model • My Data Model • My Data Model • My Data Model
DefineCoP/Domain InfrastructureService Bus • Best practices • Data policy • Security • …. • Discovery protocol(s)/interface(s) • Access protocol(s)/interface(s) • Visualization protocol(s)/interface(s) • Semantic protocol(s)/interface(s) • … • Metadata model(s) • Data Model(s) • Encoding Format(s)/Language(s) • Controlled Vocabulary(ies) • ….
CoPSystem/Infrastructure • Best practices • Data policy • …. Service Consumer Service Consumer CoPService Bus … new advanced technologies & Standards are coming … Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider • Discovery protocol(s)/interface(s) • Access protocol(s)/interface(s) • Visualization protocol(s)/interface(s) • Semantic protocol(s)/interface(s) • … Metadata model(s) Data Model(s) Encoding Format(s)/Language(s) Controlled Vocabulary(ies) ….
BrokerCoP Service Buses BrokeringInfrastructure Realize a Community of Communities Applying the Systems of Systems (Network of Networks) Principles
System of Systems (Network of Networks) principles • Buildon existing (disciplinary) system/network infrastructures (i.e. Universes and Planets) • Supplement but not supplant system/network (i.e. Community) mandates and governance arrangements • Addressheterogeneityto lowerentry barriers avoidingto impose any common (federal) technology • Be flexible and extensible to • Interconnect newsystem/network (Community) infrastructures • Sustainand advance the achieved interoperability • Alloweach system/network (i.e. Community) infrastructure to evolve
Brokering Benefits • Lowers barriers to participation in distributed systems for both users and resource providers • minimal burden or cost impact on existing systems; • Acceleratesinterconnection of disparate systems; • Facilitates sustainability, reusability, extensibility, and flexibility of the infrastructure • Enhances multi-disciplinary interoperability via introduction of new capabilities across multiple domains; • Removes need to impose common (e.g. federal, “top-down”) specifications and software components enabling a more adaptive “bottom-up” evolution of the infrastructure
GEO Web Portal Brokeringservices Semantic assets Community Portals GCI GEODAB CoP Service Buses . .. . .. Community Systems, Capacities, Networks, and Infrastructures: e.g. Geo CHC, CWIC, GENESI-DEC, GBIF, GCMD, SeaDataNet, OneGeology, .. EO Data and Catalogs Services and SW Applications
Broker types (GEO DAB) GEO DAB: production GEO DAB: test Discovery Broker Access Broker Semantic Broker Business Process Broker Quality Broker Policy Brokers
SeaDataNet SAEOS INPE OneGeology CWIC GENESI-DEC EEA-SDI EuroGEOSS EnviroGRIDS/WaterML PANGAEA Clearinghouse WIS NASA GCMD/IDN GBIF NASA GSFC-DAAC IODE Citizen Oservatory Big Data Platform Supersite Infrastructures
Community/Citizen Portals
About20 brokerablecapacities/systems/Communities • More than15 Millionresources • More than1.2 millionare GEOSS Data Core • About 400,000 requests per year
Proof of Concept: NSF Earth Cube pilot • IRIS • Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology • UNAVCO • Non-profit university-governed consortium, facilitates geoscience research and education using geodesy • NOAA • NODC (National Oceanographic Data Center)
Thankyou ! Questions? stefano.nativi@cnr.it