1 / 11

Carrot Lab – Editing Session

Carrot Lab – Editing Session. Switch with your lab buddy. Overall. Does it look neat? Does it look professional? Font Size: Size 10-12, ½ - 1 inch margins Font : Worth : 3 Points Times New Roman Calibri Arial Georgia C ambria. Some things to keep in Mind.

glynis
Download Presentation

Carrot Lab – Editing Session

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Carrot Lab – Editing Session Switch with your lab buddy

  2. Overall • Does it look neat? • Does it look professional? • Font Size: • Size 10-12, ½ - 1 inch margins • Font: Worth: 3 Points • Times New Roman • Calibri • Arial • Georgia • Cambria

  3. Some things to keep in Mind • No use of I, WE, THEY, IT

  4. Title • Is it original? (Not Carrot Lab) • Is it in the top left of the page? • Typos? • Is it the same size as the rest of the font? • Worth: 1 point

  5. Background • Does the section have a bolded and underlined title? • Does it give enough backgound information? • Does it explain a little about carrots/ plant cells/ cells reaction to salt? • Does it flow from general to specific? • Is the last sentence a purpose statement? • “The purpose of this is lab is to ……” • Typos? • Worth: 3 point

  6. Hypothesis • Does the section have a bolded and underlined title? • Is it an “If _____ then______” statement? • If a carrot is soaked in salt water, then it will increase in size. Or whatever their hypothesis should be. • Typos?

  7. Materials • Does the section have a bolded and underlined title? • Is it complete? Glance through the procedures and see if they missed anything • Are the materials listed in bullets and columns? • Typos? • Worth: 2 point

  8. Procedure • Does the section have a bolded and underlined title? • Does it contain enough instruction to replicate? • Are the steps numbered? • Typos? • Worth: 6 point

  9. Data/ Results • Does the section have a bolded and underlined title? • Does it have a chart containing quantitative data • Charts should be neatly organized, made on the computer • ALL CHARTS NEED CAPTIONS • “Figure 1: Carrots length before and after soaking” • Does it have a paragraph containing qualitative data. • Comparing before and after of both carrots (So, 4 descriptions) • Typos? • Worth: 6 point

  10. Analysis • Does the section have a bolded and underlined title? • Does it attempt to explain the results? • Are there at least 2 sources of error listed? • Typos?

  11. Conclusion • Does it start with a Restatement of the hypothesis? • “In this lab, the carrots ability to stand up to salt was tested” • Does it review the procedures (how the hypothesis was tested) in 2-3 sentences? • Does it determine if the hypothesis was supported or not? • “The hypothesis was supported by the evidence collected” • Typos? • Worth: 4 point

More Related