300 likes | 456 Views
Aquaculture in the West: A WRAC Perspective (and other stuff too). Gary Fornshell University of Idaho Extension. Introduction. WRAC trout research US trout industry Seafood USTFA. Ron Hardy. WRAC Trout Research. Phosphorus reduction Immunological mechanisms of rainbow trout Live haul
E N D
Aquaculture in the West: A WRAC Perspective (and other stuff too) Gary Fornshell University of Idaho Extension
Introduction • WRAC trout research • US trout industry • Seafood • USTFA Ron Hardy
WRAC Trout Research • Phosphorus reduction • Immunological mechanisms of rainbow trout • Live haul • Cutthroat trout • Proposed projects Ron Hardy
Phosphorus Reduction • Shulin Chen, Kevin Fitzsimmons, Raul Piedrahita, Ron Hardy, Rick Barrows, John Colt, Gary Fornshell • Investigate the fate of P and solids between point of particle introduction and the point of removal Ron Hardy
Effluent P Characteristics • Overall mean P concentrations • TP 0.09 ± 0.01 mg/L • SP 0.04 ± 0.01 mg/L • DP 0.06 ± 0.01 mg/L • Percent P by mass • 3.40 ± 1.08% of TSS • no statistical difference per particle size class • Percent SP/DP in discharge • SP 40% • DP 60%
Effluent TSS Characteristics • Median volumetrically weighted effluentparticle size of 250 microns • 76% of particles discharged > 105microns • Mean solids settling velocities were 0.16 cm/s and 2.31 cm/s for particles smallerand larger than 814 microns, respectively
Phosphorus Partitioning • Differences in effluent phosphorus partitioning seen between these two sites • Site 2 lower cleaning frequency and corresponding longer particle residence times • Site 4 higher cleaning frequency and lower particle residence times • Illustrates importance of particle residence times and transport as related to phosphorus effluent characteristics P Partitioning Site2 Dissolved Solid Site 4
What Does This Mean? • Results suggest removal of effluent particles > 100 microns could result in about a 20% reduction of total phosphorus • This may determine whether you’re in or out of compliance
Immunological Mechanisms of RBT • Develop assays to quantify specific immune responses • Effects of hatchery practices on immune function • Assess immune response followed by a novel method of mass immunization
Live Haul: Maintaining Healthy Fish • Objective of this research is to improve fish health and survival of transported fish • Includes tilapia and trout • Formulate hauling criteria for long-haul conditions
Starter Diets & Culture Conditions Cutthroat Trout & Gila Trout Chris Myrick
Chris Myrick – CSU Ken Cline – Cline Trout Farms Greg Kindschi – Bozeman Fish Technology Center John Seals – Mora Fish Technology Center Chris Nelson – Nelson & Sons, Inc. Richard Kolecki – Colorado Division of Wildlife Rick Barrows – USDA/ARS Hagerman Gary Fornshell - UI Participants
Project Objectives • Measure trout survival, growth, and quality as a function of: • Feed texture and formulation - Year 1 • Diet and water temperature - Year 2 • Rearing density - Year 3 • Conduct production-scale evaluations of the best diet temperature density combinations - Year 3/4 • Product quality • Economic viability • Develop outreach products to disseminate information on diets and culture conditions for inland trout species
Species of Interest Colorado River cutthroat trout Gila trout Snake River cutthroat trout Yellowstone cutthroat trout Chris Myrick
WRAC Pre-Proposals For Trout • 3 vaccine related pre-proposals ( 1 CWD, 2 oral delivery) • 2 proposed aeration studies • 1 economic impact of aquaculture-based recreational fishing
Craig Bond (PI) CSU Steve Davies (Co-PI) CSU John Loomis (Co-PI) CSU Doug Larson (Co-PI) UC-Davis Andrew Seidl (Outreach) CSU Cline Trout Farms (Industry Advisor) Collaborators Fred Conte UC-Davis Jon Boren NMSU Amalia Davies CSU Gary Fornshell UI Kevin Fitzsimmons UA Economic Impacts of Private Sector Aquaculture-Based Recreational Fishing in the Western USA
