1 / 24

The Terminalization of Supply Chains: North American and European Perspectives

The Terminalization of Supply Chains: North American and European Perspectives. Theo NOTTEBOOM Institute of Transport and Maritime Management Antwerp (ITMMA), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium Jean-Paul RODRIGUE Department of Economics & Geography

gladys
Download Presentation

The Terminalization of Supply Chains: North American and European Perspectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Terminalization of Supply Chains:North American and European Perspectives Theo NOTTEBOOM Institute of Transport and Maritime Management Antwerp (ITMMA), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium Jean-Paul RODRIGUE Department of Economics & Geography Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York 11549, USA

  2. The Terminalization of Supply Chains • North America: The Corridor Effect • Europe: The Gateway Effect • Comparative Logistics: Terminalization and the Move Inland

  3. A. North America • Gateways and Corridors • The Rail Transportation Question

  4. Imports and Exports at Selected US Gateways, 2005

  5. Main North American Trade Corridors and Metropolitan Freight Centers

  6. Alameda Corridor CBD UP & BNSF Railyards UP & BNSF Railyards Thruport Mid-CorridorTrench (10 miles) Port of Los Angeles Port of Long Beach Port of Long Beach Port of Los Angeles Port Cluster

  7. The Extended Gateway of the Ports of Los Angeles / Long Beach Intra-terminal Non-local destination On-dock rail yards 16% Alameda Corridor Near-dock rail yards Non-local destination 13% Marine Terminal Rail Non-local destination Off-dock rail yards 13% Non-local destination Off-dock rail yards Transload facility 22% Warehouse Transload facility Local destination 34% Warehouse Non-local destination 2% Truck

  8. North American Rail System

  9. Major Rail Corridors Improved since 2000

  10. Average Speed of Class I Railroads, 1945-2004

  11. Average Freight Train Length, United States

  12. Container Dwell Times at BNSF Rail Terminals

  13. BNSF’s Three Tier Terminal System, 2007

  14. Automated Transfer Management System for Truck-Rail Transfers

  15. B. Europe

  16. Average Dwell Times at Major European Container Terminals (in days)

  17. Case studies Europe – Rhine-Scheldt Delta Container transferium Extended gate (satellite) Initiated by POR TCT Venlo Extended gate (rail-based) for ECT/HPH

  18. Container transferium

  19. TCT Venlo – extended gate of ECT/HPH

  20. Examples of cases • JVC Belgium + TCT Belgium: extended DC for JVC, extended gate for ECT • Four day rule • Free time Rotterdam = 5 days • Free time TCT Belgium = 21 days • Full containers at TCT = part of stock to JVC Belgium

  21. Source: Flanders Institute for Logistics

  22. Logistics clusters in the province of Limburg (region of Flanders, Belgium) Source: BCI, 2007

  23. Node typology in the province of Limburg (region of Flanders, Belgium) Source: BCI, 2007

  24. C. Comparative Logistics: Inland Terminals and the Move Inland • What are the main differences and similarities? • Differences: • Modes (Truck/Rail vs. Truck/Barge). • Ownership (Private vs. Public/Private). • Similarities: • Function (import based). • Is there a distinct North American (or European) terminalization? • Due to externalities (congestion, environment) Europe shows a more advanced terminalization. • Dwell time pressures indicate a more constraining terminalization in North America.

More Related