110 likes | 248 Views
Project Status Update Carlos Díaz, FIMIM. Project status in previous meeting. PAR. Coord. & manag. Evaluation. PMR. D20. D22. D23. D24. D27. Final. D21. Tools usage & monitoring. Implementation of Action Plan, outreach. D28.
E N D
Project Status Update Carlos Díaz, FIMIM
Project status in previous meeting PAR Coord. & manag. Evaluation PMR D20 D22 D23 D24 D27 Final D21 Tools usage & monitoring Implementation of Action Plan, outreach D28 Implementation of Action Plan, TCs, SE, Mobility, evaluation D29 Ongoing update of SOA, gaps, training materials D25 Selected developments, INFORMA pilot Ongoing update of SOA, gaps, training materials D26 Selected developments Implementation of Work plans, evaluation, integration b/w pilots D30 10th CM
Current project status PAR Coord. & manag. Evaluation PMR D20 D22 D23 D24 D27 Final D21 Tools usage & monitoring Implementation of Action Plan, outreach D28 Implementation of Action Plan, TCs, SE, Mobility, evaluation D29 Ongoing update of SOA, gaps, training materials D25 Selected developments, INFORMA pilot Ongoing update of SOA, gaps, training materials D26 Selected developments Implementation of Work plans, evaluation, integration b/w pilots D30 11th CM
Highlights since last meeting • Drafts of final deliverables for all WPs refined. • Provide objective measurement of the success and usefulness of training activities. • Provide information on impact of the journals publishing INFOBIOMED articles. • New versions of the SoA deliverables should explicitly identify gaps and propose lines of action. • Deliverable review procedures initiated. • Several dissemination activities, including initial organisation of the International Symposium in Jun’07. This has been a cross-project event (INFOBIOMED, SEMANTIC MINING, ACGT, EURESIST, LOCCANDIA, HEALTHAGENTS, @NEURIST). • Completion of pilot applications, some work on evaluation.
Review of deliverables • Formal peer-review procedure • Partners have been assigned to deliverables: • D25: FORTH, UAVR, HHUD, IMIM • D26: UPM, ISCIII, CUSTODIX, UAVR, HHUD, IMIM, FORTH (int) • D28: HNPCC, ACTA, INFORMA, HHUD, FIMIM • D29: UEDIN, AZ, HHUD, FIMIM • D30: FUNEN, ERASMUS, ULEICS, HHUD, IMIM
Review of deliverables • D30 has suffered from delay derived from inputs from pilot applications. • This is the main official report of the work done by the pilots. • It’s where all technical and scientific details must be included (progress reports only offer summarised versions). • Pilot 6.2 has reported a comprehensive view. • More details are missing from 6.1, 6.3 and 6.4. • Please accelerate the production of the reports and send them urgently to ISCIII. Reports must be comprehensive. • The review procedure might be anyway initiated with the current D30 version (v4).
Final reports • We will need to deliver: • Technical and financial reports for the last period (last 1,5 years). • Remember to answer any requests for clarification issued by the EC in relation with the 2nd year financial reporting. • Final reports: • Final plan for using and disseminating knowledge • Final management report • Final report on the distribution of EC contribution • Final science and society questionnaire • Final report on implementation of gender action plan • Final questionnaire on workforce statistics • Final socio-economic questionnaire • WE WILL NEED YOUR INPUT!
Final messages • Immediate focus will be now on: • Completion of work as needed • Formal review process for deliverables, second rounds • Final reporting • Prepare for the final review • Therefore, during this meeting: • Work undertaken and final results obtained by each WP have to be clear. • Work yet to be done have to be pinpointed. • Extra work that was associated with contingency money granted has to be highlighted.
Final review • We must urgently decide on dates: • 23 + 24 Sep • 27 + 28 Sep • An attempt will be made to allow as many partners as possible to attend the final review. • From last review: • “The pilots have progressed, although it is not fully clear the degree of fulfilment of the expectations at this point and the likelihood of a successful completion. Pilots are a key achievement meant to demonstrate the usefulness of the BMI approach to specific real-life cases.” • “The other components of the Training Programme are very interesting, although they require an assessment of their acceptance and usefulness (brokerage, BMI courses database...)” • “New versions of the 'living' SoA deliverables should explicitly identify gaps and propose lines of action.” • “Re-organise budget to ensure that essential tasks (mainly linked to pilots) do have sufficient budget.” • “Provide information on impact of the journals publishing INFOBIOMED articles.”