1 / 8

J . Donald Cossairt Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia, IL

Posting of Accelerator Enclosures Presented at the DOE Accelerator Safety Workshop held at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, August 2010. J . Donald Cossairt Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia, IL Operated by Fermi Research Alliance, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11359

giulio
Download Presentation

J . Donald Cossairt Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia, IL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Posting of Accelerator EnclosuresPresented at the DOE Accelerator Safety Workshop held at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, August 2010 J. Donald Cossairt Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia, IL Operated by Fermi Research Alliance, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11359 with the United States Department of Energy.

  2. Fermilab Posting Philosophy 10 CFR 835 Requirements • 835.2 Definitions: Those of all “Areas” [e.g., Radioactive Material, Radiation, High Radiation (HRA), Very High Radiation (VHRA)] say, “…any area accessible to individuals…” • 835.502 gives a menu of physical controls for entering HRAs and VHRAs – controls certainly appropriate if such areas are actually entered. • 835.603 gives standardized postings for “Areas” • 835.604 gives exceptions - We view all, especially “the less than 8 continuous hour” one, as inappropriate for prompt radiation hazards at accelerators when applied to potential VHRAs.

  3. Fermilab Posting Philosophy Guidance Documents DOE G 420.2-1 Chapter II, Section B.3.2: “ii. An exclusion area is an area that is locked and interlocked to prevent personnel access while the beam is on. A fully enclosed and interlocked area is considered inaccessible.” We believe this to be valid. DOE G 441.1-1C • Definitions:“Occupied (occupiable) area: An area or location that may be physically accessible by individuals (or body parts thereof) while a radiation-generating device is in operation.”We believe that this does NOT describe accelerator areas as occupiablewhere access is excluded by interlocks, etc.

  4. Fermilab Posting Philosophy Guidance Documents DOE G 441.1-1C • 12.2.4 Accessibility “Radiological areas and radioactive material areas are defined based upon area accessibility. An area is considered to be accessible to individuals when it contains entrance or access points of sufficient size to permit human entry, i.e., such that any portion of the body may be exposed to the radiological hazard.” “Areas with entrance or access points consisting of locked doors or other controls and interlocks (including those specified under 10 CFR 835.502), should be considered accessible to individuals…”

  5. Fermilab Posting Philosophy Guidance Documents DOE G 441.1-1C 7.4.1.0 Accelerators “…Although the basic radiological control program requirements discussed in this Guide are generally applicable to the large multi-purpose research accelerators, the complexities associated with these facilities may require additional consideration beyond the scope of this Guide. Additional requirements for those RGDs with particle energies exceeding 10 MeV are provided in DOE O 420.2B, Safety of Accelerator Facilities…” G441.1-1C specifically refers back to O420.2B and by implication its associated Guide, for “large accelerators”.

  6. Fermilab Posting Philosophy Fermilab practice Fermilab Radiological Control Manual Article 232.2e: “Accelerator/beamline enclosures to which personnel access is excluded during operations by the radiation safety interlock system are posted for the radiological conditions anticipated when the beam is off and personnel access is permitted.”

  7. Fermilab Posting Philosophy Fermilab practice All areas with primary proton beam areas are posted HRA, the levels seen when people enter. Most secondary beam areas are posted HRA, a few are RA None are accessed beam-on. PERIOD – no exceptions! Access to these exclusion areas is ALWAYS prevented using locked doors/gates & hard wired, tested interlocks. These features are covered by the SAD/ASE (O420.2b). No administrative controls; signs, rope-offs, etc. are ever used for this purpose. Any beam-off accessible areas > 500 rads/hr including those within exclusion areas ARE posted VHRA with access controlled in compliance with 10 CFR 835.

  8. Fermilab Posting Philosophy Additional rationale at Fermilab • Tremendous efforts are made to make access impossible, hence “inaccessible”. • “Robust” interlocks are designed to consensus standards. • Search and Secure procedures (“sweeps”) assure clearance of personnel before beam startup. • Reserve VHRA signage for instances when there is real exposure potential to those dangerous levels. • Want people to SEE VHRA signs when hazard is real! • Door signs also identify other hazards (e.g., electrical, cryogenic, ODH). Don’t want people to miss those!

More Related