1 / 1

Nitrate leaching following cultivation of contrasting temporary grasslands

437. Nitrate leaching following cultivation of contrasting temporary grasslands Jørgen Eriksen & Karen Søegaard Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 50, 8830 Tjele, Denmark. 3. N balance of grasslands. 1. Introduction

gloria
Download Presentation

Nitrate leaching following cultivation of contrasting temporary grasslands

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 437 Nitrate leaching following cultivation of contrasting temporary grasslands Jørgen Eriksen & Karen Søegaard Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 50, 8830 Tjele, Denmark 3. N balance of grasslands 1. Introduction In grazed grassland considerable build-up of N takes place. The extent depends on fertilization, feeding, stocking density, time of grazing and botanical composition of the sward. Consequently, the ploughing of grassland is followed by a large increase in the mineralisation of N. We studied residual effects of temporary grassland on plant production and nitrate leaching. Grassland managements in 1994-96 were either cut leys or grazing with cows, in both pure grass and grass-clover. Cows were fed two levels of N in supplements. Following ploughing of the six sward types was in 1997 spring barley and in 1998 spring wheat. Leaching losses after ploughing were estimated from the concen-tration of nitrate in ceramic suction cups installed at a depth of 1 m. • The N surplus increased in the order: cut - grazed low N - grazed high N. The surplus was higher in grazed pure grass than in grazed grass-clover. 2. Precrop effects Cereal yields following the six grassland systems were compared to yields after cereals: 1st year (spring barley) 4. Nitrate leaching 2nd year (spring wheat) • Overall, leaching losses from pure grass and grass-clover were similar. • The differences in the N balance were only expressed in pure grass. • Fertilizer application resulted in considerably increased nitrate leaching. • Fertilizer-N to cereals following grassland influenced nitrate leaching more than the history of the grassland. • Leaching losses and N-uptake did not match the N surplus. • Precrop effects of grassland were generally huge and the need for supplementary fertilizer low • 1st year precrop effect was about 25 kg N for cut pure grass, 100 kg N for grazed pure grass and >115 kg N ha-1 for grass-clover swards. • 2nd year precrop effect was <0 kg N for cut pure grass, 40 kg N for grazed pure grass and about 60 kg N ha-1 for grass-clover swards.

More Related