140 likes | 264 Views
Public Private Partnership in Small and Middle-Size Social Real Estate Projects. Juuso Hietanen NCC Real Estate ProEstate 2009, 04/09/2009. Some of PPP Projects by NCC. South-West Waste Water Treatment Plant (SWTP), St. Petersburg, Russia
E N D
Public Private Partnership in Small and Middle-Size Social Real Estate Projects Juuso Hietanen NCC Real Estate ProEstate 2009, 04/09/2009
Some of PPP Projects by NCC • South-West Waste Water Treatment Plant (SWTP), St. Petersburg, Russia • Arlanda Railway–connection between airport and downtown Stockholm, Sweden • A2 Motorway, Poland • Norrortsleden road project, Sweden • 4 schools in Espoo, Finland • 3 healthcare centres in Vantaa and Espoo, Finland NCC’s advantages: • Significant experience in PPP projects • Eko-concept and EstiModel – know-how successfully applied • Increasing amount of offering from NCC
South-West Waste Water Treatment PlantSaint Petersburg, Russia
Arlanda RailwayAirport-Downtown Connection, Stockholm, Sweden
Contractual Structure of PPP Project Contract for call option of Real Estate Company Ownership • Tenancy Agreement • Asset rental charge • Service charge • Real estate maintenance charge Owner Real Estate Company Public Corporation Loan Contract Facility Management Contracts Lender Maintenance Agreement Management Agreement Contract Agreement FMCompanies • Bank • Insurance company • Pension fund • etc. Bidding, coordination, control
PPP Principles • Selection criteria • Prices of investment period and service period (NPV) • Quality of the design and services • Offering period usually 0,5-1 year • Offering costs and procedure very heavy for companies • Municipals continue negotiations possibly with 1-2 participants after competition • Package projects • Fair risk distribution • Municipals do not provide securities for financing
Key Attributes of a Successful PPP • Authorities must have: • strong will to proceed • knowledge of what they want • knowledge of their limitations • Reliability and stability of partners (long-term liabilities) • Exit only with pre-agreed terms • Reasonable security arrangements for the project company • Interaction between the parties in the beginning to find the best solutions: • Fair distribution of risks • Flexibility, due to: • Authorities different situations • Market situation • Capability of contracting company
Needed Improvements • Interaction needed from beginning • Risk division in correct way, balanced risks • Clear offering terms • Selection criteria: • for project company • for partners • Discussion point: how to compensate offering expenses • Securities from municipals for financing
Conclusions • Points to discuss with authorities in order to proceed: • Willingness and readiness • Asset position • Risk division • Exit terms • Securities • Risk management (currency, inflation, etc.)