Economic Impacts of Private Sector Aquaculture-Based Recreational Fishing in the Western USA • In 2001 approximately 5.6 million people recreationally fished freshwater fish in the western U.S. • 71.8 million trips, 88.8 million days (16 days per angler) • $716 per angler per year • Direct economic expenditures of over $4 billion for the region
Objectives • Collect primary data from three distinct subpopulations (ASRF producers, their direct customers, and recreational anglers) and prepare an economic report quantifying the magnitude and value of the economic contributions of the ASRF industry • Provide an appropriate sampling frame for tracking and documenting trends over time in the ASRF industry for use in subsequent economic analyses • Generate primary research about the impacts of the regulatory and competitive environment on the aquaculture industry, including the relationships between private and public hatcheries, interstate trade regulations, and Native American reservation policies
U.S. Trout Industry 2005 • Total value $74.2 M • Trout >12 inches: 59.7 M lbs. production • Trout >12 inches: by value 67% to processors; 19% fee & recreational fishing • 346 operations selling trout
U.S. Trout Industry 2005 • 6-12 inch trout sold 4.79 M fish (↓13%) • 51% sales to fee & rec., 20% to govt. • 1-6 inch trout sold 7.06 M fish (↑27%) • avg. value per 1,000 fish $187 • Trout eggs totaled 307 M (↑6%) • avg. value per 1,000 eggs $16.70 • Losses: 51% disease; 19% drought; 21% other
Seafood • Seafood At Its Best • NOAA pre-proposal • Seafood Watch U.S. Farmed Rainbow Trout • U.S. Organic Aquaculture Standards USTFA Cookbook
Seafood At Its Best Curriculum • Lesson 1: What is seafood? • Lesson 2: Health benefits of seafood • Lesson 3: Seafood borne illnesses and risks of seafood consumption • Lesson 4: Seafood tips – purchasing, handling, storing and cooking seafood
Curriculum Objectives • Increase knowledge of seafood • Informed consumer • Increase seafood consumption Sunburst Trout Co
Target Audience • Family and Consumer Sciences Educators • Nutritionists • Dieticians • Food Service Workers • Other Nutritional Outreach Professionals
Attitudes and Beliefs About Eating Fish • 66% heard something about health benefits • 43% recall negative news • Most do not understand FDA/EPA mercury advisory • 43% eating seafood less often and 35% reduced portion size University of Maryland – Center for Food, Nutrition and Agriculture Policy
NOAA Marine Aquaculture Program • Improve Public Literacy on the Health Benefits and Risks of Consuming Aquatic Foods with an Integrated Science and Education Approach • To develop educational materials that target the general public and media and provide a clear, concise, easy-to-understand message on the benefits and risks involved in consuming farm-raised and wild-harvested seafood. • To provide Cooperative Extension and Sea Grant specialists and educators with science-based information and materials on the benefits and risks of eating farm-raised and wild-caught seafood. • To increase knowledge of the general public and media on benefits and risks involved in eating farm-raised and wild-caught seafood.
Seafood Watch • Monterey Bay Aquarium • http://www.mbayaq.org/cr/seafoodwatch.asp • In 2003 Seafood Watch listed farmed rainbow trout as Best Choice • Currently updating report • Moderate concern about use of marine resources and risk of disease/parasites to wild fish
U.S. Organic Aquaculture Standardshttp://www.ams.usda.gov/nop/TodaysNews.html • Only major food category not eligible under the current USDA regulations for organic agriculture • Email comments to: NOSB.Livestock@usda.govor fax:(202) 205-7808 • Comments due April 10 Ron Hardy
USTFA • http://www.ustfa.org/ • September 20-23 2006 Harrisburg PA • Penn Aqua Conference PA Dept. of Ag, PA Fish and Boat Commission Ron Hardy
Questions? Ron Hardy