210 likes | 223 Views
Explore the ongoing debate on global warming and its impact on businesses. Discover the controversial points, expert opinions, and potential consequences for civilization. Understand the responsibility of businesses in addressing climate change.
E N D
Global Warming Debate and Business Challenges
The world has clearly warmed over the last 100 years • A lot of the warming took place between 1970 and 1998 • If warming continues at the average rate from 1910 to 2000, effects on civilization will be severe • There are strong reasons to believe that at least some of the warming after 1970 has been created by business activity
Beyond these basic points, everything is controversial • 95%+ of professional climate scientists don’t agree with my statement that things are controversial, but …
Businesspeople have to find their role in a confusing situation • Most climate scientists believe what we are doing to the planet (increasing emissions of carbon dioxide, methane) is certain to cause catastrophe • But a few do not • Richard Lenzen, Alfred Sloan Professor of Climate Science at M.I.T. • John Christy, NOAA-funded researcher at U. of Alabama • Experts in seemingly related fields are skeptical • Forecasting, decision science • The stakes are high
Business has to deal with… • contradictory claims; • threat that we may seriously damage civilization. • A big question: Just what is our responsibility?
Earth’s climate varies from year to year and century to century • Much of human history took place during ice ages • Emergence of agriculture and spurt in population took place just after a moderate warming • After that climate was unusually stable • Warming was noted in the 1930s, continued to the 40s, but was reversed 1945-1971 • Maybe because this was the era of high particulate-emitting cars and factories in America and Europe?
Warming resumed after 1971 • Today the earth is at least 1〫or so warmer than in 1910
Lots of things can heat the earth • Most are poorly understood • But clearly, some gases let more heat come in than they allow to go out • Business activity is increasing the amount of these gases
But it’s complex to determine how much heat stays • And some things humans do make things cooler • Soot in the atmosphere • Mainstream climate scientists’ models suggest current trends lead to 3〫more warming by 2010 • and much more heating after that • Carbon burned today stays in atmosphere a long time • Many climate scientists thing things will be worse • They’re asked to be ‘cautious’ in their projections • Today’s models don’t include recent developing world acceleration
Serious consequences are predicted • Heat waves • Stronger hurricanes • Change in locations where rain falls • Higher sea levels • Less food production in tropical countries • But more food production further from the equator • Not necessarily the end of civilization, but not a world we’d like to see
Are there good reasons why some are skeptical? • John Christy, a co-author of the original IPCC reports, says: • Standard estimates overstate warming because of urbanization around the temperature measuring sites • Parking lots, new air conditioners, buildings radiating heat have been created near some measuring equipment • Christy & Spenser measure temperature using NASA satellite data, get much lower numbers • “The real atmosphere has many ways to respond to the changes that increased CO2 forces on it” • Some data suggests as earth warms, cloud cover increases, limiting warming
Not all “scientific consensuses” are correct • In recent decades, researchers in forecasting and decision sciences have tried to identify when ‘expert opinion’ is reliable • Their rules say: Create a simple causal model • They say if the model is complex and contains lots of uncertainty, it isn’t reliable • So they’re skeptical about standard climate scientists • Armstrong (forecasting expert) says: do nothing • Christy says: Build nuclear power
Have businesspeople had to deal with debates like this in the past? • Yes, often. Some non-successes • Psychological testing programs • Econometric forecasting • Psychoanalysis • But probably never with such high stakes
So how should we think about the threat of global warming? • At minimum, the global warming story is a careful but potentially fallible weather forecast • It may be wrong • But so might the forecasts today on weather.com • The fact that forecasts might be wrong doesn’t prevent us from refusing to go on picnics when forecasts say it will rain
Challenge – and opportunity • Standard science argues it’s important to keep global temperatures from rising more than 2〫 • Standard estimates suggest big declines in greenhouse gas emissions are needed to keep rise to that level • Because carbon entering atmosphere today stays for 200 years or so, gas produced post-WW II is just beginning to affect the earth • Demanded cut are unlike anything close to passing Congress • A WW II-level mobilization?
Meaning for business • Energy is by many measures the world’s largest industry • If it’s changing rapidly, there will be lots of opportunity • (If China’s currency is undervalued, the opportunity may go to China)
To the extent that the standard theory is followed, lots will change • Government will remake the energy world • Silicon Valley business can prosper • It won’t be surprising if others resent us • While many businesspeople may prosper, there will be need for many to sacrifice