1 / 9

PURPOSE

Comparing laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy in different eyes of the same patient. Joseph Frucht-Pery, MD, Faik Orucov, MD *, David Landau, MD, Eyal Strassman, MD, Abraham Solomon, MD.

glenna
Download Presentation

PURPOSE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Comparing laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy in different eyes of the same patient. Joseph Frucht-Pery, MD, Faik Orucov, MD*, David Landau, MD, Eyal Strassman, MD, Abraham Solomon, MD Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah University Hospital; School of Medicine – Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

  2. LASIK PURPOSE VS To compare visual outcome of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in fellow eyes.

  3. LASIK METHODS VS • 50 myopic patients who underwent LASIK in one eye and PRK in the fellow eye. • DECISION FOR PRK: when we couldn't do LASIK: • - I-S ratio greater than 1.4 • - Residual stromal bed ≤ 250μ • - CCT ≤ 470μ • Minimum F/U 6 months.

  4. LASIK RESULTS VS PREOP LASIK P PRK I-S 0.73 D 1.04 D 0.002 SEQ -4.13± 2.06 D -4.75±2.80 D 0.209 BCVA 0.99 0.97 0.140

  5. LASIK RESULTS VS POSTOP LASIK P PRK UCVA 0.98± 0.21 0.96± 0.27 0.466 SEQ -0.17 ± 0.32D -0.07± 0.50 D 0.225 BCVA 1.04± 0.12 1.03± 0.18 0.861 Safety Index 1.05± 0.11 1.07± 0.16 0.367 Efficacy Index 0.98± 0.20 0.98± 0.24 0.991

  6. LASIK RESULTS VS POSTOPERATIVE UCVA Postoperative UCVA • ≥20/40; 100% in LASIK, 92% in PRK • ≥20/20;74% in LASIK, 66% in PRK

  7. LASIK RESULTS VS The BCVA • Improved 14 (28.0%) and in 19 (38.0%) patients in LASIK and PRK • Unchanged 31(62.0%) and in 26 (52.0%) patients in LASIK and PRK • Decreased 5 (10.0%) and in 5(10.0%) patients in LASIK and in PRK 31 62.0% LASIK PRK 26 52.0% 19 38.0% 14 28.0% 5 10.0% 5 10.0%

  8. Change in BCVA pre-post operatively Postoperative SEQ LASIK RESULTS VS preoperative postoperative LASIK 44 88% 44 88% PRK 1.04 1.03 0.99 0.97 5 10% 5 10% 1 2% 1 2% LASIK PRK

  9. LASIK CONCLUSION VS There is no difference in the outcome of LASIK and PRK in the fellow eye.

More Related